| Literature DB >> 31186724 |
Abstract
The expression of micro ribonucleic acid (miR)-124 and miR-126 in different stages of breast cancer (BC) and their correlation were investigated to analyze the role of miR-124 and miR-126 in the occurrence and development of BC. BC tissues of 83 BC patients treated in First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine from March 2016 to January 2018 were selected as the research group, while the corresponding para-carcinoma normal tissues were selected as the control group. The relative expression levels of miR-124 and miR-126 in both groups were detected via reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), and the miR-124 and miR-126 expression asociated with clinicopathological parameters of patients and the correlation between miR-124 and miR-126 was analyzed. The relative expression levels of miR-124 and miR-126 in the research group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P<0.001). miR-124 and miR-126 in the research group were associated with clinicopathological parameters (clinical stage, degree of pathological differentiation and lymph node metastasis) of patients (P<0.001). According to Pearsons correlation analysis, there was a positive correlation between the relative expression levels of miR-124 and miR-126 in cancer tissues (r=0.497, P<0.001). The expression levels of miR-124 and miR-126 were downregulated in BC tissues, which were associated with clinicopathological parameters (clinical stage, degree of pathological differentiation and lymph node metastasis). There was a positive correlation between the expression levels of miR-124 and miR-126 in BC tissues. Thus, miR-124 and miR-126 may be involved in the occurrence, development, invasion and metastasis of BC, and both can be used as targeted biological indexes for treatment of BC.Entities:
Keywords: breast cancer; clinical stage; degree of differentiation; lymph node metastasis; miR-124; miR-126
Year: 2019 PMID: 31186724 PMCID: PMC6507385 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10184
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Primers of miR-124, miR-126 and internal reference U6.
| Groups | Forward primers | Reverse primers |
|---|---|---|
| miR-124 | 5′-GCTAAGGCACGCGGTG-3′ | 5′-GTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT-3′ |
| miR-126 | 5′-CATTATTACAGGGCAGCGGTCGC-3′ | 5′-CATTATTACGCGGCAGGTGCCGT-3′ |
| U6 | 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACATATACT-3′ | 5′-ACGCTTCACGAATTT-GCGTGTC-3′ |
Figure 1.Expression of miR-124 and miR-126 in the research and control groups. (A) Results of RT-qPCR reveal that the expression level of miR-124 in the research group is significantly lower than that in the control group (t=45.850, *P<0.001), showing a statistically significant difference. (B) Results of RT-qPCR reveal that the expression level of miR-126 in the research group is significantly lower than that in the control group (t=25.140, *P<0.001), displaying a statistically significant difference. miR, micro ribonucleic acid; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Expression of miR-124 in different clinicopathological features of BC patients in the research group (mean ± standard deviation).
| Factor | n=83 | miR-124 | t | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 0.188 | 0.850 | ||
| ≤50 | 40 | 1.37±0.55 | ||
| >50 | 43 | 1.35±0.41 | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.430 | 0.669 | ||
| ≤2 | 31 | 1.38±0.54 | ||
| >2 | 52 | 1.34±0.31 | ||
| TNM stage | 13.600 | <0.001 | ||
| I–II | 50 | 2.02±0.53 | ||
| III–IV | 33 | 0.70±0.21 | ||
| Degree of pathological differentiation | 38.360 | <0.001 | ||
| Moderate-low | 27 | 0.36±0.01 | ||
| High | 56 | 2.36±0.27 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 32.610 | <0.001 | ||
| No | 35 | 2.32±0.16 | ||
| Yes | 48 | 0.40±0.32 |
Expression of miR-126 in different clinicopathological features of BC patients in the research group (mean ± standard deviation).
| Factors | n=83 | miR-126 | t | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 0.988 | 0.326 | ||
| ≤50 | 40 | 0.26±0.11 | ||
| >50 | 43 | 0.23±0.16 | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.802 | 0.425 | ||
| ≤2 | 31 | 0.25±0.09 | ||
| >2 | 52 | 0.23±0.12 | ||
| TNM stage | 7.570 | <0.001 | ||
| I–II | 50 | 0.33±0.12 | ||
| III–IV | 33 | 0.15±0.08 | ||
| Degree of pathological differentiation | 5.222 | <0.001 | ||
| Moderate-low | 27 | 0.18±0.14 | ||
| High | 56 | 0.30±0.07 | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 3.802 | <0.001 | ||
| No | 35 | 0.29±0.10 | ||
| Yes | 48 | 0.19±0.13 |
Figure 2.Correlation between miR-124 and miR-126 in cancer tissues in the research group. According to the results of the Pearsons correlation analysis, there is a positive correlation between the relative expression levels of miR-124 and miR-126 in cancer tissues in the research group (r=0.497, P<0.001). miR, micro ribonucleic acid.