| Literature DB >> 31186021 |
Amira A H Ali1, Anna Stahr1, Marc Ingenwerth2, Martin Theis3, Christian Steinhäuser3, Charlotte von Gall4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The astroglial connexins Cx30 and Cx43 contribute to many important CNS functions including cognitive behaviour, motoric capacity and regulation of the sleep-wake cycle. The sleep wake cycle, is controlled by the circadian system. The central circadian rhythm generator resides in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). SCN neurons are tightly coupled in order to generate a coherent circadian rhythm. The SCN receives excitatory glutamatergic input from the retina which mediates entrainment of the circadian system to the environmental light-dark cycle. Connexins play an important role in electric coupling of SCN neurons and astrocytic-neuronal signalling that regulates rhythmic SCN neuronal activity. However, little is known about the regulation of Cx30 and Cx43 expression in the SCN, and the role of these connexins in light entrainment of the circadian system and in circadian rhythm generation.Entities:
Keywords: Circadian rhythm; Constant darkness; Constant light; Entrainment; Jet lag; SCN; cFOS
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31186021 PMCID: PMC6560876 DOI: 10.1186/s12964-019-0370-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Commun Signal ISSN: 1478-811X Impact factor: 5.712
List of primary antibodies
| Antibody | Company and order-number | Dilution |
|---|---|---|
| Rabbit anti-Cx43 | Thermo Fisher, 71–0700 | 1:250 |
| Rabbit anti-Cx30 | Thermo Fisher, 71–2200 | 1:1500 |
| Rabbit anti-cFOS | Santa Cruz sc-522,200 | 1:500 |
Fig. 1Relative expression profile of Cx30 and Cx43 mRNA levels under different light regimes. Relative Cx30 (a) and Cx43 (b) mRNA expression levels in the SCN of C57Bl/6 mice at six different time points in 12:12 LD. White bars show light phase, black bars show dark phase. Relative Cx30 (c) and Cx43 (d) mRNA expression levels in the SCN of C57Bl/6 mice at six different time points in constant darkness. Grey bars show former light phase, black bars show former dark phase. Relative Cx30 (e) and Cx43 (f) mRNA expression levels to RN18S in the SCN of C57Bl/6 mice at six different time points in constant light. Data are expressed as mean +/− SEM of n = 3 mice per time point. Significant differences among different time points were analysed by one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s posthoc test. Both, Cx30 (F = 10.1; P = 0.0006) and Cx43 (F = 4.24; P = 0.02) mRNA levels were significantly different among different time points under 12:12 LD conditions. *:p ≤ 0.05 vs. ZT22, ***:p ≤ 0.001 vs. ZT22. There were no significant differences in Cx30 or Cx43 mRNA levels among different time points under DD or LL conditions
Fig. 2Cx43- and Cx30- immunoreaction in the SCN in 12:12 LD. a Representative photomicrographs of Cx30- and Cx43-Immunoreaction (Ir) in the SCN of C57Bl/6 mice kept under 12:12 LD. Scale bar: 300 μm. b Quantification of Cx30-Ir in the SCN. c Quantification of Cx43-Ir in the SCN. Data are expressed as mean +/− SEM of n = 3 mice per time point. Significant differences among different time points were analysed by one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s posthoc test. Both, Cx30- (F = 7.41; P = 0.002) and Cx43- (F = 13.17; P = 0.0002) Ir levels were significantly different among different time points under 12:12 LD conditions. *:P ≤ 0.05 vs. ZT22; **:P ≤ 0.01; ***:P ≤ 0.001 vs. ZT22. White bars indicate the light phase, black bars indicate the dark phase
Fig. 3Cx43- and Cx30- immunoreaction in the SCN in constant darkness (DD). a Representative photomicrographs of Cx30- and Cx43-Immunoreaction (Ir) in the SCN. Scale bar: 300 μm. b Quantification of Cx30-Ir in SCN. c Quantification of Cx43-Ir in SCN. Data are expressed as mean +/− SEM of n = 3 mice per time point. Significant differences among different time points were analysed by one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s posthoc test. Cx43- Ir levels were significantly different (F = 4.67; P = 0.013) among different time points under 12:12 LD conditions. **:P ≤ 0.01 vs. ZT22. Grey bars indicate the former light phase, black bars indicate the former dark phase
Fig. 4Cx43- and Cx30- immunoreaction in the SCN in constant light (LL). a Representative photomicrographs of Cx30- and Cx43-Immunoreaction (Ir) in the SCN of C57Bl/6 mice kept under LL. Scale bar: 300 μm. b Quantification of Cx30-Ir in the SCN. c Quantification of Cx43-Ir in the SCN. Data are expressed as mean +/− SEM of n = 3 mice per time point. Significant differences among different time points were analysed by one way ANOVA. There were no significant differences in Cx30- or Cx43-Ir levels among different time points under LL conditions
Fig. 5Locomotor activity in Cx30/Cx43 double deficient mice. a Representative double-plotted actograms of spontaneous locomotor activity of a WT and a DKO mouse under different light regimes: 12:12 LD (12.1), 6 h advanced phase shift (+ 6), 6 h delayed phase shift (− 6), constant darkness (DD), constant light (LL) and second 12:12 LD (12.2). Black bars show spontaneous locomotor activity in 10 min bins. Grey boxes indicate dark phases. b Analysis of total activity under different light regimes. In LL, total activity was reduced in both, WT and DKO. Activity levels were not different between both genotypes when mice were kept in 12.1, + 6, − 6, DD, LL. However, in 12.2, the total activity was significantly higher in DKO as compared to WT (F = 1.28; T-Test: t = 2.48, P = 0.017). c Analysis of activity counts of WT and DKO during the light and dark phase in 12.1 and 12.2. In 12.2, activity during the dark phase was lower in WT as compared to DKO (F = 3.23; t-Test: t = 2.26, P = 0.04).d Analysis of the circadian period length under different light regimes showed no significant difference between the genotypes. e Analysis of amplitudes of circadian rhythms under different light regimes. There was no significant difference in amplitude between the genotypes in any of the light regimes. In 12.2 the amplitude was significantly higher in DKO as compared to WT (F = 20.09, Mann Whitney test, P = 0.018). Data are expressed as mean + SEM. f Phase angle of entrainment in 12.1, phase advance (+ 6) and phase delay (− 6) is defined as activity onset relative to light off. Phase angle of entrainment in 12.1 and after phase advance (+ 6) was not different between both genotypes. However, in first (F = 38.43, Mann Whitney test, P = 0.007) and second day (F = 11.12, Mann Whitney test; P = 0.046) after phase delay (− 6), the phase angle of entrainment was significantly higher in DKO as compared to WT Data are expressed as mean +/− SEM of n = 6 WT and n = 7 DKO mice. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 WT vs. DKO mice