Xavier Pivot1, Gilles Romieu2, Marc Debled3, Jean-Yves Pierga4, Pierre Kerbrat5, Thomas Bachelot6, Alain Lortholary7, Marc Espié8, Pierre Fumoleau9, Daniel Serin10, Jean-Philippe Jacquin11, Christelle Jouannaud12, Maria Rios13, Sophie Abadie-Lacourtoisie14, Laurence Venat-Bouvet15, Laurent Cany16, Stéphanie Catala17, David Khayat18, Laetitia Gambotti19, Iris Pauporté20, Celine Faure-Mercier19, Sophie Paget-Bailly21, Julie Henriques21, Jean Marie Grouin22. 1. Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France. Electronic address: xpivot@strasbourg.unicancer.fr. 2. Centre Val d'Aurelle, Montpellier, France. 3. Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France. 4. Institut Curie, University Paris Descartes, Paris, France. 5. Centre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France. 6. Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. 7. Centre Catherine de Sienne, Nantes, France. 8. University Hospital Saint-Louis, Paris, France. 9. Institut Curie, Paris, France. 10. Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France. 11. Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France. 12. Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France. 13. Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France. 14. Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Angers, France. 15. University Hospital, Limoges, France. 16. Clinique Francheville, Périgueux, France. 17. Clinique Saint-Pierre, Perpignan, France. 18. Clinique Bizet, Paris, France. 19. French National Cancer Institute, Boulogne, France. 20. Ligue contre le cancer-France, Paris, France. 21. University Hospital, Besançon, France. 22. Department of Statistics, University of Rouen, Rouen, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2013, the interim analysis of the Protocol for Herceptin as Adjuvant therapy with Reduced Exposure (PHARE) trial could not show that 6 months of adjuvant trastuzumab was non-inferior to 12 months. Here, we report the planned final analysis based on the prespecified number of occurring events. METHODS:PHARE is an open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority randomised trial of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer comparing 6 months versus 12 months of trastuzumab treatment concomitant with or following standard neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The study was undertaken in 156 centres in France. Eligible patients were women aged 18 years or older with non-metastatic, operable, histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast and either positive axillary nodes or negative axillary nodes but a tumour of at least 10 mm. Participants must have received at least four cycles of a chemotherapy for this breast cancer and have started receiving adjuvant trastuzumab-treatment. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to either 6 months or 12 months of trastuzumab therapy duration between the third and sixth months of adjuvant trastuzumab. The randomisation was stratified by concomitant or sequential treatment with chemotherapy, oestrogen receptor status, and centre. The primary objective was non-inferiority in the intention-to-treat population in the 6-month group in terms of disease-free survival with a prespecified hazard margin of 1·15. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00381901. FINDINGS:3384 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either 12 months (n=1691) or 6 months (n=1693) of adjuvant trastuzumab. One patient in the 12-month group and three patients in the 6-month group were excluded, so 1690 patients in each group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At a median follow-up of 7·5 years (IQR 5·3-8·8), 704 events relevant to disease-free survival were observed (345 [20·4%] in the 12-month group and 359 [21·2%] in the 6-month group). The adjusted hazard ratio for disease-free survival in the 12-month group versus the 6-month group was 1·08 (95% CI 0·93-1·25; p=0·39). The non-inferiority margin was included in the 95% CI. No differences in effects pertaining to trastuzumab duration were found in any of the subgroups. After the completion of trastuzumab treatment, rare adverse events occurred over time and the safety analysis remained similar to the previously published report. In particular, we found no change in the cardiac safety comparison, and only three additional cases in which the left ventricular ejection fraction decreased to less than 50% have been reported in the 12-month group. INTERPRETATION: The PHARE study did not show the non-inferiority of 6 months versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab. Hence, adjuvant trastuzumab standard duration should remain 12 months. FUNDING: The French National Cancer Institute.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In 2013, the interim analysis of the Protocol for Herceptin as Adjuvant therapy with Reduced Exposure (PHARE) trial could not show that 6 months of adjuvant trastuzumab was non-inferior to 12 months. Here, we report the planned final analysis based on the prespecified number of occurring events. METHODS: PHARE is an open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority randomised trial of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer comparing 6 months versus 12 months of trastuzumab treatment concomitant with or following standard neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. The study was undertaken in 156 centres in France. Eligible patients were women aged 18 years or older with non-metastatic, operable, histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the breast and either positive axillary nodes or negative axillary nodes but a tumour of at least 10 mm. Participants must have received at least four cycles of a chemotherapy for this breast cancer and have started receiving adjuvant trastuzumab-treatment. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to either 6 months or 12 months of trastuzumab therapy duration between the third and sixth months of adjuvant trastuzumab. The randomisation was stratified by concomitant or sequential treatment with chemotherapy, oestrogen receptor status, and centre. The primary objective was non-inferiority in the intention-to-treat population in the 6-month group in terms of disease-free survival with a prespecified hazard margin of 1·15. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00381901. FINDINGS: 3384 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to either 12 months (n=1691) or 6 months (n=1693) of adjuvant trastuzumab. One patient in the 12-month group and three patients in the 6-month group were excluded, so 1690 patients in each group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At a median follow-up of 7·5 years (IQR 5·3-8·8), 704 events relevant to disease-free survival were observed (345 [20·4%] in the 12-month group and 359 [21·2%] in the 6-month group). The adjusted hazard ratio for disease-free survival in the 12-month group versus the 6-month group was 1·08 (95% CI 0·93-1·25; p=0·39). The non-inferiority margin was included in the 95% CI. No differences in effects pertaining to trastuzumab duration were found in any of the subgroups. After the completion of trastuzumab treatment, rare adverse events occurred over time and the safety analysis remained similar to the previously published report. In particular, we found no change in the cardiac safety comparison, and only three additional cases in which the left ventricular ejection fraction decreased to less than 50% have been reported in the 12-month group. INTERPRETATION: The PHARE study did not show the non-inferiority of 6 months versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab. Hence, adjuvant trastuzumab standard duration should remain 12 months. FUNDING: The French National Cancer Institute.
Authors: Jennifer Y Sheng; Cesar A Santa-Maria; Neha Mangini; Haval Norman; Rima Couzi; Raquel Nunes; Mary Wilkinson; Kala Visvanathan; Roisin M Connolly; Evanthia T Roussos Torres; John H Fetting; Deborah K Armstrong; Jessica J Tao; Lisa Jacobs; Jean L Wright; Elissa D Thorner; Christine Hodgdon; Samantha Horn; Antonio C Wolff; Vered Stearns; Karen L Smith Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2020-06-30
Authors: Helena Earl; Louise Hiller; Anne-Laure Vallier; Shrushma Loi; Karen McAdam; Luke Hughes-Davies; Daniel Rea; Donna Howe; Kerry Raynes; Helen B Higgins; Maggie Wilcox; Chris Plummer; Betania Mahler-Araujo; Elena Provenzano; Anita Chhabra; Sophie Gasson; Claire Balmer; Jean E Abraham; Carlos Caldas; Peter Hall; Bethany Shinkins; Christopher McCabe; Claire Hulme; David Miles; Andrew M Wardley; David A Cameron; Janet A Dunn Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Aleix Prat; Valentina Guarneri; Laia Paré; Gaia Griguolo; Tomás Pascual; Maria V Dieci; Núria Chic; Blanca González-Farré; Antonio Frassoldati; Esther Sanfeliu; Juan M Cejalvo; Montserrat Muñoz; Giancarlo Bisagni; Fara Brasó-Maristany; Loredana Urso; Maria Vidal; Alba A Brandes; Barbara Adamo; Antonino Musolino; Federica Miglietta; Benedetta Conte; Mafalda Oliveira; Cristina Saura; Sònia Pernas; Jesús Alarcón; Antonio Llombart-Cussac; Javier Cortés; Luis Manso; Rafael López; Eva Ciruelos; Francesco Schettini; Patricia Villagrasa; Lisa A Carey; Charles M Perou; Federico Piacentini; Roberto D'Amico; Enrico Tagliafico; Joel S Parker; Pierfranco Conte Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-11 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Evandro de Azambuja; Noam Ponde; Marion Procter; Priya Rastogi; Reena S Cecchini; Matteo Lambertini; Karla Ballman; Alvaro Moreno Aspitia; Dimitrios Zardavas; Lise Roca; Richard D Gelber; Martine Piccart-Gebhart; Thomas Suter Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 4.872