| Literature DB >> 31174480 |
Yubang Shen1,2, Le Wang2, Jianjun Fu3, Xiaoyan Xu1, Gen Hua Yue4,5,6, Jiale Li7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genetic diversity within a species reflects population evolution, ecology, and ability to adapt. Genome-wide population surveys of both natural and introduced populations provide insights into genetic diversity, the evolutionary processes and the genetic basis underlying local adaptation. Grass carp is the most important freshwater foodfish species for food and water weed control. However, there is as yet no overall picture on genetic variations and population structure of this species, which is important for its aquaculture.Entities:
Keywords: Aquaculture; Diversity; Evolution; Grass carp; Population structure; SNP
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31174480 PMCID: PMC6555922 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5872-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Principal component analyses for (a) all nine locations and (b) six native locations of grass carp based on all genotyped SNPs, where PC1 and PC2 contain all the meaningful signals. The native locations are annotated with the river systems where they were collected (Y, H and P corresponding to the Yangtze, Heilongjiang and Pearl River Systems, respectively), while the introduced locations are indicated with I
Fig. 2Population structure across six native locations from three river systems (Heilongjiang (H), Yangtze (Y) and Pearl (P) River Systems, respectively) and three introduced locations (I) of grass carp as inferred using Admixture at K = 4 and 6. Each vertical line represents one individual, while each colour shows the genetic composition that is assigned into a distinct genetic cluster
Fig. 3Three competing scenarios used for inferring the population origin of the introduced location in Malaysia (a) and the two South Asian locations in India and Nepal (b). For both (a) and (b), scenario 1 involves an admixture source population from the Yangtze and Pearl River Systems, while scenarios 2 and 3 have the introduced population originating from the Yangtze and the Pearl River Systems, respectively
Posterior probabilities with 95% confidence interval of each of the three competing scenarios used for inferring the source population of introduced grass carp, and the type I and II errors for each competing scenario
| Scenario | Posterior probability (95% CI) | Type I error | Type II error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | |||
| Scenario 1 |
|
|
|
| Scenario 2 | 0.014 (0.000, 0.110) | 0.002 | 0.019 |
| Scenario 3 | 0.180 (0.081, 0.279) | 0.007 | 0.022 |
| India and Nepal | |||
| Scenario 1 |
|
|
|
| Scenario 2 | 0.068 (0.054, 0.082) | 0.006 | 0.024 |
| Scenario 3 | 0.005 (0.004, 0.007) | 0.008 | 0.014 |
The best competing scenario is indicated in bold. Scenario 1, the introduced population originated from an admixture population of both the Yangtze and the Pearl River Systems; Scenario 2, the introduced population originated directly from the Yangtze River System; and Scenario 3, the introduced population originated directly from the Pearl River System
Results of Bayenv and two F-based outlier tests, Arlequin and BayeScan for identifying footprints of local selection across six native locations, using whole data set and data set reduced by excluding individuals (10) in Nenjiang showing significant genetic composition from both the Yangtze and Pearl River Systems. The common loci indicate the loci shared between two corresponding tests
| Tests | Whole data set | Reduced data set | Common loci |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bayenv | 71 | 70 | 0 |
| Arlequin | 276 | 285 | 175 |
| BayeScan | 183 | 185 | 142 |
| Common | 128 | 127 | 94 |
Results of two F-based outlier tests, Arlequin and BayeScan for identifying positive and balancing selection across six native and three introduced locations, using whole data set and data set reduced by excluding individuals in Nenjiang (10) showing significant genetic composition from both the Yangtze and Pearl River Systems. The common loci indicate the loci shared between two corresponding tests
| Outlier tests | Whole data set | Reduced data set | Common loci | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Balancing | Positive | Balancing | Positive | Balancing | |
| Arlequin | 352 | 169 | 335 | 206 | 287 | 148 |
| BayeScan | 206 | 65 | 191 | 77 | 161 | 59 |
| Common | 13 | 61 | 11 | 74 | 7 | 58 |
Annotation of candidate genes under putative selection consistently identified by both outlier tests and Bayenv association tests
| Locus | Annotation | Gene name | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|
| 428 | ENSDARG00000010097 | Coagulation factor IXa ( | 0.288 |
| 3729 | ENSDARG00000060016 | Nuclear receptor binding SET domain protein 1a ( | 0.154 |
| 8253 | ENSDARG00000023445 | ATPase, Ca++ transporting, plasma membrane 3b ( | 0.194 |
| 46,475 | ENSDARG00000058821 | Semaphorin 5A ( | 0.158 |
| 52,319 | ENSDARG00000076364 | Erythrocyte Membrane protein band 4.1 like 1 ( | 0.187 |
| 80,064 | ENSDARG00000013250 | Threonyl-tRNA synthetase ( | 0.265 |
| 88,973 | ENSDARG00000018418 | Parathyroid hormone 1 receptor b ( | 0.215 |
| 92,870 | ENSDARG00000005479 | Teneurin transmembrane protein 3 ( | 0.179 |
| 113,810 | ENSDARG00000074636 | Centrosomal protein 170B ( | 0.294 |
| 128,568 | ENSDARG00000073933 | GRB2 associated, regulator of MAPK1-like ( | 0.189 |
| 153,644 | ENSDARG00000039241 | Protein kinase C, alpha ( | 0.175 |
| 217,623 | ENSDARG00000003403 | Teneurin transmembrane protein 1 ( | 0.223 |
| 78,588 | ENSDARG00000020057 | Bone morphogenetic protein receptor, type II b ( | 0.089 |
| 309,269 | ENSDARG00000028533 | Microtubule-actin crosslinking factor 1a ( | 0.193 |
| 18,761 | ENSDARG00000037079 | Cilia and flagella associated protein 36 ( | 0.136 |
| 154,823 | ENSDARG00000043963 | si:ch211-241j12.3 | 0.369 |
| 149,896 | ENSDARG00000052766 | si:ch211-239f4.1 | 0.083 |
| 217,867 | ENSDARG00000076998 | si:ch73-92i20.1 | 0.207 |