Early childhood caries among 5- to 6-year-old children in Southeast Asia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and experience of early childhood caries among 5- to 6-year-old children in Southeast Asia.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted of three electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science) to identify publications from the years 2006 to 2015. Additional hand searches of government reports and national studies were performed. Both primary and secondary data sources were included in the study. The inclusion criterion was the findings reported on the caries prevalence and/or caries experience in decayed, missing or filled tooth (dmft) or decayed, missing or filled surface (dmfs) scores of 5- to 6-year-old children in Southeast Asian countries. The papers retrieved were assessed by two independent reviewers, and the final decision was made by consensus.
RESULTS: The search identified 320 papers for screening; 293 were excluded and 27 full papers were retrieved and reviewed. Of those, 12 were included. Among the countries, variations were found in caries prevalence and caries experience. The caries prevalence of 5- to 6-year-old children ranged from 25% to 95%, and the caries experience (given as mean dmft score) ranged from 0.9 to 9.0. The median caries prevalence and caries experience (mean dmft score) of children 5-6 years of age were 79% and 5.1, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Based on the included studies, which are limited in quality and quantity, there is evidence that caries prevalence and experience are high amongst preschool children in Southeast Asia.

Introduction

Dental caries affecting the primary teeth in preschool children [also known as early childhood caries (ECC)] is prevalent, especially among underprivileged groups in developing countries1., 2.. Dental caries has often been described as a global pandemic disease characterised by a high proportion of untreated carious lesions. ECC can affect the general health of children, as well as their quality of life. Such problems are potentially serious, and may even be life-threatening. Although the caries status of permanent teeth in 12-year-old children in the Southeast Asian region has been documented in the database of the World Health Organization (WHO), epidemiological data on ECC are limited. Studies have reported trends of ECC in Arab League countries, Latin America and the Caribbean, but there are no such findings for Southeast Asian countries.

In Southeast Asia, there are around 600 million people, or approximately 9% of the world's population, with Indonesia having the largest population in the region and the fourth largest population in the world. The demographic, socio-economic and health-care profiles of the Southeast Asian countries are summarised in Table 1. The definition of ‘Southeast Asia’ mostly refers to the areas represented by 11 sovereign states, namely Brunei, Burma (Myanmar), Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR), Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam and Timor-Leste (East Timor). Ten countries (all except Timor-Leste) are members of the Association of Southeast Asia Nations (ASEAN). Most countries in Southeast Asia are classified as developing countries, which are defined according to their gross national income (GNI) per capita per year of US$ 11,905 or less. The diversity in economics and politics across and within countries in Southeast Asia may contribute to the disparate health status and the diversity of the health systems, which are at different stages of evolution.

Table 1

Profiles of Southeast Asian countries

Country	Capital name	Land (km2)	Population	Life expectancy (year)	Underweight of children under 5 years (%)	Health expenditure (% of GDP)	GDP per capita (PPP) USD	GNI per capita USD53
Brunei Darussalam	Bandar Seri Begawan	5,765	430,000	77	–	2.5	73,200	37,320
Cambodia	Phnom Penh	181,035	15,709,000	64	29	7.5	3,300	1,020
Indonesia	Jakarta	1,904,569	255,994,000	72	20	3.1	10,600	3,630
Lao PDR	Vientiane	236,800	6,912,000	64	27	2	5,000	1,650
Malaysia	Kuala Lumpur	329,847	30,514,000	75	13	4	24,700	10,760
Myanmar	Yangon	676,578	56,320,000	66	23	1.8	4,700	1,270
Philippines	Manila	300,000	100,998,000	69	20	4.4	7,000	3,470
Singapore	Singapore	697	5,674,000	85	–	4.6	82,800	55,150
Thailand	Bangkok	513,120	67,946,000	74	9	4.6	14,400	5,370
Timor Leste	Dili	14,874	1,231,000	68	45	1.3	4,900	3,120
Vietnam	Hanoi	331,210	94,349,000	73	12	6	5,600	1,890

Source of information: www.cia.gov.

GDP (PPP), gross domestic product (purchasing power parity); GNI, gross national income; USD, US dollars.

In 2006, the Global Child Dental Health Taskforce (GCDHT) was established in response to the Declaration on Child Oral Health that was signed by the chief dental officers of most European countries, along with a representative from the WHO. The GCDHT aims to raise the profile of the global crisis of dental caries among disadvantaged children. In addition, global goals for oral health in 2020 have been recently established by the WHO, World Dental Federation (FDI) and the International Association of Dental Research (IADR). A summary of epidemiological data for oral diseases is required to determine risks to populations, respond with prevention and intervention, and plan for the future. Small epidemiological surveys carried out in Cambodia (2003–2007) and in Lao PDR (2010) indicate that the prevalence of ECC is very high. Because the cultural and social contexts of the health system in Southeast Asia are unique, up-to-date oral health data from the region are needed in order to develop effective oral health programmes that are suitable for the needs of Southeast Asian populations. This study aimed to summarise the updated data about the caries prevalence and severity of ECC of 5- to 6-year-old children in Southeast Asia. The term ‘ECC’ in the present study was defined as the presence of one or more decayed cavitated lesions or missing (as a result of caries) or filled tooth surfaces in any primary tooth in a child 5–6 years of age.

Materials and Methods

Search strategy

Identification of studies to be considered for inclusion was based on a systematic search of three common electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science). The keywords and MeSH headings were combined using three main concepts: Dental caries [MeSH Terms] AND Children [MeSH Terms] AND Southeast Asia [MeSH Terms] OR Thailand [MeSH Terms] OR Cambodia [MeSH Terms] OR Vietnam [MeSH Terms] OR Indonesia [MeSH Terms] OR Malaysia [MeSH Terms] OR Singapore [MeSH Terms] OR Philippines [MeSH Terms] OR Brunei [MeSH Terms] OR Myanmar [MeSH Terms] OR ‘Lao PDR’ OR ‘Laos’ OR East Timor [MeSH Terms]. The search was restricted to reports written in English. Data from secondary sources, such as government reports, conference proceedings and statistics, accessed through the websites of national institutes, were searched. Additional records were identified by contacting the delegates of the Southeast Asian delegates in the South East Association for Dental Education (SEAADE). Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied by examining the title and abstract. Lists of eligible references were manually searched.

Study selection

Publications were included if they fulfilled the following inclusion criteria:

Cross-sectional studies or prospective cohort studies

Primary or secondary data analyses

Papers published from 2006–2015

Examination of children, 5–6 years of age, in Southeast Asian countries

Reporting caries prevalence and/or caries experience of primary teeth. Caries prevalence was expressed as a percentage of the child population affected by dental caries, whereas caries experience of primary teeth was expressed as mean decayed, missing and filled teeth or tooth surfaces (dmft and/or dmfs score).

The literature searches of the three common electronic databases were performed independently by two reviewers (D.D. and S.S.G.). Titles and abstracts of the publications were identified for eligibility. Papers were excluded if a group of samples was not reasonably representative of the general population of children, such as groups of disabled children. Data of randomised controlled clinical trials were excluded. Where doubts existed over the inclusion of a study based on the title or abstract, the full paper was retrieved. For example, if the abstract reported a wide range of participant ages, the full text of this article was retrieved and then checked for available data (children 5 and 6 years of age) for subgroup analysis. Duplicated reports or studies using the same data were excluded.

In addition, the references of the included studies considered eligible were searched manually in order to find other relevant studies in the final analysis. A summary of each record was made according to: (i) countries; (ii) sources of information (year of publication); (iii) area/detail of study; (iv) year of survey; (v) sampling method; (vi) caries diagnostic criteria; (vii) sample size; (viii) age of participants; (ix) caries prevalence (expressed in per cent); and (x) mean dmft score.

Results

A total of 545 publications were found in the literature search of the three databases (PubMed, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science). Nine additional records from conference proceedings were identified. From this, 320 de-duplicated records were screened manually on the basis of the title, keywords and abstract. Among these, 293 did not meet the inclusion criteria, such as reporting only caries status in permanent teeth, being published in earlier years and assessing the oral health of children with disabilities. Consequently, 27 full papers were retrieved and reviewed. No cross-referencing studies were found. Of these 27 papers, 15 were excluded, the majority because of the ages of the children studied and repeated data. The remaining 12 publications were included in the present study. A flow chart of identification and study selection is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Flow diagram for identification, screening and study selection.

The details contained in the included studies on the caries status of primary teeth in preschool children are summarised in Table 2. Of the 12 studies included, only four (33%) were primary data analyses15., 17., 18., 19.. Regarding the data from secondary sources, data of national oral health surveys on preschool children were found for five countries, namely Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Lao PDR and Cambodia. All included studies reported both caries prevalence and experience (dmft score). Most (92%) of the included studies indicated the year of the survey. Regarding the type of study, all were cross-sectional. Of 12 studies, only four (33%) described the sampling methods and caries diagnostic criteria15., 17., 18., 19..

Table 2

Caries prevalence and caries experience in primary teeth of 5- to 6-year-old children in Southeast Asia

Country	Authors/year	Area/details of study	Year of survey	Sampling method	Diagnostic criteria	Sample size	Age/year	% Caries	dmft (SD)
Brunei Darussalam	Hua20	Schools	2012	–	–	–	5	59	3.9
Cambodia	Souen et al.28	National Oral Health Survey	2011	–	–	–	5–6	93	9.0
	Chu et al.15	Rural areas	2003–2007	Convenience sample	WHO	120	6	91	7.9 (5.2)
Indonesia	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Lao PDR	Phommavongsa & Senesombath27	National Oral Health Survey	2010	–	–	–	6	89	8.0
Malaysia	Khairiyah et al.21	National Oral Health Survey	2007	–	–	–	6	75	3.9
Myanmar	Chu et al.18	Rural areas	2009	Convenience sample	WHO	95	5	25	0.9 (2.3)
	San22	City areas	2006–2007	–	–	1,571	5	75	4.6
Philippines	Centeno26	National Oral Health survey	2011	–	–	586	5	88	5.6
Singapore	Gao et al.17	Kindergartens in Singapore	2005	Stratified cluster random sample	WHO	697	5–6	49	2.0 (3.1)
Thailand	Krisdapong et al.19	Bangkok	–	Stratified cluster random sample	WHO	503	5–6	79	6.2 (5.2)
	Jienmaneechotechai et al.23	National Oral Health Survey	2012	–	–	–	5–6	79	4.4
Timor-Leste	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Vietnam	Hai & Khanh25	Hanoi and Lao Cai	2007	–	–	75	6	95	6.3
		FluoridatedA and non-fluoridatedB areas in Ho Chi Minh	2010	–	–	–	5	62A84B	3.4A6.8B

A, Fluoridated area; B, Non-fluoridated area; dmft, decayed, missing and filled teeth index for the primary dentition; SD, standard deviation; WHO, World Health Organisation.

Within the included studies published in 2006–2015, there was a wide range of caries prevalence (25–95%) and caries experience (dmft score = 0.9–9.0) in 5- to 6-year-old children in Southeast Asia; for the same age group, the median caries prevalence was 79% and caries experience (in dmft) was 5.1. In Singapore and Brunei, caries prevalence and caries experience (expressed as mean dmft score) of preschool children in Brunei and Singapore were lower than those of other countries in the region, while preschool children in the Philippines, Lao PDR and Cambodia had very high caries prevalence (>85%). The distribution of up-to-date-caries prevalence (%) and caries experience (mean dmft score) in 5- to 6-year-old children in Southeast Asian countries in 2006–2015 are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Caries prevalence (%) and caries experience [decayed, missing and filled teeth (dmft) index] of primary teeth in children 5–6 years of age in Southeast Asia in 2006–2015.

Singapore: Caries prevalence was 49%. Caries experience in mean dmft and dmfs scores were 2.0 and 4.4, respectively. Approximately 90% of the affected teeth were decayed teeth. A skewed distribution of dental caries was found

Brunei Darussalam: Only one review was found. It reported a decline in caries prevalence in 5-year-old children from 89% in 1999 to 59% in 2012, and the mean dmft scores decreased from 7.0 to 3.9

Malaysia: There was a national oral health survey on 6-year-old children in 2007. Caries prevalence decreased from 81% in 1997 to 75% in 2007. Overall, the mean dmft score was 3.9 in 2007. The ‘filling’ component (0.5) remained quite low, indicating a treatment need in relation to the high ‘decay’ component (3.2) in young children in Malaysia

Myanmar: There was no report on the national oral health survey. However, there were oral health surveys sponsored by an international organisation (Asia Oral Health Promotion Fund) in collaboration with the Myanmar Dental Association. Caries prevalence varied between 25% and 75%, with the mean dmft scores ranging between 0.9 and 4.618., 22.

Thailand: National oral health surveys are conducted regularly (about every 5 years). The latest national survey, in 2012, showed that 79% of 5-year-old children had dental caries experience. Another study by Krisdapong et al. reported similar findings. Overall, dental caries was highly prevalent, with the mean dmft score ranging from 4.4 to 6.2

Vietnam: The national oral health survey published in 2011 was excluded as participants were older than 6 years of age. Only one review reported the caries status of preschool children in some provinces. In Ho Chi Minh City, the caries prevalence of 5- to 6-year-old children in a non-fluoridated area was higher (84%) than that in a fluoridated area (63%). In Hanoi and Lao Cai provinces, caries prevalence was very high (95%), with a mean dmft score of 6.3

Philippines: A review of the national oral health survey in 2011 indicated that caries prevalence (88%) was high amongst 5-year-old children, with a mean dmft score of 5.6

Lao PDR: Results of the national oral health survey in 2010 reported high caries prevalence (89%), and the mean dmft score was 8.0

Cambodia: Two studies were identified in the literature search. Caries prevalence in both studies was over 90%, and the mean dmft scores of 5-year-old children ranged between 7.9 and 9.015., 28.. Very few primary teeth had been restored or extracted in Cambodia

Indonesia and Timor-Leste: No studies conducted on children 5–6 years of age were found.

Discussion

This systematic review demonstrates a paucity of up-to-date data on the prevalence and severity of ECC in Southeast Asian countries in the last 10 years. Based on the data available and its limitations, the present review demonstrates high caries prevalence with a high level of caries severity (dmft score) for ECC in Southeast Asia. Compared with other countries in Asia, the prevalence of ECC in Southeast Asia was more likely to be higher than that in Hong Kong (51%), China (66%) and India (54%). When comparing the prevalence of ECC in developed countries, studies in Southeast Asia reported a much higher prevalence of ECC than those in developed countries, such as the USA (23%) or the UK (28%). Regarding the oral health status of children in other regions, a systematic review in Arab League countries reported a mean dmft score of 4.5 in 2- to 7- year-old children. In South Africa and Swaziland, the prevalence of ECC among 5- to 6-year-old children was comparatively low (57%), and the mean dmft score was 3.1. Compared with these findings, the overall caries status of preschool children in Southeast Asian countries is worse than for those in diverse parts of the world. These high-caries-risk children, especially those from the less-developed countries in Southeast Asia, such as Cambodia and Lao PDR, should receive special attention. In addition, the high level of untreated caries in the primary dentition is of major concern. This phenomenon is almost universal in Southeast Asia. A recent systematic review indicated that untreated caries in primary teeth is prevalent, affecting over 600 million children worldwide. Regrettably, studies on ECC and risk factors in Southeast Asia remain largely under-represented in the literature, although this region shoulders a disproportionate caries burden. Globally, oral disease is the fourth most expensive disease to treat; there is a challenge to develop effective oral health-care strategies in a way that respects cultural sensitivities and socio-economic constraints.

Variations exist in the trends of ECC across countries. Within Southeast Asian countries, preschool children in countries with a low GNI (e.g. Cambodia and Lao PDR) are more likely to have higher caries prevalence than are those in countries with a high GNI (e.g. Singapore and Brunei). The results of the present review agree with Do that caries experience is more widespread within populations of lower socio-economic status. This may be a result of the distinct risk profiles across countries, such as availability of oral health care, socio-economic status and probably a lack of political attention, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. The population-to-dentist ratio in Southeast Asia ranges widely, from 1,700 to 50,000. Besides the shortage of dental health workers, problems of maldistribution of health professionals are present in all countries in Southeast Asia, and remote areas are often underserved and understaffed. This calls for action and strategy to address the inequalities in child oral health in the region. Questions remain about how to improve the oral health of disadvantaged children in vulnerable communities. The results of this study could provide the updated baseline information that is an important prerequisite for oral professionals and policy makers when developing effective approaches for the child populations across the nations in Southeast Asia.

Certain limitations in the present review should be borne in mind when interpreting the results. The first is the age of the child population. Ideally, oral health surveys on primary dentition should be performed on children 5 years of age, as recommended by the WHO, because at this age children have fully erupted primary teeth without natural tooth exfoliation. Studies on 6-year-old children were also considered in this review in order to include more data. For better comparison, a more specific age group may be needed because caries experience is more likely to increase with increasing age of children. In addition, data on younger children with incomplete primary dentition or on older children with mixed dentition may not be comparable with data on 5- to 6-year-old children. The second limitation is language bias, which might be present because we focussed on papers published in English. Although data of national oral health surveys might be accessible from the survey documentations in some countries, the language restriction of this review would preclude studies or national surveys that were not published in English. Only four studies that had collected primary data were found in the databases for the time period spanning 2006 to 2015. Surprisingly, no ECC study on children 5–6 years of age in Indonesia was found in this review, despite its relatively large population. Also, Timor-Leste, which is a new country, had no publications on ECC. Official statistics, such as national surveys published in English in peer-reviewed by journals, were also rare.

Fortunately, a number of publications included from the conference ‘Caries Control throughout Life in Asia’, held in Southeast Asia, were found and included in the review. Compared with primary data, secondary data, including information from the national population, are more likely to be representative. However, details of survey methods, such as sample size calculation, caries diagnostic criteria and calibration of examiners, were absent from the included studies that used secondary data. Owing to the methodological diversity of the oral health surveys and incomplete analyses of secondary data, further analysis could not be performed. It was also impossible to assess the quality of the included studies that used secondary data. Regarding the definition of ‘Southeast Asia’, 11 sovereign states, which are commonly recognised as Southeast Asian nations, were all included in this review. However, some small dependent territories, such as Christmas Island and the Coco Islands, which are geographically considered as part of Southeast Asia, were not included in the present study. In addition, the scope of this review was limited to papers published in the last 10 years (2006–2015) in order to summarise the up-to-date information available on ECC. Any ECC trends in earlier years should not be extrapolated from the present findings.

Dental public health interventions need tailoring to achieve effective caries-prevention strategies and reduce any social gradient in oral health. Despite the limitations discussed, this current systemic review thus fills an epidemiological information gap and can provide an updated overall picture of caries prevalence and level of caries severity in young children. Because of the lack of high quality studies and small numbers of oral health surveys in preschool children in Southeast Asia, methodologically rigorous surveys carried out at regular time intervals are needed to create a more accurate profile of ECC in the region. Common risk factors affecting ECC in Southeast Asia should be further investigated.

It is hoped that the results of the present study will help to raise awareness of the burden of ECC and inequalities in child oral health in Southeast Asia, as well as elicit interest and support of local government and other policy-making authorities in promoting oral health in this region. Population approaches to primary caries prevention are required. Because no cooperation of the population is needed, these measures have a significant impact, particularly in disadvantaged and deprived populations. Water-fluoridation programmes have proven successful in dental caries reduction in many countries. Similarly, the effect of water fluoridation on caries reduction was also reported in Southeast Asian countries, such as in Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam, Singapore and Vietnam. Besides this population-based preventive measure, oral self-care by daily toothbrushing with a fluoridated toothpaste is important for preventing and arresting dental caries in preschool children. Surprisingly, only 44% of 6-year-old children had brushed their teeth in Cambodia. Affordable fluoridated toothpaste should be promoted in less-developed nations. Well-organised community-based programmes and dissemination of appropriate oral health messages through different means should be combined to improve oral health in young children.

For secondary-prevention measures, advances in oral health science, which are usually unaffordable or inaccessible, may not benefit poor and disadvantaged child populations. Discerning how to manage the heavy burden of untreated dental caries in the young child population is challenging. Caries management with minimally invasive approaches and low cost is of utmost importance. Atraumatic restorative treatment with high-viscosity glass ionomer cements and the use of silver diamine fluoride have recently been considered as therapeutic options for caries control in young children. This is because of their efficacy and feasibility of implementation in communities48., 49., 50.. More studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of these interventions in high-caries-risk preschool children in Southeast Asia.

The lack of fully effective mechanisms for regional health cooperation remains in Southeast Asia. Eliminating oral health inequalities cannot be accomplished by isolating oral health from overall health. Framing oral health as an essential part of general health is required to integrate oral health into a broader global health that facilitates interactions with other health professions and with other public sectors. In addition, partnerships must be strengthened amongst oral health professionals, both regionally and internationally.

Conclusion

Based on the evidence stemming from the included studies that are of limited quantity and quality, there is a wide variation in caries status of preschool children across countries. The prevalence and severity of ECC remains substantial in most countries in Southeast Asia. More attention should be drawn to reducing the burden of ECC, especially in less developed countries.

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the General Research Fund (number: 17107315) of the University Grant Council, Hong Kong.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.