Literature DB >> 24793931

The effects of giving patients verbal or written pre-operative information in gynecologic oncology surgery: a randomized study and the medical-legal point of view.

Roberto Angioli1, Francesco Plotti2, Stella Capriglione3, Alessia Aloisi3, Maria Elisa Aloisi4, Daniela Luvero3, Andrea Miranda5, Roberto Montera3, Matteo Gulino2, Paola Frati6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the verbal and written preoperative information in patients undergoing surgery for malignant gynaecologic disease, in terms of satisfaction about preoperative received informations, hospitalization days, postoperative pain experienced using visual analogue scale (VAS) and number of pain drugs used daily. STUDY
DESIGN: From January 2008 to December 2012, consecutive patients with diagnosis of endometrial cancer, referred to the Division of Gynecology of University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, were enrolled. Eligible subjects were randomized into two groups: Group V (Verbal information ward) consisted of patients who had verbal preoperative information about surgical procedure and postoperative management and Group W (Written Information ward) consisted of patients who had written preoperative information. All preoperative and postoperative data were recorded. Concerning satisfaction about preoperative received informations, patients were asked to complete the QLQ-C30 and the EORTC INFO25.
RESULTS: 190 patients were considered in this study. Group W (n=92) has a better info satisfaction (p=0.0008, statistically significant), a mean VAS value lower (p=0.02, statistically significant) and also a lower number of hospitalization days (p=0.0265, statistically significant) and pain medications used daily, (p=0.0120, statistically significant), comparing with group V (n=98).
CONCLUSIONS: We support the use of preoperative information leaflet to better prepare patients for a surgical procedure, showing a faster recovery, low medications use and a better quality of life outcome.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Information; Medical-legal; Outpatients; Preoperative; Questionnaire

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24793931     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  9 in total

1.  Improving cancer patients' knowledge about totally implantable access port: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michela Piredda; Valentina Biagioli; Diana Giannarelli; Daniele Incletoli; Francesca Grieco; Massimiliano Carassiti; Maria Grazia De Marinis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.603

2. 

Authors:  Berrin Günaydın; Ömer Kurtipek
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2018-06-01

Review 3.  Effects of preoperative opioid education on postoperative opioid use and pain management in orthopaedics: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kylee Rucinski; James L Cook
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-21

4.  Prospective randomised controlled trial of written supplement to verbal communication of results to patients at the time of flexible cystoscopy.

Authors:  Frank D'Arcy; Chew Lin Yip; Kiran Manya; Paul McGivern; Rustom P Manecksha; Damien Bolton; Shomik Sengupta
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  The Effect of Pre-operative Psychological Interventions on Psychological, Physiological, and Immunological Indices in Oncology Patients: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Tsipi Hanalis-Miller; Gabriel Nudelman; Shamgar Ben-Eliyahu; Rebecca Jacoby
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-14

6.  How Much Information Do Icelandic Men Receive on Pros and Cons of Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Prior to Undergoing Testing?

Authors:  Valgerdur Kristin Eiriksdottir; Birna Baldursdottir; Jon Orn Fridriksson; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2022 May-Jun

7.  Developing a patient information leaflet to improve information offered to patients undergoing appendicectomy.

Authors:  Radford Smith; Katie Cross
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2016-04-07

8.  A longitudinal qualitative evaluation of patient perspectives of adverse events after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Gena C Dunivan; Brenna L McGuire; Heidi A Rishel Brakey; Yuko M Komesu; Rebecca G Rogers; Andrew L Sussman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Psychological preparation and postoperative outcomes for adults undergoing surgery under general anaesthesia.

Authors:  Rachael Powell; Neil W Scott; Anne Manyande; Julie Bruce; Claus Vögele; Lucie M T Byrne-Davis; Mary Unsworth; Christian Osmer; Marie Johnston
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.