Literature DB >> 31179117

Nomogram to predict postoperative PR in patients undergoing CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy.

Saibin Wang1, Junwei Tu1, Ke Dong2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pleural reaction (PR) frequently occurs following computed tomography-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (CT-TNB). The purpose of this study was to establish a predictive model for PR following CT-TNB.
METHODS: In this study, a total of 436 patients who underwent CT-TNB between June 2016 and December 2017 at a tertiary hospital were consecutively included. Patient demographics, lesion features, laboratory tests, and biopsy parameters were collected. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to establish a prediction model for post-CT-TNB PR, presented by a nomogram. Discrimination and calibration were assessed. For internal validation, a bootstrap resampling method was applied, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to evaluate its clinical utility.
RESULTS: PR occurred in 7.8% (34/436) of patients. Four non-zero coefficient variables (gender, age, lesion location, and puncture position) were filtered by LASSO regression analysis and were used to establish a predictive model. The area under the curve in the derivation and validation was 0.840 (95% CI, 0.767-0.913) and 0.841 (95% CI, 0.769-0.912), respectively. The model was well-calibrated (P>0.05), and DCA indicated clinical efficacy.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we established a nomogram, including as parameters gender, age, lesion location, and puncture position, which may have great significance for individualized prediction of post-CT-TNB PR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pulmonary; biopsy; nomogram; pleural reaction

Year:  2019        PMID: 31179117      PMCID: PMC6531760          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.01.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  23 in total

Review 1.  Special techniques in transthoracic needle biopsy of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  D F Yankelevitz; M Vazquez; C I Henschke
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.303

2.  Management of pneumothorax after percutaneous CT-guided lung biopsy.

Authors:  Takuji Yamagami; Toshiyuki Nakamura; Shigeharu Iida; Takeharu Kato; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy.

Authors:  A Manhire; M Charig; C Clelland; F Gleeson; R Miller; H Moss; K Pointon; C Richardson; E Sawicka
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  Factors influencing pneumothorax rate at lung biopsy: are dwell time and angle of pleural puncture contributing factors?

Authors:  J P Ko; J O Shepard; E A Drucker; S L Aquino; A Sharma; B Sabloff; E Halpern; T C McLoud
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  CT-guided needle biopsy of lung lesions: a survey of severe complication based on 9783 biopsies in Japan.

Authors:  Noriyuki Tomiyama; Yoshifumi Yasuhara; Yasuo Nakajima; Shuji Adachi; Yasuaki Arai; Masahiko Kusumoto; Kenji Eguchi; Keiko Kuriyama; Fumikazu Sakai; Masayuki Noguchi; Kiyoshi Murata; Sadayuki Murayama; Teruhito Mochizuki; Kiyoshi Mori; Kozo Yamada
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Timothy R Church; William C Black; Denise R Aberle; Christine D Berg; Kathy L Clingan; Fenghai Duan; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; David S Gierada; Gordon C Jones; Irene Mahon; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks; Amanda Jain; Sarah Baum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Risk assessment of pneumothorax and pulmonary haemorrhage complicating percutaneous co-axial cutting needle lung biopsy.

Authors:  Biswajit Chakrabarti; John E Earis; Rakesh Pandey; Yvonne Jones; Kirsty Slaven; Suzanne Amin; Caroline McCann; Phillip L Jones; Erica Thwaite; John M Curtis; Christopher J Warburton
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.415

9.  Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Angel M Cronin; Elena B Elkin; Mithat Gonen
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  3 in total

1.  Development and validation of a web-based prediction tool on minor physical anomalies for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Xin-Yu Wang; Jin-Jia Lin; Ming-Kun Lu; Fong-Lin Jang; Huai-Hsuan Tseng; Po-See Chen; Po-Fan Chen; Wei-Hung Chang; Chih-Chun Huang; Ke-Ming Lu; Hung-Pin Tan; Sheng-Hsiang Lin
Journal:  Schizophrenia (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-02-24

2.  Development of a hemoptysis risk prediction model for patients following CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy.

Authors:  Saibin Wang; Ke Dong; Wei Chen
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.317

3.  Prediction model of emergency mortality risk in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Lan Chen; Han Zheng; Saibin Wang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.