| Literature DB >> 31186414 |
Dieter Henrik Heiland1,2,3, Vidhya M Ravi4,5,6, Simon P Behringer7,4,5, Jan Hendrik Frenking7,4,5, Julian Wurm7,4,5, Kevin Joseph4,5,6, Nicklas W C Garrelfs7,4,5, Jakob Strähle4,5, Sabrina Heynckes7,4,5, Jürgen Grauvogel4,5, Pamela Franco7,4,5, Irina Mader8,9, Matthias Schneider10, Anna-Laura Potthoff10, Daniel Delev11, Ulrich G Hofmann4,5,6, Christian Fung4,5, Jürgen Beck4,5, Roman Sankowski5,12, Marco Prinz5,12,13,14, Oliver Schnell7,4,5.
Abstract
Reactive astrocytes evolve after brain injury, inflammatory and degenerative diseases, whereby they undergo transcriptomic re-programming. In malignant brain tumors, their function and crosstalk to other components of the environment is poorly understood. Here we report a distinct transcriptional phenotype of reactive astrocytes from glioblastoma linked to JAK/STAT pathway activation. Subsequently, we investigate the origin of astrocytic transformation by a microglia loss-of-function model in a human organotypic slice model with injected tumor cells. RNA-seq based gene expression analysis of astrocytes reveals a distinct astrocytic phenotype caused by the coexistence of microglia and astrocytes in the tumor environment, which leads to a large release of anti-inflammatory cytokines such as TGFβ, IL10 and G-CSF. Inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway shifts the balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines towards a pro-inflammatory environment. The complex interaction of astrocytes and microglia cells promotes an immunosuppressive environment, suggesting that tumor-associated astrocytes contribute to anti-inflammatory responses.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31186414 PMCID: PMC6559986 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10493-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Purification and transcriptional profiling of tumor-associates astrocytes. a Illustration of the workflow. Cortex specimens from epilepsy patients (n = 3), entry cortex from glioblastoma patients (n = 2) and glioblastoma specimens (n = 7) were collected, followed by purification of astrocytes using immunopanning. RNA was analyzed by cDNA sequencing. b AutoPipe unsupervised cluster and heatmap of 30 most representative genes of astrocytes derived from healthy cortex and tumor specimens. c Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) highlights an increased response to cytokines, and JAK/STAT signaling in tumor-associated astrocytes. Exact values are given in the source file. d Gene set enrichment plot of ranked gene expression indicate the enrichment of the IFNγ response in tumor associated astrocytes. e Two-dimensional scatterplot of astrocytic differentiation and reactivity reveals a shift in the tumor-associated astrocytes towards the progenitor phenotype and alternative reactivity. Each individual dot represents a transcriptome profile. Round dots mark the expressions analyses generated in this study, other data are marked with stars (Zamanian et al., 2012)[17], as well as crosses (Zhang et al., 2016)[13]. Colors indicate the source of astrocytes as illustrated below. List of selected genes is given in the source file. f–h Immunostaining of tumor-associated astrocytes localized at the glial scar in the infiltrating region. GFAP+-astrocytes were marked by CD276 expression, STAT3 phosphorylation and CHI3L1 expression
Fig. 2CD274+-astrocytes in glioblastoma specimens. a Immunohistochemistry of GFAP and CD274 of the tumor margin, arrows indicate the regions illustrated in the left panel. b Each dot represents the average number (3 fields per sample) of astrocytes per cm2 in entry cortex (n = 9), peritumoral region (n = 9) and the tumor core (n = 10). Exact values, as well as statistical analysis are given in the source file. c Immunohistochemistry of the myeloid landscape of the tumor margin, microglia were marked by IBA1 and P2RY12, T-cells by CD3, tumor-associated macrophages/activated microglia by CD68 and HLA-DR. d Each dot represents the average number of cells per cm2 in all different regions (3 fields per sample). Exact values, as well as statistical analysis are given in the source file. Arrow 1: Tumor Core; Arrow 2: Peritumoral Tissue and Infiltrating Region; Arrow 3: Non-Infiltrating Region. P-values are determined by one-way ANOVA (d) adjusted by Benjamini-Hochberger for multiple testing. Data is given as mean ± standard deviation
Fig. 3Microglia loss-of-function model with transcriptional profiling of astrocytes. a Illustration of the workflow to set-up a human slice model combined with microglia depletion and tumor injection. Entry cortex was taken from the operation theatre, sliced within 10 min into 300 µm slices and cultured in serum-free conditions. In a 3 days time-course, slices are incubated with 1 mg/ml of Chlodronate to deplete microglia or control condition. 20,000 primary serum-free cultured ZsGreen tagged tumor cells were injected. After 4 days of tumor growth, astrocytes and microglia were purified for RNA-seq analysis (Detailed workflow is given in the Supplementary Fig. 6) b Representative staining of IBA-1 confirmed a robust depletion of microglia in human slices without loss of NeuN expression in neurons. c Representative staining of tumor injection in a time dependent manner. d Analysis of differentially expressed genes of purified astrocytes in Microglia(+) or Microglia(−) condition. Genes are ordered based on fold-change of gene expression between the control (Tumor(−)) and tumor injection (Tumor(+)), with blue indicating an > = 12 fold higher expressed in control samples and red an > = 12 fold higher expression in tumor injected samples. Lines indicate the differences of the fold-change rank (top 30 genes) between Microglia(+) and Microglia(−) condition. The R-code and detailed description is given in the source data. e Gene Set Expression Analysis (GSEA) of ranked gene expression of Microglia(+) or Microglia(−) condition indicate the enrichment differences of the JAK/STAT pathway. f Cytokine protein level in all conditions. Exact values, as well as statistical analysis are given in the source file. g Representative immunostaining of tumor infiltration after 4 days of culture and quantification h, i. Exact values of cell numbers are given in the source file. j Gating strategy to purify astrocytes from FACS data. Detailed plots for gating are given in the Supplementary Fig. 8. k FACS data analyzed by T-SNE, colors indicate the experimental conditions. I T-SNE map with STAT3-P (left) and Ki-67 (right) intensity, colors indicate the intensity (red: high intensity, blue: low intensity). P-values are determined by one-way ANOVA (f, h, i) adjusted by Benjamini–Hochberger (f, h, i) or False-Discovery Rate (e) for multiple testing. Data is given as mean ± standard deviation
Fig. 4Transcriptional profiling of astrocytes from the human organotypic slice model. Scatterplot of astrocytic differentiation and reactivity reveals a shift in purified astrocytes from all experimental conditions and co-cultured astrocytes towards the progenitor phenotype and alternative reactivity. Astrocytes purified from slices are illustrated by dots, astrocytic cell lines marked by crosses. List of analyzed genes is given in the source file (Source File Fig. 1e)
Fig. 5Transcriptional profiling of microglia from slices and a co-culture model. a AutoPipe unsupervised cluster and heatmap of 30 most representative genes expressed in microglia derived from control and tumor injected slices. b Illustration of the co-culture model. c Analysis of differentially expressed genes of purified microglia in Astrocytes (+) or Astrocytes (−) condition. Genes are ordered based of fold-change of gene expression, colored in blue for highly expressed in control samples and red for increased expression in tumor injected samples. Lines indicate the differences of the fold-change rank (top 30 genes) between Astrocytes (+) and Astrocytes (−) condition. d Gene Set Expression Analysis (GSEA) of ranked gene expression of Astrocytes (+) or Astrocytes (−) condition indicate the enrichment differences of the genes involved in glycolysis. e–h Bar plots of cytokine protein level in all conditions. Exact values, as well as statistical analysis are given in the source file. P-values are determined by one-way ANOVA e–h adjusted by Benjamini–Hochberger (e–h) or False-Discovery Rate (d) for multiple testing. Data is given as mean ± standard deviation
Fig. 6Cytokine profiling after JAK-inhibition. a Illustration of the workflow b Fluorescence imaging of the tumor growth in Ctr, JAK inhibition and pre-treated JAK-inhibitor slices condition. The time point of tumor injection is colored in green, the 5th day time point in red. On the bottom, immunostainings of the STAT3-P level in all experimental conditions. c Tumor growth in slices in all experimental conditions. d Number of STAT3-P cells per cm2. e Level of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines in tumor injected slices administrated to either control conditions or JAK-Inhibitor (Ruxolitinib). f Level TGFb and IL10 in different treatment regimes. P-values were determined by one-way ANOVA adjusted by Benjamini–Hochberger for multiple testing. Data is given as mean ± standard deviation. Exact values of all cytokines are given in the source file
Reagent sources
| Reagents/resources | Source | Identifier |
| Antibodies | ||
| AffiniPure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG + IgM | Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc., West Grove, PA, USA | 115–005–044 |
| AffiniPure Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) | Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc., West Grove, PA, USA | 111–005–003 |
| Anti-CD11b (Rabbit) | Abcam, Cambridge, UK | ab52478 |
| Anti-CD45 (Rabbit) | Abcam, Cambridge, UK | ab10558 |
| Anti-CD68 (Mouse) | Abcam, Cambridge, UK | ab201340 |
| Anti-HepaCAM (Human) | R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA | MAB4108 |
| Anti-STAT3 (Rabbit) | Abcam, Cambridge, UK | ab30647 |
| Anti-STAT3-P (Rabbit) | Abcam, Cambridge, UK | ab76315 |
| Anti-GFAP (Rabbit, donkey) | Dako, Santa Clara, USA; Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA | Z0334, G9269 |
| Anti-TGFB (Rabbit) | Abcam, Cambridge, UK | ab92486 |
| Anti- NeuN (Mouse) | Millipore, Massachusetts, USA | MAB377 |
| Anti- IBA-1 (Rabbit) | Wako, Richmond, USA | 019–19741 |
| Anti-CD11b (Rabbit) | Abcam, Cambridge, UK | Ab133357 |
| Anti-α-Tubulin (Mouse) | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Texas, USA | Sc-8035 |
| Anti- Ki67 (Rabbit) | Abcam, Cambridge, UK | Ab15580 |
| DAPI | Sigma, Missouri, USA | 32670 |
| Goat anti-Mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 488 | Life Technologies Coorperation Eugene, USA | A11001 |
| Goat anti-Rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 568 | Life Technologies Coorperation Eugene, USA | A11011 |
| Donkey anti-Goat IgG Alexa Fluor 647 | Life Technologies Coorperation Eugene, USA | A21447 |
| Goat anti Rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488 | Life Technologies Coorperation Eugene, USA | A11008 |
| Donkey anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 555 | ThermoFisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA | |
| Goat anti-Mouse IgG-HRP | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Texas, USA | Sc-2005 |
| Goat-anti-Rabbit IgG-HRP | Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Texas, USA | Sc-2004 |
| Mouse-anti-Goat IgG-HRP | Santa Cruz Biotechnology,Texas, USA | Sc-2354 |
| PE/CY5 conjugation kit | Abcam, Cambridge, UK | Ab 102893 |
| APC/CY7 conjugation kit | Abcam, Cambridge, UK | Ab 102859 |
| Ki-67 efluor 660 (SolA15) | ThermoFisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA | 50–5698–82 |
| Chemicals | ||
| NeurobasalTM medium(L-Glutamine) | Gibco, Massachusetts, USA | 21103049 |
| Hibernate-ATM medium | Gibco, Massachusetts, USA | A1247501 |
| D+Glucose | Sigma, Missouri, USA | G8644 |
| N-methyl D-Glucamine (NMDG) | Sigma, Missouri, USA | M2004 |
| GlutamaxTM supplement | Gibco, Massachusetts, USA | 35050061 |
| B-27TM Supplement (50×) | Gibco, Massachusetts, USA | 17504001 |
| Antibiotic-Antimycotic (Anti-Anti) (100×) | Gibco, Massachusetts, USA | 15240062 |
| Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) | Sigma, Missouri, USA | M3409 |
| HEPES | Sigma, Missouri, USA | H0887 |
| TRIzolTM reagent | ThermoFisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA | 15596026 |
| Clodronate disodium (Dichloromethylenediphosphoric acid disodium salt) | Sigma, Missouri, USA | D4434 |
| Ruxolitinib | Adipogen | AG-CRI-3624 |
| Insert | ||
| Millicell inserts (30 mm, 0.4 µm) | Millipore | PICMORG50 |