Literature DB >> 16933644

Air emission inventories in North America: a critical assessment.

C Andrew Miller1, George Hidy, Jeremy Hales, Charles E Kolb, Arthur S Werner, Bernd Haneke, David Parrish, H Christopher Frey, Leonora Rojas-Bracho, Marc Deslauriers, Bill Pennell, J David Mobley.   

Abstract

Although emission inventories are the foundation of air quality management and have supported substantial improvements in North American air quality, they have a number of shortcomings that can potentially lead to ineffective air quality management strategies. Major reductions in the largest emissions sources have made accurate inventories of previously minor sources much more important to the understanding and improvement of local air quality. Changes in manufacturing processes, industry types, vehicle technologies, and metropolitan infrastructure are occurring at an increasingly rapid pace, emphasizing the importance of inventories that reflect current conditions. New technologies for measuring source emissions and ambient pollutant concentrations, both at the point of emissions and from remote platforms, are providing novel approaches to collecting data for inventory developers. Advances in information technologies are allowing data to be shared more quickly, more easily, and processed and compared in novel ways that can speed the development of emission inventories. Approaches to improving quantitative measures of inventory uncertainty allow air quality management decisions to take into account the uncertainties associated with emissions estimates, providing more accurate projections of how well alternative strategies may work. This paper discusses applications of these technologies and techniques to improve the accuracy, timeliness, and completeness of emission inventories across North America and outlines a series of eight recommendations aimed at inventory developers and air quality management decision-makers to improve emission inventories and enable them to support effective air quality management decisions for the foreseeable future.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16933644     DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  4 in total

Review 1.  Reflecting on progress since the 2005 NARSTO emissions inventory report.

Authors:  Melissa Day; George Pouliot; Sherri Hunt; Kirk R Baker; Megan Beardsley; Gregory Frost; David Mobley; Heather Simon; Barron B Henderson; Tiffany Yelverton; Venkatesh Rao
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.235

2.  Differences between measured and reported volatile organic compound emissions from oil sands facilities in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Shao-Meng Li; Amy Leithead; Samar G Moussa; John Liggio; Michael D Moran; Daniel Wang; Katherine Hayden; Andrea Darlington; Mark Gordon; Ralf Staebler; Paul A Makar; Craig A Stroud; Robert McLaren; Peter S K Liu; Jason O'Brien; Richard L Mittermeier; Junhua Zhang; George Marson; Stewart G Cober; Mengistu Wolde; Jeremy J B Wentzell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Identifying potential exposure reduction priorities using regional rankings based on emissions of known and suspected carcinogens to outdoor air in Canada.

Authors:  Eleanor M Setton; Basil Veerman; Anders Erickson; Steeve Deschenes; Roz Cheasley; Karla Poplawski; Paul A Demers; C Peter Keller
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.984

4.  A Survey of Soil Enzyme Activities along Major Roads in Beijing: The Implications for Traffic Corridor Green Space Management.

Authors:  Tianxin Li; Linglong Meng; Uwizeyimana Herman; Zhongming Lu; John Crittenden
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.