Literature DB >> 31188432

Optimizing clinical trials recruitment via deep learning.

Jelena Gligorijevic1, Djordje Gligorijevic1, Martin Pavlovski1,2, Elizabeth Milkovits3, Lucas Glass3, Kevin Grier3, Praveen Vankireddy3, Zoran Obradovic1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Clinical trials, prospective research studies on human participants carried out by a distributed team of clinical investigators, play a crucial role in the development of new treatments in health care. This is a complex and expensive process where investigators aim to enroll volunteers with predetermined characteristics, administer treatment(s), and collect safety and efficacy data. Therefore, choosing top-enrolling investigators is essential for efficient clinical trial execution and is 1 of the primary drivers of drug development cost.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: To facilitate clinical trials optimization, we propose DeepMatch (DM), a novel approach that builds on top of advances in deep learning. DM is designed to learn from both investigator and trial-related heterogeneous data sources and rank investigators based on their expected enrollment performance on new clinical trials.
RESULTS: Large-scale evaluation conducted on 2618 studies provides evidence that the proposed ranking-based framework improves the current state-of-the-art by up to 19% on ranking investigators and up to 10% on detecting top/bottom performers when recruiting investigators for new clinical trials. DISCUSSION: The extensive experimental section suggests that DM can provide substantial improvement over current industry standards in several regards: (1) the enrollment potential of the investigator list, (2) the time it takes to generate the list, and (3) data-informed decisions about new investigators.
CONCLUSION: Due to the great significance of the problem at hand, related research efforts are set to shift the paradigm of how investigators are chosen for clinical trials, thereby optimizing and automating them and reducing the cost of new therapies.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trials; deep learning; deep matching; electronic health records; pointwise ranking

Year:  2019        PMID: 31188432      PMCID: PMC7647233          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  9 in total

1.  Overcoming barriers to NLP for clinical text: the role of shared tasks and the need for additional creative solutions.

Authors:  Wendy W Chapman; Prakash M Nadkarni; Lynette Hirschman; Leonard W D'Avolio; Guergana K Savova; Ozlem Uzuner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  How much do clinical trials cost?

Authors:  Linda Martin; Melissa Hutchens; Conrad Hawkins; Alaina Radnov
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  2016 FDA drug approvals.

Authors:  Asher Mullard
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Symbolic rule-based classification of lung cancer stages from free-text pathology reports.

Authors:  Anthony N Nguyen; Michael J Lawley; David P Hansen; Rayleen V Bowman; Belinda E Clarke; Edwina E Duhig; Shoni Colquist
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Doctor AI: Predicting Clinical Events via Recurrent Neural Networks.

Authors:  Edward Choi; Mohammad Taha Bahadori; Andy Schuetz; Walter F Stewart; Jimeng Sun
Journal:  JMLR Workshop Conf Proc       Date:  2016-12-10

6.  Automatically extracting cancer disease characteristics from pathology reports into a Disease Knowledge Representation Model.

Authors:  Anni Coden; Guergana Savova; Igor Sominsky; Michael Tanenblatt; James Masanz; Karin Schuler; James Cooper; Wei Guan; Piet C de Groen
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Modeling Healthcare Quality via Compact Representations of Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Jelena Stojanovic; Djordje Gligorijevic; Vladan Radosavljevic; Nemanja Djuric; Mihajlo Grbovic; Zoran Obradovic
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Bidirectional RNN for Medical Event Detection in Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Abhyuday N Jagannatha; Hong Yu
Journal:  Proc Conf       Date:  2016-06

9.  Improving site selection in clinical studies: a standardised, objective, multistep method and first experience results.

Authors:  Anahí Hurtado-Chong; Alexander Joeris; Denise Hess; Michael Blauth
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of patient-level retrieval from electronic health record data for a cohort discovery task.

Authors:  Steven R Chamberlin; Steven D Bedrick; Aaron M Cohen; Yanshan Wang; Andrew Wen; Sijia Liu; Hongfang Liu; William R Hersh
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-07-26

2.  ELaPro, a LOINC-mapped core dataset for top laboratory procedures of eligibility screening for clinical trials.

Authors:  Ahmed Rafee; Sarah Riepenhausen; Philipp Neuhaus; Alexandra Meidt; Martin Dugas; Julian Varghese
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 4.612

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence for assisting cancer diagnosis and treatment in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Zi-Hang Chen; Li Lin; Chen-Fei Wu; Chao-Feng Li; Rui-Hua Xu; Ying Sun
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2021-10-06

Review 4.  Crowdsourcing and open innovation in drug discovery: recent contributions and future directions.

Authors:  David C Thompson; Jörg Bentzien
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 7.851

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.