| Literature DB >> 31175317 |
Mariana Sponchiado1,2, Angela M Gonella-Diaza1,3, Cecília C Rocha1, Edson G Lo Turco4, Guilherme Pugliesi1, Jo L M R Leroy2, Mario Binelli5,6.
Abstract
In cattle, conceptus development after elongation relies on well-characterized, paracrine interactions with the hosting maternal reproductive tract. However, it was unrecognized previously that the pre-hatching, pre-implantation bovine embryo also engages in biochemical signalling with the maternal uterus. Our recent work showed that the embryo modified the endometrial transcriptome in vivo. Here, we hypothesized that the embryo modulates the biochemical composition of the uterine luminal fluid (ULF) in the most cranial portion of the uterine horn ipsilateral to the corpus luteum. Endometrial samples and ULF were collected post-mortem from sham-inseminated cows and from cows inseminated and detected pregnant 7 days after oestrus. We used quantitative mass spectrometry to demonstrate that the pre-hatching embryo changes ULF composition in vivo. Embryo-induced modulation included an increase in concentrations of lipoxygenase-derived metabolites [12(S)-HETE, 15(S)-HETE] and a decrease in the concentrations of amino acids (glycine), biogenic amines (sarcosine), acylcarnitines and phospholipids. The changed composition of the ULF could be due to secretion or depletion of specific molecules, executed by either the embryo or the endometrium, but initiated by signals coming from the embryo. This study provides the basis for further understanding embryo-initiated modulation of the uterine milieu. Early embryonic signalling may be necessary to guarantee optimal development and successful establishment of pregnancy in cattle.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31175317 PMCID: PMC6555789 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44590-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Diagram of sample collection procedure. (A) After slaughter, reproductive tracts were trimmed free of connective tissues; (B) The uterine horn ipsilateral to the corpus luteum was isolated. Starting from the utero-tubal junction (UTJ), locking tweezers were positioned every 8 cm to isolate the anterior, medial and posterior uterine thirds. (C) The ipsilateral anterior third was individually flushed by injecting 3 mL of PBS into the UTJ edge. (D) Intercaruncular endometrial samples were dissected from the UTJ (black arrow) and from the lengthwise intermediate region (white arrow) of the third, at the mesometrial side.
Figure 2(A) Heatmap depicting the top 20 metabolites differently abundant between Pregnant and Control ULF samples based on P-values. (B) Quantitative Enrichment Analysis highlighted the metabolic pathways that were enriched in the Pregnant compared to the Control group, using the MetaboAnalyst 4.0 functional interpretation tools. The horizontal bars summarize the main metabolite sets identified in this analysis; the bars are coloured based on their P-values and the length is based on the -fold enrichment.
Figure 3Ortho PLS-DA scatter plot depicting different ULF metabolomic profiles between Control and Pregnant cows on day 7 after oestrus. Each dot in the plot represents an animal according to the metabolite profile and groups are identified with ring ellipses corresponding to 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 4Box and whisker plots of amino acids and biogenic amines that show significant (P ≤ 0.05) or approaching (P ≤ 0.1) difference between Control and Pregnant uterine luminal fluids.
Figure 7Box and whisker plots of eicosanoids and oxidation products of polyunsaturated fatty acids that show significant (P ≤ 0.05) difference between Control and Pregnant uterine luminal fluids.
Sums and ratios of amino acids (AA) and biogenic amines (BA) concentrations in uterine luminal fluid from Control (Con) and Pregnant (Preg) cows.
| Metabolite groups | Group | P valuea | Log2 Fold-changeb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con (n = 8) | Preg (n = 10) | |||
| Total AA | 19325.27 ± 1563.99 | 17447.25 ± 1895.85 | 0.36 | −0.15 |
| Non-essential AA | 18861.09 ± 1469.75 | 17136.99 ± 1859.45 | 0.37 | −0.14 |
| Acidic AA | 6766.67 ± 720.65 | 6154.43 ± 578.02 | 0.51 | −0.14 |
|
| 10951.75 ± 903.36 | 8130.94 ± 655.04 | 0.02 | −0.43 |
|
| 11807.05 ± 940.68 | 8808.92 ± 710.92 | 0.02 | −0.42 |
| Glucogenic AA | 6538.66 ± 630.91 | 5201.54 ± 661.67 | 0.17 | −0.32 |
| Glutathione precursors AA | 11229.58 ± 997.77 | 9936.98 ± 996.13 | 0.39 | −0.18 |
| Total BA | 5342.97 ± 442.49 | 4989.55 ± 675.82 | 0.70 | −0.10 |
| Spermidine/Putrescinec | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.83 | −0.09 |
| Spermine/Spermidined | 0.78 ± 0.16 | 0.57 ± 0.11 | 0.30 | −0.43 |
Values are expressed as nmol/cm2 of endometrial area; mean ± SEM. Metabolite groups definitions are in Supplemental Table S2. Groups of metabolites in bold were different between Con and Preg.
aStatistical analyses were carried out by one-way ANOVA.
bData are represented as fold-change of the metabolite concentration between Preg and Con groups.
cRatio of Spermidine to Putrescine was calculated to access the activity of Spermidine synthase.
dRatio of Spermine to Spermidine was calculated to access the activity of Spermine synthase.
Sums and ratios of carnitine and acylcarnitines (AC) concentrations in uterine luminal fluid from Control (Con) and Pregnant (Preg) cows.
| Metabolite groups | Group | P valuea | Log2 Fold-changeb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con (n = 8) | Preg (n = 10) | |||
| Total recoverable amounts of AC | 239.56 ± 37.22 | 221.77 ± 25.88 | 0.69 | −0.10 |
| Total short-chain AC | 75.86 ± 9.22 | 74.46 ± 9.22 | 0.92 | −0.03 |
| Total medium-chain AC | 15.07 ± 1.23 | 13.43 ± 0.63 | 0.23 | −0.17 |
| Total long-chain AC | 5.44 ± 0.52 | 4.80 ± 0.43 | 0.35 | −0.18 |
| Acylcarnitine/Free carnitine | 0.68 ± 0.07 | 0.57 ± 0.04 | 0.22 | −0.25 |
| Total short-chain AC/Free carnitine | 0.70 ± 0.07 | 0.64 ± 0.06 | 0.55 | −0.14 |
| CPT-I([C16 + C18]/C0) | 0.046 ± 0.004 | 0.040 ± 0.004 | 0.32 | −0.22 |
| Total esters derived from DC/Total AC | 0.032 ± 0.003 | 0.031 ± 0.003 | 0.84 | −0.04 |
| Esters derived from HO | 4.69 ± 0.33 | 4.25 ± 0.29 | 0.33 | −0.14 |
| Esters derived from DC | 6.98 ± 0.43 | 6.37 ± 0.32 | 0.25 | −0.14 |
Acylcarnitines were categorized in esters derived from dicarboxylic acids (DC), esters derived from hydroxylated acids (OH), total short-chain acylcarnitines, total medium-chain acylcarnitines and total long-chain acylcarnitines. Values are expressed as nmol/cm2 of endometrial area; mean ± SEM. Metabolite groups definitions are in Supplemental Table S2.
aStatistical analyses were carried out by one-way ANOVA.
bData are represented as fold-change of the metabolite concentration between Preg and Con groups.
Figure 5Box and whisker plots of acylcarnitines that show significant (P ≤ 0.05) or approaching (P ≤ 0.1) difference between Control and Pregnant uterine luminal fluids.
Sums and ratios of Phospholipids concentrations in uterine luminal fluid from Control (Con) and Pregnant (Preg) cows.
| Metabolite groups | Group | P valuea | Log2 Fold-changeb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con (n = 8) | Preg (n = 10) | |||
| Total recoverable amounts of phospholipids | 478.90 ± 37.61 | 429.32 ± 20.76 | 0.23 | −0.15 |
| Total recoverable amounts of LysoPC | 297.98 ± 22.49 | 280.51 ± 13.05 | 0.49 | −0.09 |
| Total recoverable amounts of PC | 182.30 ± 16.40 | 148.81 ± 9.81 | 0.08 | −0.29 |
| Total LysoPC/Total PCc | 1.66 ± 0.13 | 1.92 ± 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.21 |
| Total PC aa | 108.42 ± 12.35 | 83.71 ± 7.22 | 0.08 | −0.38 |
| Total PC ae | 73.88 ± 5.56 | 65.10 ± 3.13 | 0.16 | −0.18 |
| Total MUFA (PC) | 41.44 ± 6.16 | 30.18 ± 3.57 | 0.11 | −0.45 |
| Total PUFA (PC) | 84.33 ± 7.74 | 67.26 ± 4.87 | 0.07 | −0.32 |
| Total SFA (PC) | 56.53 ± 4.45 | 51.37 ± 2.41 | 0.29 | −0.14 |
| MUFA (PC)/SFA (PC)d | 0.74 ± 0.10 | 0.59 ± 0.06 | 0.20 | −0.34 |
| PUFA (PC)/MUFA (PC)d | 2.19 ± 0.13 | 2.33 ± 0.12 | 0.45 | 0.08 |
| 1.42 ± 0.08 | 1.24 ± 0.03 | 0.04 | −0.20 | |
Phospholipids were grouped in Phosphatidylcholines (PC) and Lysophosphatidylcholines (LysoPC), diacyl- (PC aa) or acyl-alkyl- (PC ae) phosphatidylcholines, saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA) and polyunsaturated (PUFA) glycerophosphocholines. Values are expressed as nmol/cm2 of endometrial area; mean ± SEM. Metabolite groups definitions are in Supplemental Table S2.
Groups of metabolites in bold were different between Con and Preg group.
aStatistical analyses were carried out by one-way ANOVA.
bData are represented as fold-change of the metabolite concentration between Preg and Con groups.
cRatio of LysoPC to PC is an indicator of phospholipase activity.
dRatios of MUFA to SFA, PUFA to MUFA, and PUFA to SFA were measures of the activity of fatty acid desaturases.
Figure 6Box and whisker plots of phospholipids that show significant (P ≤ 0.05) difference between Control and Pregnant uterine luminal fluids.
Sums and ratios of Sphingolipids concentrations in uterine luminal fluid from Control (Con) and Pregnant (Preg) cows.
| Metabolite groups | Group | P valuea | Log2 Fold-changeb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con (n = 8) | Preg (n = 10) | |||
| Total SM | 36.87 ± 6.50 | 28.84 ± 4.49 | 0.31 | −0.36 |
|
| 4.76 ± 0.85 | 3.18 ± 0.43 | 0.09 | −0.58 |
| Ratio SM/SM-OH | 7.85 ± 0.39 | 9.02 ± 0.51 | 0.13 | 0.20 |
| Total unsaturated SM | 5.40 ± 0.96 | 4.31 ± 0.68 | 0.36 | −0.32 |
| Total saturated SM | 31.47 ± 5.55 | 24.53 ± 3.85 | 0.31 | −0.36 |
Metabolites were grouped in sphingomyelins (SM) and hydroxysphingomyelins (SM-OH) and according to the unsaturation. Values are expressed as nmol/cm2 of endometrial area; mean ± SEM. Metabolite groups definitions are in Supplemental Table S2.
Group of metabolites in bold tended to be different between Con and Preg group.
aStatistical analyses were carried out by one-way ANOVA.
bData are represented as fold-change of the metabolite concentration between Preg and Con groups.
Eicosanoids and oxidation products of polyunsaturated fatty acids concentration in uterine luminal fluid from Control (Con) and Pregnant (Preg) cows.
| Metabolite | Group | P value | FDR significancea | Log2 Fold-changeb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con (n = 8) | Preg (n = 10) | ||||
| Arachidonic acid | 12.95 ± 1.81 | 18.27 ± 0.90 | 0.18 | n.s. | 0.50 |
| Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) | 2.58 ± 0.25 | 3.47 ± 0.11 | 0.06 | n.s. | 0.43 |
| 0.14 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.004 | 0.009 | * | −1.12 | |
| 0.06 ± 0.006 | 0.15 ± 0.003 | 0.0001 | ** | 1.34 | |
| 0.013 ± 0.005 | 0.038 ± 0.003 | 0.02 | * | 1.51 | |
| 6-keto-Prostaglandin F1alpha (PGI2)d | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.002 | 0.74 | n.s. | 0.06 |
| Prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2α)d | 0.07 ± 0.004 | 0.09 ± 0.001 | 0.04 | n.s. | 0.24 |
Values are expressed as nmol/cm2 of endometrial area; mean ± SEM. Biochemical name, abbreviation and PubChem CID of metabolites are listed in Supplemental Table S1 by class.
Metabolites in bold were different between Con and Preg group by ANOVA followed by FDR correction.
aStatistical analyses were carried out by one-way ANOVA followed by FDR correction for multiple comparisons. Magnitude of effect is indicated by: **P ≤ 0.01; *P ≤ 0.05; n.s. P > 0.05.
bData are represented as fold-change of the metabolite concentration between Preg and Con groups.
cLipoxygenase metabolite products.
dCyclooxygenase metabolite products.
Sums of eicosanoids and oxidation products of polyunsaturated fatty acids concentrations in uterine luminal fluid from Control (Con) and Pregnant (Preg) cows.
| Metabolite groups | Group | P valuea | Log2 Fold-changeb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con (n = 8) | Preg (n = 10) | |||
| COX pathway | 0.152 ± 0.009 | 0.167 ± 0.007 | 0.20 | 0.14 |
| LOX pathway | 0.224 ± 0.041 | 0.225 ± 0.031 | 0.98 | 0.00 |
Metabolites were grouped according to it derivation from the cycloxygenase (COX) and lipoxygenase (LOX) pathways. Values are expressed as nmol/cm2 of endometrial area; mean ± SEM. Metabolite groups definitions are in Supplemental Table S2.
aStatistical analyses were carried out by one-way ANOVA.
bData are represented as fold-change of the metabolite concentration between Preg and Con groups.
Figure 8Relative mRNA abundance of Lipoxygenases, PPARG-pathway associated genes and Glycine Transporter in Control and Pregnant endometrial samples dissected from the uterotubal junction and the lengthwise intermediate portion of the anterior third of the ipsilateral uterine horn. Data are shown as arbitrary units; mean ± SEM.
Figure 9Summary and integration of the main results. Metabolomic measurements reveal an overall decrease in substrate concentration in uterine luminal fluid recovered from pregnant (Preg) compared to control cyclic (Con) cows on day 7 post oestrus. (1) Concentrations of two metabolites 12(S)-HETE and 15(S)-HETE, associated to the lipoxygenases pathway, were significantly greater in the Preg group. Transcripts for lipoxygenases were up- (ALOX12) and downregulated (ALOX15B) in the uterotubal junction of Preg animals, suggesting an endometrial origin of regulation of Lipoxygenases-derived metabolites in ULF. (2) Glycine and sarcosine were significantly lower in abundance in ULF recovered from Preg compared to Con cows. A downregulation of SLC6A9 (a Glycine transporter) transcripts was found in the Preg endometrial tissue, that was consistent with the lower Glycine concentration in ULF. Exposure to a day 7 embryo modulates the concentration of (3) phospholipids and (4) acylcarnitines concentration in ULF. We propose that metabolite composition of the ULF changes in response to a pre-hatching embryo in vivo.