| Literature DB >> 31182962 |
Yoshiaki Nomura1, Khin Maung2, Eint Min Kay Khine2, Khin Myo Sint2, May Phyo Lin2, Min Khaing Win Myint2, Thu Aung2, Kaoru Sogabe1, Ryoko Otsuka1, Ayako Okada3, Erika Kakuta4, Wit Yee Wint5, Masahide Uraguchi1, Ryo Hasegawa6, Nobuhiro Hanada1.
Abstract
There are no national data available of the oral health in Myanmar. In this study, we examined dental caries status of 187 school children located in the suburban area of Naypyidaw, capital of Myanmar, at the age of five and six and analyzed by the individual level and tooth level. Maxillary D and B were sensitive for dental caries almost at the same level. They were less sensitive than maxillary A. Mandibular A and B were tolerant for dental caries. Prevalence of dental caries in Myanmar children was still high. By applying item response theory and multilevel modeling, tooth level analysis can be implemented to confirm the tendency for sensitivity or tolerance for dental caries by the tooth level.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31182962 PMCID: PMC6512070 DOI: 10.1155/2019/5948379
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Dent ISSN: 1687-8728
Figure 1Distribution of dmf of the 187 Myanmar children aged 5 and 6. Even though the mode was 0, 152 (81.3%) subjects had at least one def tooth. The mean ± SD and median and 25th to 75th percentile were 4.26 ± 3.76 and 4 (1–7), respectively.
Tooth-level distribution of dental caries in primary teeth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sound | 147 | 104 | 171 | 134 | 109 | 113 | 138 | 172 | 110 | 153 | 109 | 114 | 180 | 165 | 137 | 143 | 168 | 180 | 110 | 105 |
| Caries | 40 | 76 | 15 | 40 | 52 | 51 | 41 | 15 | 75 | 34 | 75 | 71 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 77 | 78 |
| Filled | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Missing due to caries | 0 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Exfoliation | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 20 | 20 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 46 | 42 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bold numbers indicate the tooth kind by the WHO standard code. Almost no treated teeth were observed. Most of the permanent teeth were not erupted.
Tooth-level distribution of dental caries in permanent teeth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sound | 0 | 42 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 43 | 39 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 0 |
| Dental caries | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Not erupted | 187 | 144 | 187 | 186 | 187 | 184 | 171 | 172 | 184 | 187 | 186 | 187 | 142 | 187 | 187 | 124 | 187 | 187 | 187 | 174 | 144 | 148 | 175 | 187 | 187 | 187 | 126 | 187 |
Bold numbers indicate the tooth kind by the WHO standard code. Almost no treated teeth were observed. Most of the permanent teeth were not erupted.
Sensitivity of dental caries of deciduous teeth by item response theory (IRT) analysis.
| Item discrimination ( | Item difficulty ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate | SE | |||
| Maxillary | E | 0.848 | 0.145 | 0.021 |
| D | −0.225 | 0.129 | 0.017 | |
| C | 1.632 | 0.195 | 0.038 | |
| B | 0.806 | 0.145 | 0.021 | |
| A | 0.441 | 0.139 | 0.019 | |
|
| ||||
| Mandibular | E | −0.098 | 0.128 | 0.016 |
| D | −0.061 | 0.128 | 0.016 | |
| C | 2.291 | 0.265 | 0.070 | |
| B | 2.846 | 0.371 | 0.138 | |
| A | 2.690 | 0.370 | 0.137 | |
Two parameter logistic models were applied for analysis. Item discrimination (a) indicated the slope of the item response curve shown in Figure 2, and the item difficulty (b) indicated the rising phase of the curve. Lower values indicate high sensitivity for dental varies (easy-to-be dental caries) in both item discrimination and item difficulty. Higher values indicate high tolerance for dental varies (hard-to-be dental caries).
Figure 2Item response curve of the sensitivity for dental caries of deciduous teeth. Horizontal axis indicates the total score of dental caries which is standardized as the def; 99% of def were transformed into −4 to 4. Vertical axis indicates the percent of subjects with dental caries for each tooth. When the ability (total score of dental caries) is fixed, prevalence of dental caries can be estimated. The curve located left side indicated that the teeth are highly susceptible to dental caries. The curve located right side indicated that the teeth are highly tolerant to dental caries.
Results of multilevel modeling for the prevalence of dental caries at the tooth level.
| Coefficient | 95% CI |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 1.125 | 0.168–2.082 | 0.024 | |
| Age | −0.127 | −0.307–0.054 | 0.157 | |
| Male | Reference | |||
| Female | 0.077 | −0.076–0.231 | 0.302 | |
| Maxillary | Molar | Reference | ||
| Canine | 0.897 | 0.589–1.206 | <0.001 | |
| Anterior | 0.063 | −0.141–0.268 | 0.522 | |
| Mandibular | Molar | −0.277 | −0.473–−0.082 | 0.008 |
| Canine | 1.295 | 0.913–1.676 | <0.001 | |
| Anterior | 1.607 | 1.224–1.991 | <0.001 |
The fitness index of AIC is 145.718 and of BIC is 195.096. Each tooth was nested in each subjects. To analyze this hierarchal structure, multilevel analysis is indispensable. The coefficients showed the same tendency shown in IRT analysis in Table 2. Most eminent difference of these results from IRT was the adjustment of confoundings like age and gender.