| Literature DB >> 31182918 |
Ji Ma1,2,3, Hongli Yin1,2,3, Maoru Li1,2,3, Yang Deng1,2,3, Owais Ahmad4, Guohong Qin1,2,3, Qiangqiang He5, Jiajing Li1,2,3, Kai Gao6, Junyi Zhu1,2,3, Bing Wang1,2,3, Susu Wu1,2,3, Tao Wang7, Jing Shang1,2,3,5.
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease around the world. However, there is still no drug for NAFLD in the market, the study of potential therapeutic drugs on NAFLD is extraordinarily pressing and urgent. The rodent models for NAFLD drugs' study are always with a long time cost. Therefore, we aim to establish a short-time NAFLD drug screening model. A laboratory-made high cholesterol diet was used on larval zebrafish for 3 weeks to establish the NAFLD screen model. Lipid metabolism, oxidant stress, and pathology were studied to comprehensively demonstrate the whole spectrum of NAFLD on this model. Bezafibrate and pioglitazone were used to evaluate the model. Moreover, mechanism research was performed on this model.The NAFLD larval zebrafish model was established with the comprehensive process of NAFLD. Moreover, multiple index on lipid metabolism, oxidant stress, hepatic steatosis, and hepatic inflammation can be easily tested for drug screening. Furthermore, this model can be used to perform the mechanism research by testing mRNA expression. The NAFLD larval zebrafish model is a comprehensive short-time screening method for NAFLD drugs.Entities:
Keywords: high cholesterol diet; larval zebrafish; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31182918 PMCID: PMC6535789 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.30013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Figure 1Effect of high cholesterol diet on metabolic profiles and lipid accumulation in larval zebrafish. (A) Experimental outline of HCD induced NAFLD larval zebrafish. (B) Survival rate of larval zebrafish (n=3). (C) Width changes of larval zebrafish (D) TC level of larval zebrafish (n=6). (E) TG level of larval zebrafish(n=6). (F) Nile red stain of larval zebrafish. Bar indicate means ± SD. n.s. P >0.05, *P <0.05, **P <0.01, ***P<0.001 represent significance of difference, P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Significant was calculated by ANOVA followed by turkey's test. n indicates the replicates of experiment.
Figure 4Evaluation of HCD induced larval zebrafish models by bezafibrate and pioglitazone treatments. (A) Experimental outline of NAFLD larval zebrafish with BZT and PIO administration groups. (B) Survival rate of larval zebrafish (n=3). (C) weight changes of larval zebrafish (D) Width changes of larval zebrafish. (E)TC level of larval zebrafish (n=6). (F) TG level of larval zebrafish (n=6). Bar indicate means ± SD. n.s.P >0.05, *P <0.05, **P <0.01, ***P<0.001 represent significance of difference, P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Significant was calculated by ANOVA followed by turkey's test. n indicates the replicates of experiment.
Specific sequences of primers used in RT-qPCR
| Gene name | Accession number (Danio rerio) | Forward primer (5'->3') | Reverse primer (5'->3') | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equivalently homo sapiens | ||||
| SREBP1 | NM_001105129 | CATCCACATGGCTCTGAGTG | CTCATCCACAAAGAAGCGGT | |
| FAS | XM_005169478 | ATCTGTTCCTGTTCGATGGC | AGCATATCTCGGCTGACGTT | |
| PPARα | NM_001102567 | CGTCGTCAGGTGTTTACGGT | AGGCACTTCTGGAATCGACA | |
| CPT1 | NM_001044854.1 | ACTCTCGATGGACCCTGTGA | CTGGATGAAGGCATCTGGAC | |
| PPARγ | NM_131467 | CTGCCGCATACACAAGAAGA | TCACGTCACTGGAGAACTCG | |
| TNFα | NM_212859 | GCTTATGAGCCATGCAGTGA | TGCCCAGTCTGTCTCCTTCT | |
| IL1β | NM_212844 | TGGCGAACGTCATCCAAG | GGAGCACTGGGCGACGCATA | |
| IL6 | NM_001261449 | AGACCGCTGCCTGTCTAAAA | TTTGATGTCGTTCACCAGGA | |
| MMP9 | NM213123.1 | GAAGCGTTACGGCTACGT | TTCCATGTCTGGCGAATAG | |
| TGFβ | NM_182873.1 | CATAAGAGCCACAGACAGAAG | GTAGAGCGAGCGTAAACAG | |
| Keap1 | NM_182864.2 | CCAACGGCATAGAGGTAGTTAT | CCTGTATGTGGTAGGAGGGTT | |
| Nrf2 | NM_182889.1 | TTGTCTTTGGTGAACGGAGGT | CTCGGAGGAGATGGAAGGAAG | |
The specific sequences of primers used in this study are shown in the table. The Danio rerio primers were used on larval zebrafish. The equivalently Homo sapiens primers were listed for reference.
Figure 2Effect of high cholesterol diet on metabolic oxidant stress in larval zebrafish. (A) ROS production of Larval zebrafish stained by DCFH-DA and captured by fluorescence stereoscope (B) Quantitation of ROS level (n=6). (C) MDA level of larval zebrafish (n=6) (D) SOD activity of larval zebrafish (n=6). Bar indicate means ± SD. ***P<0.001 represent significance of difference, P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Significant was calculated by ANOVA followed by turkey's test. n indicates the replicates of experiment.
Figure 3Effect of high cholesterol diet on hepatic steatosis in larval zebrafish. (A)Oil red O staining of larval zebrafish, the hepatic steatosis was point out with yellow circle. (B) HE staining of larval zebrafish liver, macrovesicular steatosis, possible fibrosis feature and ballooning degeneration were point out with red arrows. (C) Macrovesicular steatosis area percentage of larval zebrafish liver (evaluated by 6 experts).
Figure 5Further evaluation of HCD induced 2 weeks larval zebrafish model by bezafibrate and pioglitazone treatments. (A) Nile red stain and ROS production of Larval zebrafish. (B) Oxidant stress index of ROS, MDA, and SOD of larval zebrafish (n=6). (C) Oil red O staining of larval zebrafish, the hepatic steatosis was point out with yellow circle. (D) HE staining of larval zebrafish liver, macrovesicular steatosis, and microvesicular steatosis were point out with red arrows. (E) Macrovesicular steatosis area percentage of larval zebrafish liver (evaluated by 6 experts). (F)mRNA expression of lipogenesis and lipid-lowering of larval zebrafish (n=6). (G) mRNA expression of inflammation, Fibrosis and oxidant stress of larval zebrafish (n=6). Bar indicate means ± SD. n.s.P >0.05, ***P<0.001 represent significance of difference, P<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Significant was calculated by ANOVA followed by turkey's test. n indicates the replicates of experiment.
Figure 6Spectrum of NAFLD on HCD induced larval zebrafish. (A) Processing of NAFLD on Larval zebrafish. (B) Multiple aspects changes in processing of NAFLD on Larval zebrafish.