Literature DB >> 3117864

Evaluation of the addition of cromolyn sodium to bronchodilator maintenance therapy in the long-term management of asthma.

H Eigen1, J J Reid, R Dahl, C Del Bufalo, L Fasano, G Gunella, K K Sahlstrom, K L Alanko, J Greenbaum, C H Hagelund.   

Abstract

Three hundred ninety-seven patients, aged 5 to 63 years, took part in a year-long international multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The patients, whose asthma was considered not adequately controlled, were divided into two groups according to their principal medication at entry (group A, oral and/or inhaled beta 2-bronchodilators; group B, methylxanthines, with or without beta 2-agonists) and randomly allocated to additional treatment with cromolyn sodium (metered-dose inhaler, 2 mg, four times a day, or capsules, 20 mg, four times a day) or matching placebo. A 2-month baseline preceded 10 to 12 months of treatment. After 4 to 8 weeks of treatment, patients were encouraged to reduce bronchodilator usage. Patients used diary cards to record asthma severity, sleep difficulty, morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates, days of disruption of normal activity, use of test treatments, and concomitant medication. Significant differences favoring cromolyn sodium (p less than 0.05 and better) were observed for most of the treatment period in respect to (1) asthma severity, (2) morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates, and (3) days of disruption of normal activity. Patients receiving cromolyn sodium experienced fewer exacerbations and tended to use less concomitant medication than patients receiving placebo. Patients' opinions of treatment significantly favored cromolyn sodium. These results demonstrate the value of the addition of cromolyn sodium to existing therapy in the long-term management of asthma and endorse its use as a first-line treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3117864     DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(87)90016-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  7 in total

Review 1.  The cost of asthma: can it be reduced?

Authors:  C M Mellis; J K Peat; A J Woolcock
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Economic evaluation of treatments for respiratory disease.

Authors:  S Bryan; M J Buxton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Auranofin in the treatment of steroid dependent asthma: a double blind study.

Authors:  G Nierop; W P Gijzel; E H Bel; A H Zwinderman; J H Dijkman
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  Treatment of childhood asthma: how do the available options compare?

Authors:  David Coghlan; Colin Powell
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  Efficacy of cromoglycate in persistently wheezing infants.

Authors:  S Furfaro; S Spier; S P Drblik; J P Turgeon; M Robert
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Genetic deficiency and pharmacological stabilization of mast cells reduce diet-induced obesity and diabetes in mice.

Authors:  Jian Liu; Adeline Divoux; Jiusong Sun; Jie Zhang; Karine Clément; Jonathan N Glickman; Galina K Sukhova; Paul J Wolters; Juan Du; Cem Z Gorgun; Alessandro Doria; Peter Libby; Richard S Blumberg; Barbara B Kahn; Gökhan S Hotamisligil; Guo-Ping Shi
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2009-07-26       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Development and psychometric assessment of the COPD and Asthma Sleep Impact Scale (CASIS).

Authors:  Robin F Pokrzywinski; David M Meads; Stephen P McKenna; G Alistair Glendenning; Dennis A Revicki
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 3.186

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.