| Literature DB >> 31185653 |
Brenda Sánchez-Montesinos1, Fernando Diánez2, Alejandro Moreno-Gavira3, Francisco J Gea4, Mila Santos5.
Abstract
This present study evaluates three isolates of Trichoderma as plant growth promoting or biological control agents: Trichoderma aggressivum f. sp. europaeum, Trichoderma saturnisporum, and the marine isolate obtained from Posidonia oceanica, Trichoderma longibrachiatum. The purpose is to contribute to an overall reduction in pesticide residues in the fruit and the environment and to a decrease in chemical fertilizers, the excess of which aggravates one of the most serious abiotic stresses, salinity. The tolerance of the different isolates to increasing concentrations of sodium chloride was evaluated in vitro, as well as their antagonistic capacity against Pythium ultimum. The plant growth promoting capacity and effects of Trichoderma strains on the severity of P. ultimum on melon seedlings under saline conditions were also analysed. The results reveal that the three isolates of Trichoderma, regardless of their origin, alleviate the stress produced by salinity, resulting in larger plants with an air-dry weight percentage above 80% in saline stress conditions for T. longibrachiatum, or an increase in root-dry weight close to 50% when T. aggressivum f. sp. europaeum was applied. Likewise, the three isolates showed antagonistic activity against P. ultimum, reducing the incidence of the disease, with the highest response found for T. longibrachiatum. Biological control of P. ultimum by T. aggressivum f. sp. europaeum and T. saturnisporum is reported for the first time, reducing disease severity by 62.96% and 51.85%, respectively. This is the first description of T. aggressivum f. sp. europaeum as a biological control agent and growth promoter. The application of these isolates can be of enormous benefit to horticultural crops, in both seedbeds and greenhouses.Entities:
Keywords: Pythium ultimum; Trichoderma; biological control; salt tolerance; stress abiotic and biotic
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31185653 PMCID: PMC6603990 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16112053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Trichoderma isolates examined by electron and light microscopy. (A) Conidiophores with conidia of Trichoderma longibrachiatum; (B) Hyphae of Trichoderma saturnisporum; (C) Trichoderma aggressivum colonisation on melon root. (D) T. aggressivum mycelia around mycelium of Pythium ultimum.
Figure 2Mycelial growth (cm) of Trichoderma isolates as affected by different concentrations of NaCl (0–20 g·L−1) and temperatures (25/35 °C). (A) Trichoderma aggressivum f. sp. europaeum. (B) T. longibrachiatum. (C) T. saturnisporum. (D) Pythium ultimum. Mean standard deviation is expressed in error bar (n = 5). For each isolate, columns marked with different letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05.
Figure 3Antagonistic potential of Trichoderma isolates against P. ultimun (Py) in dual culture at different salinity levels on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium. % mycelial inhibition was calculated as PIRG = (R1 − R2) ÷ R1 × 100, where: PIRG: percentage inhibition of radial mycelia growth of the pathogen, R1: radial growth of pathogen in control plates, R2: radial growth of pathogen in dual culture plates. a, b and c Means with the same letter are not significantly different (LSD) according to ANOVA test (p < 0.05).
Morphological parameters of melon plants treated with different doses of NaCl and Trichoderma isolates.
| Treatments Isolate/NaCl (g·L−1) | Aereal Fresh Weight (g) | Root Fresh Weight (g) | Aereal Dry Weight (g) | Root Dry Weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 6.74 ± 1.93 c | 1.61 ± 0.70 b,c | 0.48 ± 0.15 b | 0.09 ± 0.06 b |
|
| 7.92 ± 1.79 a | 2.31 ± 0.50 a | 0.78 ± 0.16 a | 0.13 ± 0.02 a |
|
| 7.01 ± 0.98 b,c | 1.59 ± 0.85 b,c | 0.71 ± 0.12 a | 0.12 ± 0.03 a |
|
| 7.27 ± 1.71 b | 1.74 ± 0.49 b | 0.76 ± 0.07 a | 0.10 ± 0.04 a,b |
|
| 6.94 ± 1.80 b | 1.42 ± 0.42 b | 0.37 ± 0.09 c | 0.07 ± 0.03 b |
|
| 7.19 ± 1.77 a,b | 1.68 ± 0.54 a | 0.55 ± 0.11 b | 0.08 ± 0.02 a,b |
|
| 7.49 ± 1.34 a | 1.70 ± 0.61 a | 0.66 ± 0.16 a,b | 0.09 ± 0.02 a |
|
| 7.05 ± 1.22 b | 1.39 ± 0.48 a,b | 0.69 ± 0.23 a | 0.08 ± 0.03 a,b |
|
| 5.32 ± 1.45 b | 0.93 ± 0.55 b | 0.39 ± 0.18 b | 0.07 ± 0.03 a,b |
|
| 6.01 ± 1.30 a | 1.02 ± 0.35 b | 0.49 ± 0.11 a,b | 0.06 ± 0.02 c |
|
| 5.90 ± 1.05 a,b | 1.46 ± 0.42 a | 0.76 ± 0.12 a | 0.10 ± 0.01 a |
|
| 6.30 ± 2.43 a | 1.35 ± 0.46 a | 0.77 ± 0.16 a | 0.07 ± 0.03 a,b |
|
| 5.26 ± 1.40 c | 0.67 ± 0.35 c | 0.39 ± 0.09 c | 0.07 ± 0.04 a,b |
|
| 5.57 ± 1.03 b | 1.02 ± 0.24 b | 0.50 ± 0.15 b | 0.05 ± 0.02 b |
|
| 7.43 ± 1.79 a | 1.27 ± 0.25 a | 0.63 ± 0.18 a | 0.09 ± 0.02 a |
|
| 5.07 ± 0.87 c | 1.04 ± 0.23 b | 0.50 ± 0.11 b | 0.08 ± 0.02 a |
|
| 5.22 ± 1.12 c | 0.55 ± 0.28 b | 0.44 ± 0.14 b | 0.07 ± 0.03 a |
|
| 5.82 ± 0.83 b | 0.72 ± 0.28 a | 0.51 ± 0.13 a | 0.05 ± 0.02 b |
|
| 6.35 ± 1.00 a | 1.08 ± 0.21 a | 0.58 ± 0.08 a | 0.07 ± 0.03 a |
|
| 5.42 ± 1.18 b,c | 0.82 ± 0.33 a | 0.49 ± 0.12 a,b | 0.07 ± 0.03 a |
a, b, c Values of a column followed by the same letters have no significant difference at 5% (LSD test).
Figure 4Disease incidence of P. ultimum in melon plants was rated 30 days after inoculation based on a 0–4 scale: where 0 = no visible disease symptoms and 4 = plant dead. Mean standard deviation is expressed in error bar (n = 10). a, b, c Means with the same letter are not significantly different (LSD) according to ANOVA test (p < 0.05).