Literature DB >> 31186532

Genomic and phenotypic consequences of two independent secondary contact zones between allopatric lineages of the anadromous ice goby Leucopsarion petersii.

Shotaro Hirase1, Tomoyuki Kokita2, Atsushi J Nagano3, Kiyoshi Kikuchi4.   

Abstract

Genetic and phenotypic analyses of independent secondary contact zones between certain pairs of divergent populations offer powerful opportunities to assess whether the consequences vary with different environmental backgrounds. Populations of the ice goby Leucopsarion petersii are distributed throughout the Japanese archipelago and comprise genetically and phenotypically divergent groups in the Japan Sea and the Pacific Ocean. In particular, populations in the Japan Sea have a larger body size and numbers of vertebrae than those in the Pacific Ocean. Herein, we performed integrated analyses of genotypes and phenotypes of two independent secondary contact zones and investigated their consequences. Population genetic analyses revealed asymmetric introgression of the mitochondrial genome of either lineage relative to little admixture of nuclear genomes in both secondary contact zones. On phenotype analyses, vertebral numbers were clearly explained by nuclear genomic ancestry in both secondary contact zones, whereas body size was not, suggesting that a little introgression of nuclear genes regulates body size. Actually, we observed biased introgression of a candidate gene, neuropeptide Y (NPY), which potentially controls body size in the ice goby. Moreover, the body size changes in the introgressed populations possibly affect the introgression patterns of mitochondrial genomes across these zones. Collectively, our results demonstrated that genomic and phenotypic consequences of secondary contact varied in marine variable environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31186532      PMCID: PMC6906451          DOI: 10.1038/s41437-019-0239-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  44 in total

1.  Leaky prezygotic isolation and porous genomes: rapid introgression of maternally inherited DNA.

Authors:  Kai M A Chan; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Chapuis; Arnaud Estoup
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Informed and automated k-mer size selection for genome assembly.

Authors:  Rayan Chikhi; Paul Medvedev
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency.

Authors:  J F Brookfield
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Introgressive hybridization between two Iberian endemic cyprinid fish: a comparison between two independent hybrid zones.

Authors:  M A Aboim; J Mavárez; L Bernatchez; M M Coelho
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Glacial cycles as an allopatric speciation pump in north-eastern American freshwater fishes.

Authors:  Julien April; Robert H Hanner; Anne-Marie Dion-Côté; Louis Bernatchez
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Production of growth factors by malignant lymphoma cell lines.

Authors:  M Tweeddale; N Jamal; A Nguyen; X H Wang; M D Minden; H A Messner
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1989-08-01       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Evolution of Pacific Ocean and the Sea of Japan populations of the gobiid species, Pterogobius elapoides and Pterogobius zonoleucus, based on molecular and morphological analyses.

Authors:  Akishinonomiya Fumihito; Yuji Ikeda; Masahiro Aizawa; Takashi Makino; Yumi Umehara; Yoshiaki Kai; Yuriko Nishimoto; Masami Hasegawa; Tetsuji Nakabo; Takashi Gojobori
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 3.688

9.  Linkage mapping and comparative genomics using next-generation RAD sequencing of a non-model organism.

Authors:  Simon W Baxter; John W Davey; J Spencer Johnston; Anthony M Shelton; David G Heckel; Chris D Jiggins; Mark L Blaxter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Natural selection on body size is mediated by multiple interacting factors: a comparison of beetle populations varying naturally and experimentally in body size.

Authors:  Angela R Amarillo-Suárez; R Craig Stillwell; Charles W Fox
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.