Literature DB >> 31180600

Etiology and perinatal outcome of periviable fetal growth restriction associated with structural or genetic anomaly.

A Dall'Asta1,2,3, S Girardelli1,4, S Usman1, A Lawin-O'Brien1, G Paramasivam1, T Frusca3, C C Lees1,2,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the etiology and perinatal outcome of periviable fetal growth restriction (FGR) associated with a structural defect or genetic anomaly.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of singleton pregnancies seen at a referral fetal medicine unit between 2005 and 2018, in which FGR (defined as fetal abdominal circumference ≤ 3rd percentile for gestational age) was diagnosed between 22 + 0 and 25 + 6 weeks of gestation. The study group included pregnancies with periviable FGR associated with a genetic or structural anomaly (anomalous FGR), while the control group consisted of structurally and genetically normal pregnancies with periviable FGR (non-anomalous FGR). Results of genetic testing, TORCH screen and postmortem examination, as well as perinatal outcome, were investigated.
RESULTS: Of 255 pregnancies complicated by periviable FGR, 188 were eligible; of which 52 (28%) had anomalous FGR and 136 (72%) had non-anomalous FGR. A confirmed genetic abnormality accounted for 17/52 cases (33%) of anomalous FGR, with trisomy 18 constituting over 50% (9/17; 53%). The most common structural defects associated with FGR were central nervous system abnormalities (13/35; 37%). Overall, 12 (23%) cases of anomalous FGR survived the neonatal period. No differences were found in terms of perinatal survival between pregnancies with anomalous and those with non-anomalous FGR.
CONCLUSIONS: Most pregnancies complicated by anomalous FGR were associated with a structural defect. The presence of an associated genetic defect was invariably lethal, while those with a structural defect, in the absence of a confirmed genetic abnormality, survived into infancy in over 90% of cases, with an overall one in three chance of perinatal survival. These data can be used for counseling prospective parents.
Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abnormal fetal growth; amniocentesis; aneuploidy; fetal anatomy; preterm delivery

Year:  2020        PMID: 31180600     DOI: 10.1002/uog.20368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  2 in total

1.  Ultrasound prediction of adverse perinatal outcome at diagnosis of late-onset fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  A Dall'Asta; T Stampalija; F Mecacci; M Minopoli; G B L Schera; G Cagninelli; C Ottaviani; I Fantasia; M Barbieri; F Lisi; S Simeone; T Ghi; T Frusca
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 8.678

2.  Infant outcome after active management of early-onset fetal growth restriction with absent or reversed umbilical artery blood flow.

Authors:  E Morsing; J Brodszki; A Thuring; K Maršál
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 7.299

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.