| Literature DB >> 31182122 |
Maria Helena Guerra Andersen1,2, Marie Frederiksen3, Anne Thoustrup Saber3, Regitze Sølling Wils4,3, Ana Sofia Fonseca3, Ismo K Koponen3, Sandra Johannesson5, Martin Roursgaard4, Steffen Loft4, Peter Møller4, Ulla Vogel3,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Short-term controlled exposure to diesel exhaust (DE) in chamber studies have shown mixed results on lung and systemic effects. There is a paucity of studies on well-characterized real-life DE exposure in humans. In the present study, 29 healthy volunteers were exposed to DE while sitting as passengers in diesel-powered trains. Exposure in electric trains was used as control scenario. Each train scenario consisted of three consecutive days (6 h/day) ending with biomarker samplings.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular function; Comet assay; DNA damage; Diesel exhaust; Lung function; Train exposure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31182122 PMCID: PMC6558821 DOI: 10.1186/s12989-019-0306-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol ISSN: 1743-8977 Impact factor: 9.400
Black carbon, ultrafine particles and nitrogen oxides concentrations and contrast between diesel and electric trains
| Exposure | Electric ( | Diesel ( | Mean difference (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Black carbon (μg/m3) | 1.8 (0.5) | 10.3 (2.0) | 8.5 (7.9; 9.1)*** |
| Ultrafine particles from DiscMini (#/cm3) a) | 8100 (2400) | 189,200 (91,900) | 181,000 (153,700; 208,400)*** |
| Ultrafine particles from NanoTracer (#/cm3) | 9100 (3500) | 133,400 (52,100) | 124,300 (110,000; 138,500)*** |
| NOx (μg/m3) | 45 (16) | 363 (73) | 317 (297; 338)*** |
| NO2 (μg/m3) | 18 (9) | 54 (16) | 36 (31; 42)*** |
The exposure was assigned to study participants (study participants rode the trains in groups of different sizes. The exposure average levels for each calendar day were assigned to all members of the relevant group). Exposure levels in both scenarios are presented as mean and standard deviation. PM2.5, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and aldehydes are not assigned to study participants, as the data were not collected throughout all the study period. a) missing values for DiscMini equipment indexed to four study persons for the exposure scenarios (n = 46 diesel and n = 25 for electric). ***p < 0.001
Fig. 1Correlation between air pollution components in diesel and electric trains. The data corresponds to 63 (UFP and black carbon measured with NanoTracer equipment and Aethalometer, respectively) and 55 (UFP measured with DiscMini equipment) days of exposure. Nitrogen oxides were measured over 3 days, corresponding to 18 periods
Outcome levels for electric and diesel scenarios and percent changes in biomarker levels
| Biomarker | Electric (mean ± SD) | Diesel (mean ± SD) | % Change (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urinary excretion | 1-OHP (μmol/mol creatinine) | 0.049 ± 0.083 | 0.027 ± 0.019 | −12.2 (− 32.3; 14.0) | 0.331 |
| 2-OHF (μmol/mol creatinine) | 0.075 ± 0.067 | 0.070 ± 0.061 | 0.6 (− 17.3; 22.4) | 0.952 | |
| 1-NAPH (μmol/mol creatinine) | 0.851 ± 0.603 | 0.671 ± 0.560 | −20.0 (−44.3; 4.3) | 0.107 | |
| 2-NAPH (μmol/mol creatinine) | 2.084 ± 2.272 | 1.861 ± 1.679 | −0.4 (−20.7; 25.2) | 0.975 | |
| Lung function | FVC (L) | 4.20 ± 1.24 | 4.18 ± 1.16 | −2.3 (−4.7; 0.25) | 0.077 |
| FEV1 (L) | 3.32 ± 0.96 | 3.24 ± 0.96 | −3.6 (−5.5; −1.6) | 0.0003*** | |
| FEV1/FVC (%) | 79.1 ± 6.8 | 77.2 ± 9.2 | −1.8 (− 3.8; 0.2) | 0.073 | |
| PEF (L/s) | 7.26 ± 2.13 | 7.15 ± 2.42 | −5.6 (− 10.7; − 0.5) | 0.031* | |
| Cardiovascular function | Ln.RHI | 0.57 ± 0.25 | 0.55 ± 0.28 | −1.4 (− 26.5; 23.7) | 0.913 |
| NIV | 2.26 ± 1.06 | 2.21 ± 0.71 | − 3.7 (− 34.6; 27.3) | 0.817 | |
| pNN50 (%) | 0.06 ± 0.08 | 6.54 ± 0.07 | 4.6 (− 13.8; 23.0) | 0.626 | |
| RMSSD (ms) | 41.84 ± 30.93 | 36.39 ± 19.02 | − 3.5 (− 22.1; 19.7) | 0.326 | |
| SDNN (ms) | 48.16 ± 24.29 | 44.24 ± 16.76 | −2.1 (− 14.9; 12.7) | 0.773 | |
| LF (ms2) | 160.2 ± 59.5 | 195.9 ± 78.8 | 16.5 (5.9; 27.0) | 0.002** | |
| HF (ms2) | 153.6 ± 57.6 | 151.8 ± 67.5 | 2.0 (− 7.5; 11.5) | 0.681 | |
| LF/HF | 1.27 ± 0.83 | 1.70 ± 1.37 | 18.5 (−5.5; 48.6) | 0.141 | |
| AI normalized to heart rate of 75 bpm (%) | −8.26 ± 11.79 | −6.26 ± 14.68 | 1.6 (−2.2; 5.5) | 0.405 | |
| DP (mm Hg) | 81.2 ± 11.4 | 82.3 ± 10.8 | 1.2 (−2.9; 5.2) | 0.566 | |
| SP (mm Hg) | 135.1 ± 16.1 | 134.4 ± 17.9 | −1.0 (−4.9; 2.9) | 0.630 | |
| DNA damage | SB (lesions/106 bp) | 0.12 ± 0.13 | 0.18 ± 0.13 | 46.3 (5.0; 100.9) | 0.025* |
| Fpg-sensitive sites (lesions/106 bp) | 0.62 ± 0.15 | 0.58 ± 0.12 | −5.0 (−11.1; 1.1) | 0.109 | |
| Adhesion molecules | ICAM-1 (ng/mL) | 35.04 ± 7.28 | 34.34 ± 6.88 | −2.5 (−8.3; 3.7) | 0.426 |
| VCAM-1 (ng/mL) | 134.2 ± 36.2 | 129.6 ± 35.8 | −3.2 (−10.5; 4.7) | 0.416 | |
| Acute phase proteins | SAA (mg/L) | 32.09 ± 41.51 | 36.46 ± 47.35 | 11.1 (−17.8; 50.2) | 0.493 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 1.83 ± 2.29 | 1.90 ± 2.48 | −12.3 (−47.5; 46.4) | 0.615 | |
Percent change was estimated by mixed-effects model adjusted for age and sex, comparing diesel with electric scenarios
CI confidence interval, SD standard deviation, 1-OHP 1-hydroxypyrene, 2-OHF 2-hydroxyfluorene, 1-NAPH 1-naphthol, 2-NAPH 2-naphthol, FVC forced vital capacity, FEV1 forced expiratory volume in one second, PEF peak expiratory flow rate, Ln.RHI reactive hyperemia index with natural logarithmic transformation (the percent change was back transformed), NIV nitroglycerin-induced vasodilation, pNN50 proportion of successive NN intervals differing by more than 50 milliseconds divided by total number of NN intervals, RMSSD square root of the mean squared differences of successive NN intervals, SDNN standard deviation of all NN intervals, LF low frequency component (0.04–0.15 Hz), HF high frequency component (0.15–0.4 Hz), AI augmentation index, DP diastolic blood pressure, SP systolic blood pressure, SB DNA strand breaks, ICAM-1 intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1, VCAM-1 vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, SAA serum amyloid A, CRP C-reactive protein; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001
Fig. 2Lung function parameters after exposure in electric and diesel trains. The circles in grey represent individual lung function parameters for electric train (one exposure scenario) or diesel train (mean of two exposure scenarios). The dark line represents the mixed-effects model without adjustments. Lower levels of FEV1 and PEF were observed on group level (solid symbols) after exposure in diesel trains (p < 0.05)
Fig. 3Low frequency (LF) component of heart rate variability measured after exposure in electric and diesel trains. The circles in grey represent LF measurements in electric train (one exposure scenario) or diesel train (mean of two exposure scenarios). The dark line represents the mixed-effects model without adjustments. Higher LF levels were observed on group level (solid symbols) after exposure in diesel trains (p < 0.05)
Fig. 4DNA strand breaks in peripheral blood mononuclear cells after exposure in electric and diesel trains. The circles in grey represent DNA strand breaks in electric train (one exposure scenario) or diesel train (mean of two exposure scenarios). The dark line represents the mixed-effects model without adjustments. Higher levels of DNA strand breaks were observed on group level (solid symbols) after exposure in diesel trains (p < 0.05)
Association between exposure levels and biomarkers estimated by mixed-effects model adjusted for age and sex
Exposure levels are averages of 3 days
UFP ultrafine particles, BC black carbon, FVC forced vital capacity, FEV1 forced expiratory volume in one second, PEF peak expiratory flow rate, LF low frequency component, DNA SB DNA strand breaks
, , , p ≤ 0.08; < 0.05; < 0.01; < 0.001, respectively
Estimates for associations between daily averages of exposure levels and biomarkers (91% CI)
| Exposure markers | FVC (L) | FEV1 (L) | FEV1/FVC | PEF (L/s) | LF (ms2) | DNA SB (lesions/106 bp)a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UFP (NanoTracer) (#/cm3) | ||||||
| Day 1 | −0.7E−06 (−1.4E−06; −0.04E-06)* | -0.7E-06 (− 1.2E-06; − 0.2E-06)** | -0.6E-05 (− 1.7E-05; 0.5E-05) | −2.2E− 06 (−4.3E− 06; − 0.08E− 06)* | 2.2E-04 (0.5E-04; 3.9E-04)* | 4.1E-06 (1.3E-06; 6.9E-06)** |
| Day 2 | -0.6E-06 (− 1.1E-06; − 0.02E-06)* | -0.6E-06 (−0.9E-06; − 0.2E-06)** | -0.8E-05 (−1.7E-05; 0.04E-05) | − 1.1E− 06 (− 2.7E− 06; 0.6E-06) | 1.3E-04 (0.03E-04; 2.6E-04)* | 4.9E-06 (2.8E-06; 7.0E-06)*** |
| Day 3, sampling day | -0.7E-06 (− 1.4E-06; 0.05E-06) | -0.8E-06 (− 1.3E-06; − 0.3E-06)** | −1.0E-05 (− 2.2E-05; 0.1E-05) | −3.1E− 06 (−5.2E-06; − 0.9E-06)** | 2.8E-04 (1.2E-04; 4.3E-04)*** | 3.9E-06 (0.7E-06; 6.9E-06)* |
| UFP (DiscMini) (#/cm3) | ||||||
| Day 1 | -0.6E-06 (− 1.2E-06; 0.01E-06) | −5.2E− 07 (− 9.2E-07;- 1.2E-07)* | -0.5E-05 (− 1.5E-05; 0.5E-05) | −1.9E− 06 (− 3.7E-06; − 0.1E-06)* | 1.7E-04 (0.3E-04; 2.9E-04)* | 3.9E-06 (1.6E-06; 6.1E-06)*** |
| Day 2 | -0.4E-06 (−0.8E-06; 0.06E-06) | −3.2E− 07 (− 5.5E-07; − 0.9E-07)** | -0.4E-05 (− 0.9E-05; 0.2E-05) | −1.2E− 06 (− 2.6E-06; 0.1E-06) | 1.4E-04 (0.5E-04; 2.3E-04)** | 2.7E-06 (1.0E-06; 4.4E-06)** |
| Day 3, sampling day | -0.5E-06 (− 1.0E-06; 0.02E-06) | −5.2E− 07 (− 8.6E-07; − 1.8E-07)** | -0.8E-05 (− 1.6E-05; 0.06E-05) | − 2.3E-06 (− 3.8E-06; − 0.8E-06)** | 1.5E-04 (0.4E-04; 2.5E-04)** | 2.6E-06 (0.6E-06; 4.7E-06)* |
| BC (μg/m3) | ||||||
| Day 1 | −1.5E-02 (−2.8E-02; − 0.3E-02)* | −1.4E-02 (− 2.2E-02; − 0.5E-02)** | −1.2E-01 (− 3.3E-01; 0.9E-01) | −5.4E-02 (− 9.1E-02; − 1.7E-02)** | 4.5 (1.8; 7.2)** | 4.3E-02 (− 1.2E-02; 9.8E-02) |
| Day 2 | −1.2E-02 (− 2.2E-02; − 0.1E-02)* | −1.3E-02 (− 1.9E-02; − 0.5E-02)*** | −1.6E-01 (− 3.3E-01; 0.1E-01) | −3.1E− 02 (− 6.3E-02; 0.2E-02) | 3.1 (0.7; 5.6)* | 6.6E-02 (2.0E-02; 11.2E-02)** |
| Day 3, sampling day | -0.8E-02 (− 1.8E-02; 0.2E-02) | −1.1E-02 (− 1.8E-02; − 0.4E-02)** | −1.8E-01 (− 3.4E-01; − 0.2E-01)* | −3.0E-02 (− 6.0E-02; 0.06E-02) | 3.4 (1.3; 5.5)** | 6.6E-02 (2.3E-02; 10.9E-02)** |
Estimated by mixed-effects model adjusted for age and sex. The values in the table are the beta-estimates of the linear associations (linear mixed model for each day and pollutant)
UFP, ultrafine particles; BC, black carbon; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in one second; PEF, peak expiratory flow rate; LF, low frequency component; DNA SB, DNA strand breaks. The exposure data were collected during 3 days and biomarkers data assessed from sampling in the 3rd day of exposure. Day 1 corresponds to the first day in the trains, two days before sampling; day 2 corresponds to the second day in the trains, one day before sampling; and day 3 to the third day in the trains and the sampling day
aSB was transformed with cubic root
*,**,***, p < 0.05; < 0.01; < 0.001, respectively
Characteristics of the study participants at the control measurements (mean (±SD))
| Characteristics | Females ( | Males ( | Total ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 34.7 (±14.7) | 43.4 (±17.6) | 38.9 (±16.5) |
| Height (cm) | 166.6 (±4.7) | 181.4 (±10.1) | 173.7 (±10.7) |
| Weight (kg) | 71.5 (±17.5) | 81.4 (±16.5) | 76.3 (±17.4) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.6 (±5.3) | 24.7 (±3.8) | 25.2 (±4.6) |
| FVC (%) | 92.7 (±15.6) | 91.2 (±21.5) | 92.0 (±18.2) |
| FEV1 (%) | 89.4 (±16.6) | 89.4 (±19.2) | 89.4 (±17.5) |
| FEV1/FVC (%) | 96.3 (±7.6) | 98.0 (±6.5) | 97.1 (±7.0) |
| PEF (%) | 87.3 (±20.4) | 85.4 (±18.2) | 86.4 (±19.1) |
SD standard deviation, BMI body mass index, FVC forced vital capacity, FEV1 forced expiratory volume in one second, PEF peak expiratory flow rate. The lung function parameters are presented as the percentage of the predicted value from the general population in the NHANES III survey