Literature DB >> 31187179

A longitudinal qualitative evaluation of patient perspectives of adverse events after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Gena C Dunivan1, Brenna L McGuire2, Heidi A Rishel Brakey3, Yuko M Komesu4, Rebecca G Rogers5, Andrew L Sussman6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Patient perception of adverse events (AEs) after pelvic floor disorder surgery is incompletely understood and may differ from providers' views of AEs. Our objective is to describe patient perceptions of AEs related to pelvic floor disorder surgery and how perceptions change over time.
METHODS: Mixed-method study of longitudinal patient interviews and surveys. Women planning pelvic floor disorder surgery completed three one-on-one interviews: preoperatively (< 12 weeks before surgery), 6-8 weeks postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively. Interviews explored the patient experience of surgery and their perception of AEs over time. Participants ranked self-identified AEs by severity. De-identified transcripts of audio recordings were coded and analyzed using an iterative, thematic, team-based process using NVivo software (QSR International).
RESULTS: Twenty women each completed three separate interviews for a total of 60 interviews. Their mean age was 55.3 (± 12.7) years, and 50% were Non-Hispanic white. Women's perceptions of AEs changed as more time passed from surgery. Women identified potential problems related to surgery such as anesthesia complications, pain, injury, catheter issues, and an unsuccessful surgery as the most concerning AEs preoperatively. Postoperatively (6-8 weeks), women expressed concern about functional outcomes (e.g., performing daily activities, symptom reduction). Late postoperatively (6 months), the majority identified unsuccessful surgery, incontinence, and sexual dysfunction as severe AEs. These findings are consistent with prior work that suggests women perceive functional outcomes as fundamental to their recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of patient-centered perspectives on AEs. Patients view poor functional outcomes as severe AEs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional outcomes; Pelvic floor disorders; Qualitative mixed method study; Surgical adverse events

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31187179     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-03998-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  16 in total

1.  The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience.

Authors:  Pierre A Clavien; Jeffrey Barkun; Michelle L de Oliveira; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Daniel Dindo; Richard D Schulick; Eduardo de Santibañes; Juan Pekolj; Ksenija Slankamenac; Claudio Bassi; Rolf Graf; René Vonlanthen; Robert Padbury; John L Cameron; Masatoshi Makuuchi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The effects of giving patients verbal or written pre-operative information in gynecologic oncology surgery: a randomized study and the medical-legal point of view.

Authors:  Roberto Angioli; Francesco Plotti; Stella Capriglione; Alessia Aloisi; Maria Elisa Aloisi; Daniela Luvero; Andrea Miranda; Roberto Montera; Matteo Gulino; Paola Frati
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  M D Barber; M N Kuchibhatla; C F Pieper; R C Bump
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test.

Authors:  M F Scheier; C S Carver; M W Bridges
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1994-12

5.  A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair.

Authors:  John T Wei; Ingrid Nygaard; Holly E Richter; Charles W Nager; Matthew D Barber; Kim Kenton; Cindy L Amundsen; Joseph Schaffer; Susan F Meikle; Cathie Spino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse.

Authors:  Sushma Srikrishna; Dudley Robinson; Linda Cardozo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome.

Authors:  Eman A Elkadry; Kimberly S Kenton; Mary P FitzGerald; Susan Shott; Linda Brubaker
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Experiences and expectations of women with urogenital prolapse: a quantitative and qualitative exploration.

Authors:  S Srikrishna; D Robinson; L Cardozo; R Cartwright
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Between hope and fear: patient's expectations prior to pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Sameh S S Lawndy; Mariella I Withagen; Kirsten B Kluivers; Mark E Vierhout
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  AUGS-PERFORM: A New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Quality of Prolapse Care.

Authors:  Michele O'Shea; Sarah Boyles; Catherine S Bradley; Kristin Jacobs; Molly McFatrich; Vivian Sung; Kevin Weinfurt; Nazema Y Siddiqui
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 1.913

Review 2.  Patient-Centered Goals for Treatment of Pelvic Floor Disorders.

Authors:  Angela Dao; Gena Dunivan
Journal:  Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep       Date:  2022-10-14
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.