Literature DB >> 31174127

Microplastic abundance in atmospheric deposition within the Metropolitan area of Hamburg, Germany.

Malin Klein1, Elke K Fischer2.   

Abstract

Only few studies investigated the input of microplastic particles via the atmosphere, so far. Here, we present results on microplastic concentrations in the atmospheric deposition in the metropolitan region of Hamburg. In total, six investigation sites were equipped with three bulk precipitation samplers each and sampled biweekly over 12 weeks (12/17-03/18). Three sites were located in a rural area south of Hamburg comprising one open field site and two throughfall sites under beech/oak and Douglas fir forest canopy, respectively. Three further sites were selected within the city following a transect from north to south representing urban sites of varying degrees concerning population, traffic and industrial pressures. Particles and fibers were counted under UV light within a photo box and under a fluorescence microscope (Axio Lab A.1, Zeiss). Results show that microplastic particles are ubiquitous at all sites. A median abundance between 136.5 and 512.0 microplastic particles per m2/day has been found over the sampling period. This equals a mean microplastic abundance of 275 particles/m2/day μRaman spectroscopy showed that polyethylenes/ethylvinyl acetate copolymers are dominating significantly (48.8 and 22.0%, respectively), 16 particles analyzed (14.6%) were identified as contamination from PE (polyethylene) samplers. In contrast to other studies, fragments were significantly dominating compared to fibers. The spatial distribution comparing the urban sites concentrations followed in the order from high to low: "north" (Henstedt-Ulzburg, low population density, suburb) - "center" (University; large population density) - "south" (Wilhelmsburg, middle population density, port and industrial facilities) with highly varying concentrations within the time series. Surprisingly, the rural sites in the southern part of Hamburg showed highest concentrations (Douglas fir > open field > beech/oak). This finding is most likely a result of factors such as the comb out capacity of the different forest types and/or direct input pathways from the agricultural areas and the nearby highway.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; Comb-out effect; Fluorescence microscopy; Nile red staining; μRaman spectroscopy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31174127     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  21 in total

1.  Direct radiative effects of airborne microplastics.

Authors:  Laura E Revell; Peter Kuma; Eric C Le Ru; Walter R C Somerville; Sally Gaw
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Microplastics in environment: global concern, challenges, and controlling measures.

Authors:  G Lamichhane; A Acharya; R Marahatha; B Modi; R Paudel; A Adhikari; B K Raut; S Aryal; N Parajuli
Journal:  Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran)       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 3.  Airborne microplastics: a review study on method for analysis, occurrence, movement and risks.

Authors:  Christian Ebere Enyoh; Andrew Wirnkor Verla; Evelyn Ngozi Verla; Francis Chizoruo Ibe; Collins Emeka Amaobi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Constraining the atmospheric limb of the plastic cycle.

Authors:  Janice Brahney; Natalie Mahowald; Marje Prank; Gavin Cornwell; Zbigniew Klimont; Hitoshi Matsui; Kimberly Ann Prather
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Polystyrene microplastic contamination versus microplankton abundances in two lagoons of the Florida Keys.

Authors:  Susan Badylak; Edward Phlips; Christopher Batich; Miranda Jackson; Anna Wachnicka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Accumulation of airborne microplastics in lichens from a landfill dumping site (Italy).

Authors:  Stefano Loppi; Brett Roblin; Luca Paoli; Julian Aherne
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Environmental Impacts of Microplastics and Nanoplastics: A Current Overview.

Authors:  Ayodeji Amobonye; Prashant Bhagwat; Sindhu Raveendran; Suren Singh; Santhosh Pillai
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Environmental fate, toxicity and risk management strategies of nanoplastics in the environment: Current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Liuwei Wang; Wei-Min Wu; Nanthi S Bolan; Daniel C W Tsang; Yang Li; Muhan Qin; Deyi Hou
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 10.588

9.  Examination of the ocean as a source for atmospheric microplastics.

Authors:  Steve Allen; Deonie Allen; Kerry Moss; Gaël Le Roux; Vernon R Phoenix; Jeroen E Sonke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Microplastics generated when opening plastic packaging.

Authors:  Zahra Sobhani; Yongjia Lei; Youhong Tang; Liwei Wu; Xian Zhang; Ravi Naidu; Mallavarapu Megharaj; Cheng Fang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.