| Literature DB >> 31191836 |
Bibi Fatemeh Nobakht Motlagh Ghoochani1,2, Mohsen Ghafourpour3, Fateme Abdollahi2, Shima Tavallaie4.
Abstract
AIM: We aimed to determine these parameters in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease using pro-oxidant antioxidant balance assay.Entities:
Keywords: NAFLD; Oxidative stress; Pro-oxidants/ antioxidants balance
Year: 2019 PMID: 31191836 PMCID: PMC6536017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench ISSN: 2008-2258
Anthropometric and clinical characteristics of participants
| Control (n=35) | NAFLD (n=38) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (M/F) | 13/22 | 17/21 | 0.635 |
| Height (cm) | 164.6±1.52 | 163.77±1.96 | 0.740 |
| Weight (kg) | 66.23±1.76 | 79.00±2.03 | 0.000 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.43±0.57 | 29.63±0.81 | 0.000 |
| FBS (mg/dl) | 90.05±1.15 | 92.29±1.99 | 0.336 |
| TC (mg/dl) | 174.47±5.64 | 195.37±7.22 | 0.026 |
| TG (mg/dl) | 106.67±8.74 | 147.1±11.91 | 0.008 |
| LDL-C (mg/dl) | 103.20±4.28 | 105.19±4.79 | 0.758 |
| HDL-C (mg/dl) | 47.00±1.21 | 45.40±1.68 | 0.446 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 21.67 (8-48) | 41.00 (13-157) | 0.000 |
| AST (IU/L) | 18.11±1.01 | 28.43±2.70 | 0.001 |
| ALP (U/L) | 163.58±7.54 | 193.13±9.17 | 0.015 |
| T Bili (mg/dl) | 0.80±0.04 | 0.83±0.06 | 0.663 |
| D Bili (mg/dl) | 0.21 (0.1-0.4) | 0.24 (0.07-0.41) | 0.264 |
| PAB (HK) | 97.47±5.7 | 98.90±6.71 | 0.871 |
Values are presented as mean±SE (parametric analysis) and mean (range) (non-parametric analysis). FBS: Fasting blood sugar; TC: Total cholesterol; TG: Triglyceride; LDL: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate aminotransferase; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; T Bili: Total bilirubin; D Bili: Direct bilirubin. Comparison between two groups (control vs. NAFLD patients) using Fisher's exact test (for categorical variables such as gender), the independent t-test (for normal distributed data: all variables except for gender, ALT and D Bili), and Mann-Whitney U test (for non-normal distributed data: ALT and D Bili).
Figure 1Change in pro-oxidant–antioxidant balance (PAB) based on gender between the study groups. PAB data were expressed as mean. There was a significant increase in PAB values in females between the study groups. *p < 0.05, female versus male in the control group; *p < 0.001, female versus male in NAFLD and total participants