| Literature DB >> 31184454 |
Angela Mazzeo1, Anna Paula Weinhardt Baptista Sincos1, Katia Ramos Moreira Leite2, Miguel Angelo Góes1,3, Oscar Fernando Santos Dos Pavão1, Oskar Grau Kaufmann1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to study morphological and renal structural changes in relation to different ischemic times and types of renal vascular pedicle clamping.Entities:
Keywords: Ischemia; Kidney; Nephrectomy
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31184454 PMCID: PMC6837590 DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0559
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Braz J Urol ISSN: 1677-5538 Impact factor: 1.541
Figure 1A) Tubular degenerative changes; B) pigmented cylinders; C) vascular congestion and edema; D) interstitial neutrophilic infiltrate; E) interstitial haemorrhage. All histological findings were stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin technique and analyzed under light microscopy.
Figure 2From left to right, the following cellular changes are observed as a function of the ischemia and type of clamping: degenerative tubular alteration, interstitial inflammatory infiltrate, interstitial hemorrhage, pigmented cylinders and vascular congestion.
Estimated proportions for the presence of lesion in the biopsies performed.
| Comparison (min x Basal) | Study groups | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Artery and vein | Artery | |||
|
| ||||
| Control Kidney | Ischemic Kidney | Control kidney | Ischemic kidney | |
| 10 | 0.555 | 0.102 | 0.046 | 0.028 |
| 20 | 0.137 | 0.038 | 0.003 | <0.001 |
| 30 | 0.135 | 0.004 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| 40 | 0.094 | <0.001 | 0.003 | <0.001 |
| 50 | 0.008 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 60 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.003 | <0.001 |
| 70 | 0.019 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 80 | 0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| 90 | 0.137 | <0.001 | 0.025 | 0.002 |
P values corrected by the sequential Bonferroni method
Results of multiple comparisons between moments regarding the presence of lesions using Bonferroni Method with p value <0.001.
| Basal (min) | Clamping type | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Artery and vein | Artery | |||||
|
| ||||||
| Control kidney n (%) | Ischemic kidney n (%) | Control kidney n (%) | Ischemic kidney n (%) | |||
| 0 | 10.0 (3.5) | 7.5 (4.9) | 10.0 (7.1) | 17.5 (6.6) | ||
| 10 | 7.5 (3.4) | 12.5 (4.9) | 20.0 (3.5)* | 32.5 (4.9)* | ||
| 20 | 20.0 (5.0) | 25.0 (5.9)* | 30.0 (6.1)* | 42.5 (6.6)* | ||
| 30 | 27.5 (7.0)* | 32.5 (4.9)* | 42.5 (7.4)* | 45.0 (5.9)* | ||
| 40 | 27.5 (6.1)* | 37.5 (5.5)* | 40.0 (5.0)* | 47.5 (7.0)* | ||
| 50 | 30.0 (5.0)* | 37.5 (6.6)* | 45.0 (6.8)* | 55.0 (5.9)* | ||
| 60 | 37.5 (8.2)* | 40.0 (7.1)* | 45.0 (6.8)* | 50.0 (7.1)* | ||
| 70 | 35.0 (8.5)* | 47.5 (7.0)* | 50.0 (8.7)* | 50.0 (5.0)* | ||
| 80 | 37.5 (5.5)* | 45.0 (7.7)* | 52.5 (7.9)* | 57.5 (4.2)* | ||
| 90 | 30.0 (9.4)* | 47.5 (7.0)* | 45.0 (8.5)* | 52.5 (8.6)* | ||
*Significant difference in relation to basal time. Data represent estimated proportions and standard errors obtained with the general estimative equation model.
Figure 3Distribution of the proportion of biopsies with presence of lesion.