Arsheed A Ganaie1, Aijaz Parray2, Tabish Hussain3, Ashraf Shabaneh4, Anmbreen Jamroze5, Marina G Ferrari1, Lei Wang6, D Joshua Liao6, Shahriar Koochekpour7, Sanjeev Nanda8, Jinhua Wang4, Yibin Deng6, Sergio A Gradilone9, Edward H Hinchcliffe10, Badrinath R Konety1, Mohammad Saleem11. 1. Department of Urology, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 2. Department of Urology, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Translational Research Institute, Academic Health Systems Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar. 3. Department of Urology, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; MD Anderson Cancer Center, Science Park, Smithville, TX. 4. Institute for Health Informatics, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. 5. Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN. 6. Department of Cancer Genetics, Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN. 7. Department of Urology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida. 8. Department of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 9. Cancer Cell Biology and Translational Research Section, Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, MN. 10. Cellular Dynamics Section, The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota. 11. Department of Urology, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. Electronic address: msbhat@umn.edu.
Abstract
Therapy failure and metastasis-associated mortality are stumbling blocks in the management of PDAC in patients. Failure of therapy is associated to intense hypoxic conditions of tumors. To develop effective therapies, a complete understanding of hypoxia-associated changes in genetic landscape of tumors during disease progression is needed. Because artificially immortalized cell lines do not rightly represent the disease progression, studying genetics of tumors in spontaneous models is warranted. In the current study, we generated a spectrum of spontaneous human (UM-PDC1; UM-PDC2) and murine (HI-PanL, HI-PancI, HI-PanM) models representing localized, invasive, and metastatic PDAC from a patient and transgenic mice (K-rasG12D/Pdxcre/Ink4a/p16-/). These spontaneous models grow vigorously under hypoxia and exhibit activated K-ras signaling, progressive loss of PTEN, and tumorigenicity in vivo. Whereas UM-PDC1 form localized tumors, the UM-PDC2 metastasize to lungs in mice. In an order of progression, these models exhibit genomic instability marked by gross chromosomal rearrangements, centrosome-number variations, Aurora-kinase/H2AX colocalization, loss of primary cilia, and α-tubulin acetylation. The RNA sequencing of hypoxic models followed by qRT-PCR validation and gene-set enrichment identified Intestine-Specific Homeobox factor (ISX)-driven molecular pathway as an indicator PDAC aggressivness. TCGA-PAAD clinical data analysis showed high ISX expression correlation to poor survival of PDAC patients, particularly women. The functional studies showed ISX as a regulator of i) invasiveness and migratory potential and ii) VEGF, MMP2, and NFκB activation in PDAC cells. We suggest that ISX is a potential druggable target and newly developed spontaneous cell models are valuable tools for studying mechanism and testing therapies for PDAC.
Therapy failure and metastasis-associated mortality are stumbling blocks in the management of PDAC in patients. Failure of therapy is associated to intense hypoxic conditions of tumors. To develop effective therapies, a complete understanding of hypoxia-associated changes in genetic landscape of tumors during disease progression is needed. Because artificially immortalized cell lines do not rightly represent the disease progression, studying genetics of tumors in spontaneous models is warranted. In the current study, we generated a spectrum of spontaneous human (UM-PDC1; UM-PDC2) and murine (HI-PanL, HI-PancI, HI-PanM) models representing localized, invasive, and metastatic PDAC from a patient and transgenic mice (K-rasG12D/Pdxcre/Ink4a/p16-/). These spontaneous models grow vigorously under hypoxia and exhibit activated K-ras signaling, progressive loss of PTEN, and tumorigenicity in vivo. Whereas UM-PDC1 form localized tumors, the UM-PDC2 metastasize to lungs in mice. In an order of progression, these models exhibit genomic instability marked by gross chromosomal rearrangements, centrosome-number variations, Aurora-kinase/H2AX colocalization, loss of primary cilia, and α-tubulin acetylation. The RNA sequencing of hypoxic models followed by qRT-PCR validation and gene-set enrichment identified Intestine-Specific Homeobox factor (ISX)-driven molecular pathway as an indicator PDAC aggressivness. TCGA-PAAD clinical data analysis showed high ISX expression correlation to poor survival of PDAC patients, particularly women. The functional studies showed ISX as a regulator of i) invasiveness and migratory potential and ii) VEGF, MMP2, and NFκB activation in PDAC cells. We suggest that ISX is a potential druggable target and newly developed spontaneous cell models are valuable tools for studying mechanism and testing therapies for PDAC.
Majority of the pancreatic cancer (PDAC) cases are diagnosed as metastatic disease, whereas only 10%-15% of the cases are recommended for surgery, the only standard care available to such patients [1]. PDAC patients exhibit poor prognosis with a median survival time of <6 months, and approximately 85% therapy-receiving patients develop drug resistance and recurrent disease [2,3]. The failure of conventional therapies can be attributed to an incomplete understanding of the complex pathophysiology of disease and absence of reliable diagnostic/or prognostic markers [4,5]. It is believed that for the early detection and effective treatment, a complete understanding of molecular basis of PDAC progression is required. To study the molecular mechanism underlying PDAC, cell line models exhibiting either wild-type K-ras (BxPC3, Hs766T) or mutant K-ras (PanC1, AsPC1, MIA PaCa-2, Capan-1, Capan-2, HPAC, HPAF-II, SU-86.86) expression have been used by investigators [6]. These cell models display disparate genotypes and phenotypes [6]. In addition, majority of the mentioned models are artificially immortalized, represent one unique stage of disease, and are of multipatient origin. These limitations preclude the use of immortalized models for studying disease progression. There is a need to develop spontaneous models (without artificial immortalization) which belong to same genetic background, show phenotype changes over a period of time, and mimic disease progression. In this study, we established spontaneous i) human models representing localized and metastatic PDAC and ii) K-ras/p16 background spontaneous murine models progression model (representing localized, primary invasive, and metastatic stage, respectively). We studied the gross changes in the i) genomic stability and ii) genetic landscape in pancreatic neoplastic cells when the disease progresses from localized to metastatic form.The dysregulation in the activities of various of transcriptional factors during the progression of PDAC in humans is a common event [7]. However, the critical transcriptional factors which are required for acquiring of metastasis phenotype or driving of metastasis of pancreatic carcinoma cells are poorly understood. The Homeo domain containing transcription factors family plays significant role in the differentiation and morphogenesis during early embryonic development, and dysegulation of homeobox gene expression (resulting in hyper cell proliferation) has been reported in several humancancers [8]. Based on the RNA sequencing of pancreatic cell models, we identified Intestine Specific Homeobox gene (ISX) transcriptional factor critical for progression of PDAC from localized to metastasis. We investigated the critical role played by ISX in acquiring the metastatic phenotype by PDAC cells. Using PDAC patient specimens, human/murine models, bioinformatics, and publically vailable Cancer Genome data, we establish the relevance of ISX-driven molecular signature as a novel disease staging marker and a potential therapeutic target for treating metastatic PDAC.
Material and Methods
Antibodies and Plasmids
Pancreatic marker antibody set (anti–α-amylase, anti-PDX1, and anti-PLA2GB), anti-ERK, anti-p38, anti-AKT, anti–phospho-AKT, anti-NFκB, anti–phospho-NFκB-p65, anti–E-Cadherin, anti–Cytokeratin-8, anti-vimentin, anti-PCNA, anti-PTEN, and anti–β-actin antibodies were procured from Cell Signaling technology (Danvers, MA). Anti-VEGF antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz laboratories (Dallas, TX). Anti–K-ras-GTP and anti–K-ras antibodies were purchased from NewEast Biosciences Labs (King of Prussia, PA). Anti-ISX antibody was purchased from Novus biologicals (Littleton, CO). Anti–acetylated-α-tubulin antibody was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Reporter plasmids pGL3-VEGF and pGL3-MMP2 were obtained from a plasmid repository (Addgene, Cambridge, MA).
Cell Culture
ASPC1 cells were purchased from ATCC and cultured in RMP1 medium. HI-PanL, HI-PancI, HI-PancM, and UM-PDC cell models were generated and characterized by us. The cell models were characterized for chromosome number (karyotyping) at Roswell Park Cancer Institute (Buffalo, NY) and Cytogenomics Core Laboratory of Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota. Human UM-PDC1 and UM-PDC2 cell lines developed in our laboratory are maintained in DMEM culture medium. All cell lines were authenticated for human and mouse STR Profiling at Genetica Cell Line Testing, (Burlington, NC).
Human Patient Tumor
The pancreatic tumors of PDAC patient (nonidentifiable) who underwent the surgery at the Vanderbilt University (Nashville, TN) was procured through National Cancer Institute–supported Cooperative Human Tissue Network.
Transgenic Mouse Breeder Colonies
The breeder pairs of genetically engineered mouse models belonging to genotype LSL-K-ras
(LSL-K-ras/Nci), PDX1, and Ink4a/Arf null (Cdkn2a/) mice were procured from NCI/NIH mouse repository (Fredrick, Baltimore). The breeding and genotyping were performed as per vendors’ instructions. The information about the primer combinations used for genotyping by using PCR method is provided in the Supplementary Figure 1A.
Generation of Transgenic K-rasPdxp16 Mice
For the targeted expression of oncogenic K-ras in pancreas, K-ras
Pdx transgenicmouse models as described by Bardeesy et al. and Hingorani et al. [9,10] were used. Briefly, a mouse model expressing a Cre-activated K-ras allele inserted into the endogenous K-ras locus, and these mice were crossed with mice expressing Cre recombinase in pancreatic tissue by virtue of a PDX-1 promoter-driven transgene. The subsequent recombination resulted in interbreeding K-rasmice with animals that express Cre recombinase from the pancreatic-specific promoters PDX-1. The loss of functional G1 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor Ink4a/p16 is the universal event of PDAC; however, constitutive deletion of only Ink4a/p16 is not sufficient to develop advanced stages of PDAC. Therefore, with cross-breeding between K-ras
Pdx and p16mice was performed to generate transgenic K-rasPdx/p16genotype mice which exhibit an earlier appearance of PanIN lesions followed by rapid progression into highly invasive and metastatic PDAC. All transgenic mice were tested for parent K-ras mutation and p16 deletion (Supplementary Figure 1, B-C).
Generation of Spontaneous Human and Murine PDAC Models
We generated spontaneous (without artificial immortalization) murine and human cell-based progression models of PDAC disease. These models belonged to the same genetic background and represent different phenotypes/stages of PDAC disease. These were generated as follows:Murine cell-based progression model of PDAC progression. Mousepancreatic progression model cell lines were generated from spontaneous tumors developed in K-ras/Pdx/p16transgenic mice. Briefly, we euthanized two littermate mice of K-ras
Pdx
p16 genetic background. While one mouse exhibited the organ confined tumor, the other mouse exhibited relatively larger tumor with visible invasive nodules on body wall and liver. Tumor tissues were carefully removed and immediately transferred to culture medium (RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS.) followed by careful mincing under sterilized condition. Minced tumor tissues were grown as tumor explants as one explant per culture dish in soft-agar plated culture dishes. After 48 hours, explants were supplemented with fresh media and cultures were observed under microscope for cell propagation from explants. The noticeable observation was the growth of cells around the tumor explants after 1 week of seeding. The explants were removed when culture plates exhibited 100% confluence level of cells. Microscopic observation for the phenotype of cells suggested a heterogeneous mixture of fibroblast like cells (elongated) and epithelial cells (cobblestone). To generate the epithelial cell population, the heterogeneous mixture cells were allowed to undergo serial propagations for several weeks. With each week, the mixture of cells exhibited increased number of epithelial and decreased number of fibroblasts. At 12 weeks of serial propagation, homogenous epithelial cells from pancreatic tissues and metastatic nodules were obtained. Finally, three cells lines were generated from two littermates (same parents) and with similar genetic background K-ras
Pdx
p16. These were named as HI-Panc-L (derived from pancreatic tissue showing localized growth, small tumor, and no metastasis), HI-Panc-I (derived from invasive pancreatic tumor, showing body-wall metastasis invasion), and HI-Panc-M (derived from metastatic liver nodule).Human cell-based progression model of PDAC: A human spontaneous model representing primary PDAC was developed from the pancreatic tumor of a (nonidentifiable) patient who did undergo the surgery at the Vanderbilt University (Nashville, TN). After surgery, tumor tissues were immediately transferred to the author’s laboratory within 12 hours. Primary tumor cells were derived from humantumor using the same method as described for mousetumor-derived cell models. The human model represents primary stage of PDAC disease and was named as UM-PDC1 (University of Minnesota-pancreatic ductal carcinoma) cells. UM-PDC1 cells were implanted in SCIDmice to test the tumorigenic potential. UM-PDC1tumors which exhibited tumors in SCIDmice were harvested and used for deriving a second generation of UM-PDC cell line, which we named as UM-PDC2.
Tumor Xenograft Studies in Immunocompromised Mice
Murine cell models (HI-PancL, Hi-PancI, HI-PancM) were implanted (5 × 106 cells in 100 μl Matrigel/media; 50/50%) subcutaneously in athymic nude mice. Human cell model UMPDC was implanted (5 × 106 cells 100 μl Matrigel) subcutaneously in SCIDmice. Animal were followed for tumor growth (in terms of volume), and tumor volume and weights were measured on a twice/week basis as described [11].
Chromosomal Arrangement and Karyotyping Assay
The human cell model karyotyping was performed by LeAnn Oseth at the Cytogenomics Center, University of Minnesota, whereas the murine cell model karyotyping was performed at the cytology core facility at the Roswell Park Cancer Center (Buffalo, NY). Briefly, three wells of a six-well plate of pancreatic tumor cells were exposed to colcemid treatment for 2 hours. Cells were harvested according to the standard cytogenetic protocol [12]. The metaphases (n=20) were completely analyzed at a 400-band level resolution.
These were performed by using the methods as described previously [11,13]. Single-cell centrosome detection was performed as per the method provided in the supplementary tables and methods section.
Cilia Analysis
Cells were grown in four-well glass slides and, when confluent, incubated for 24 hours with DMEM without serum to stimulate ciliary growth [14,15]. Cells were then washed with PBS, fixed with iced methanol, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100, and blocked with 0.1% Triton X100 and 10% normal goat serum in PBS. Cells were incubated overnight with antibodies against acetylated α-tubulin (1:200, Sigma-Aldrich) and γ-tubulin (1:500, Sigma-Aldrich) at 4°C followed by incubation for 1 hour with fluorescent secondary antibodies (1:200). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (Prolong Gold w/DAPI, Invitrogen), and ciliated cells were analyzed using confocal microscopy.
RNA Sequencing of Cell Models
We performed the RNA-seq analysis of hypoxic cell models. For this purpose, PDAC models were treated with cobalt chloride 100 μM for 24 hours. Cells were harvested and pellets were prepared in high-stringent and sanitized conditions (to avoid any exogenous RNA/DNA contamination). Cell pellets were transferred to the genomic center where high-quality RNA was extracted from these models. The libraries were prepared and analyzed on Illumina 2000 platform for sequencing. The initial data screening was performed by Bioinformatics core (Masonic cancer center, University of Minnesota). FPKM values were log transformed and mean centered prior to filtering for large changes. The RNA sequencing data were validated by quantitative real-time PCR analysis of top 50 genes (top 50 showing marked difference when compared localized tumor vs metastatic tumor) using murine (HIPanL, HIPancI, HI-PancM) and human (UM-PDC1, UM-PDC2) models. The primer information for QRT-PCR is provided in Supplementary Table 1. The RNA-seq data were submitted to GEO/NIH data base (Accession # GSE116635).
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA)
The GSEA algorithm was applied to RNA-seq data for enrichment analysis. Log2 fold change was applied as the preranking metric ranking [16].
Association and Patient Survival Analysis
The comparison of ISX gene expression between pancreatic tumor tissue and normal tissues was done by an analysis using UALCAN (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu) and TCGA-PAAD clinical dataset of pancreatic carcinomapatients [17]. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate correlations. All patients were divided into two groups according to gene expression level in tumor tissue for survival analysis. The high-expression group consisted of patients in which gene expression levels were above the median value, and a low-expression group comprised the remaining patients. We stratified the analysis on the basis of associations between ISX gene expression and clinical features in OS such as gender, tumor stage, and age. The clinical features were adjusted in multivariate Cox proportion hazard regression analysis.
Statistical Analysis
Student’s t test for independent analysis was applied to evaluate differences between the normoxia and hypoxia cell conditions with respect to the growth, invasion and expression of proteins. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with the corresponding log-rank was used to measure the rate of mean tumor volume growth as a function of time. A P value of <.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Result
Transgenic K-ras/Pdx/ p16 Mice
TransgenicK-ras/Pdx or p16 did not show malignant/metastatic PDAC formation; however, K-ras/Pdx/p16mice exhibited spontaneous pancreatic tumors, invasion of tumor in adjacent body wall, and liver metastasis (Figure 1A). The K-ras/Pdx/p16mice manifested multiple pancreatic tumor nodules that varied greatly in size (Figure 1A). These data are in agreement with findings of Bardeesy et al. and Aguirre et al. [10,18]. The overall survival in K-ras/Pdx/p16mice is significantly lower (<7 months) when compared to K-ras/Pdx mice (80% of mice lived up to 13 months) (Figure 1B). The majority of pancreatic tissues of K-rasPdx mice displayed high-grade PanIN formation and no ductal adenocarcinoma. On IHC analysis, majority of these tissues exhibited positive E-cadherin and negative vimentin staining (Figure 1C, panel 1). Nevertheless, some PanIN lesions were noted to be vimentin positive (Figure 1C, panel 1). H&E staining of the paraffin sections of K-rasPdx/p16pancreatic tumors confirmed that most nodules were ductal adenocarcinomas, ranging from well-differentiated to moderately differentiated histology (which were E-cadherin positive and vimentin negative) (Figure 1C, panel 3). However, regional mesenchymal features were also observed in some tumors which tested positive for vimentin (Figure 1C, panel 3). Histologically, most liver tumors manifested poorly differentiated morphology with sarcomatoid/mesenchymal features; however, some regions continued to exhibit ductal histology testing positive for E-cadherin (Figure 1C, panel 4). Autopsy did not find macroscopic lesions in the lung, kidney, stomach, spleen, and other abdominal organs or lymph nodes.
Figure 1
Transgenic mice developed spontaneous localized, invasive, and metastatic pancreatic tumors. (A) Photographs showing the primary tumor and metastasis development in K-rasPdxp16 mice. (B) Line graph shows the comparison in the survival (as a function of age) of transgenic K-ras/Pdxversus K-rasPdxp16 mice. (C) Image showing the H&E and immunostaining for E-Cadherin and vimentin (phenotype markers) in primary and metastatic tumor (liver) resected from K-ras/PdxINK4A/p16and K-ras, Pdxp16 mice. Staining showed the pattern of E-Cadherin and Vimentin expression in spontaneous localized and metastatic pancreatic tumors in different transgenic mice. (D) Photographs showing the mouse tumors (from which cell lines HI-Panc-L, HI-Panc-I, and HI-PANC-M were generated). Light microscopy images showing morphology for HI-Panc-L HI-Panc-I and HI-Panc-M cells. (Ei) Photographs showing the human tumor specimen and scheme (by which UM-PDC1 and UM-PDC2 cell lines were generated). Light microscopy image showing morphology for human UMPDC cells. (Eii) H&E and IHC staining shows the metastatic potential of UM-PDC2 cell line in vivo. Paraffin sections of lungs were stained for H&E and IHC (for human mitochondrial protein) to determine the metastatic potential of UM-PDC1 and UM-PDC2 cells in a mouse tail vein/lung-metastasis model. Bar graph shows the quantification of metastatic nodules in lungs of mice.
Transgenic mice developed spontaneous localized, invasive, and metastatic pancreatic tumors. (A) Photographs showing the primary tumor and metastasis development in K-rasPdxp16 mice. (B) Line graph shows the comparison in the survival (as a function of age) of transgenicK-ras/Pdxversus K-rasPdxp16 mice. (C) Image showing the H&E and immunostaining for E-Cadherin and vimentin (phenotype markers) in primary and metastatic tumor (liver) resected from K-ras/PdxINK4A/p16and K-ras, Pdxp16 mice. Staining showed the pattern of E-Cadherin and Vimentin expression in spontaneous localized and metastatic pancreatic tumors in different transgenic mice. (D) Photographs showing the mousetumors (from which cell lines HI-Panc-L, HI-Panc-I, and HI-PANC-M were generated). Light microscopy images showing morphology for HI-Panc-L HI-Panc-I and HI-Panc-M cells. (Ei) Photographs showing the humantumor specimen and scheme (by which UM-PDC1 and UM-PDC2 cell lines were generated). Light microscopy image showing morphology for human UMPDC cells. (Eii) H&E and IHC staining shows the metastatic potential of UM-PDC2 cell line in vivo. Paraffin sections of lungs were stained for H&E and IHC (for human mitochondrial protein) to determine the metastatic potential of UM-PDC1 and UM-PDC2 cells in a mouse tail vein/lung-metastasis model. Bar graph shows the quantification of metastatic nodules in lungs of mice.
Characterization of Murine (HI-Panc-L, HI-Panc-I, HI-Panc-M) and Human (UM-PDC1 and UM-PDC2) Progression Models
The generation of HI-Panc and UM-PDC cell models is described in Materials and Methods. HI-Panc-I and HI-Panc-M cells display a typical cobblestone morphology, whereas HI-Panc-L cells though epithelial are elongated with a similarity to fibroblastic morphology (Figure 1D). Human primary and invasive tumor cell lines UM-PDC1 and UM-PDC2 are cobblestone shaped with clear demarcations of membrane and nucleus (Figure 1Ei).
Determining Metastatic Potential of Human UMPDC Models
A homogenous population of UM-PDC2 exhibits aggressive/invasive phenotype than UM-PDC1. We next determined the metastatic potential of human UM-PDC models in R2G2-immunocompromised mouse models. The metastasis potential of cells was determined by using a tail-vein injection in mouse model. R2G2 mice were injected with cells (UM-PDC1 and UM-PDC2), and mice were euthanized after 3 weeks. The gross metastasis in lungs and liver of mice was examined (using India ink method). The micrometastasis was determined by H&E and IHC analysis of tissues. The IHC analysis using human anti-mitochondrial protein marker antibody (that recognized human cells) confirmed the colonization of pancreatic tumors cells in the lung. The anti-mitochondrial protein marker was positive in UM-PDC2 metastatic nodules (Figure 1Eii). These data suggest that UM-PDC1 and UM-PDC2 represent a human spontaneous PDAC progression model (from same genetic background) and represent localized and metastatic stages of disease, respectively.Characterization of HI-PancL, HI-PancI, HI-PancM and UM-PDC models. (A) Immunoblot images showing the expression of (Ai-Aii) pancreatic markers (α-Amylase, Pdx1, and PLA2G1B) and (Aiii-Aiv) K-ras activity status in murine (HI-Panc-L, HI-Panc-I, & HI-Panc-M) and human PDAC models (UM-PDC). A known PDAC cell line AsPC1 was used as a reference control. (B) Immunoblot images showing the expression of (Bi-Bii) downstream targets of K-ras pathway (ERK1/2, p38, pAkt, total Akt, pNFκB-p65, total NFκB-p65, VEGF), epithelial markers (E-Cadherin, Cytokeratin-8), and proliferation marker (PCNA) in murine and human PDAC models. (C) Histograms showing the (Ci) cell doubling time (in hour units) n=3 replicates/model; (Cii) 3-dimensional clonogenic potential of HI-Panc-L, HI-Panc-I, HI-Panc-M, and UM-PDC models; (Ciii) invasiveness potential; and (D) the tumorigenic potential of cell models as xenografts in mouse models (Di) photographs showing intact tumors on athymic nude (for murine models) and SCID (for human model) mice. (Dii) Line graph showing the growth of tumors in mice as a function of time to average tumor volume (n=5). (Diii) Graph showing the average weight of tumors formed by cell models when implanted in immunocompromised mice (n=5).For the systematic characterization of models, we tested cells for the standard pancreatic markers α-Amylase, Pdx1, and PLA2GB by employing immunoblot analysis. All cell lines tested positive for pancreatic markers, and AsPC1pancreatic cell line was used as positive control (Figure 2Ai). Anti-Pdx1 antibody is specific to mouse and therefore was not detected on immunoblot band for human cells (Figure 2, Ai-ii). We next evaluated the models for K-ras activity and measured K-ras-GTP levels in cells by using an active K-ras (K-ras-GTP) specific antibody. All cell models exhibited elevated levels of K-ras-GTP expression (Figure 2, Aiii-iv). Because AKT, NFκB, and MAPK are the well-known downstream targets of activated K-ras, we asked if a K-ras-regulatory mechanism is active in cell models [19]. Models exhibited the expression of active forms of AKT (phosphorylated) and NFκB-p65 (phosphorylated), and MAPK (ERK1/2) indicating an active K-ras signaling in these cells (Figure 2, Bi-ii). The PTEN (tumor suppressor), an antagonist of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3-K)/AKT signaling, has been reported to exhibit functional inactivation and loss of protein expression in PDAC cases [20]. Although testing positive in all murine cell models, the PTEN expression exhibited a gradual loss in human UMPDC progression models (Figure 2Bii), suggesting that progression of localized UM-PDC1 to metastatic UM-PDC2 is associated with the loss of PTEN. It has been reported earlier that PTEN loss is an important event during progression of PDAC from localized disease to metastasis (Figure 2Bii). VEGF is required for tumor cells to sustain their growth by generating new blood vessels around tumors [21]. VEGF expression was detectable in invasive and metastatic murine models (Figure 2Bii). Next, we measured the doubling time, 3D clonogenicity, and invasiveness potential of cells by using Trypan blue dye exclusion, chemoinvasion, and soft-agar clonogenicity assays; data showed that UMPDC-1, UM-PDC2, HI-Panc-L, HI-Panc-I, and HI-Panc-M cells exhibit a doubling time of 48, 36, 48, 36, and 24 hours, respectively (Figure 2Ci). We tested the clonogenic potential of cell lines by soft-agar colony formation assay. In a 14-day duration, all cell lines exhibited clonogenic potential in the order of HI-Panc-M >HI-Panc-I >HI-Panc-L and UM-PDC2>UM-PDC1 (Figure 2Cii). HI-PancM cells exhibited higher invasiveness potential than HI-Panci, whereas HI-PancL exhibited none (Figure 2Ciii). Similarly, UM-PDC2 exhibited more invasive potential than UM-PDC2 (Figure 2Ciii & Supplementary Figure 2Ai). Next, we determined the tumorigenic potential of cell lines in immunocompromised mice model. For testing the tumorigenicity of murine models, tumor cells were subcutaneously implanted in the right flank of female athymic nude mice maintained under sterilized conditions. Animals were followed for weight, tumor growth, and general health on daily basis as per IACUC guidelines. We also tested the tumorigenicity of human UM-PDC model in SCIDmouse model. HI-Panc-I and HI-Panc-M cells exhibited rapid tumor growth than HI-Panc-L cells (Figure 2Di). Human UM-PDC1 and UM-PDC2 cell models formed large-sized tumors within 4-6 weeks postimplantation (Figure 2Di). Notably, the initial rate of tumor growth of HI-Panc-I and HI-Panc-L was almost similar; however, HI-Panc-I group progressed faster than HI-Panc-L after 10 days (Figure 2Dii). Animals exhibiting tumor volume of >1000 mm3 were sacrificed. The harvested tumors were measured for weight. HI-Panc-M and UM-PDC2 cell-derived tumors showed highest volume followed by HI-Panc-I and HI-Panc-L (Figure 2Diii). Taken together, these data establish that all the cell line models are highly tumorigenic when implanted in immunocompromised animals.
Figure 2
Characterization of HI-PancL, HI-PancI, HI-PancM and UM-PDC models. (A) Immunoblot images showing the expression of (Ai-Aii) pancreatic markers (α-Amylase, Pdx1, and PLA2G1B) and (Aiii-Aiv) K-ras activity status in murine (HI-Panc-L, HI-Panc-I, & HI-Panc-M) and human PDAC models (UM-PDC). A known PDAC cell line AsPC1 was used as a reference control. (B) Immunoblot images showing the expression of (Bi-Bii) downstream targets of K-ras pathway (ERK1/2, p38, pAkt, total Akt, pNFκB-p65, total NFκB-p65, VEGF), epithelial markers (E-Cadherin, Cytokeratin-8), and proliferation marker (PCNA) in murine and human PDAC models. (C) Histograms showing the (Ci) cell doubling time (in hour units) n=3 replicates/model; (Cii) 3-dimensional clonogenic potential of HI-Panc-L, HI-Panc-I, HI-Panc-M, and UM-PDC models; (Ciii) invasiveness potential; and (D) the tumorigenic potential of cell models as xenografts in mouse models (Di) photographs showing intact tumors on athymic nude (for murine models) and SCID (for human model) mice. (Dii) Line graph showing the growth of tumors in mice as a function of time to average tumor volume (n=5). (Diii) Graph showing the average weight of tumors formed by cell models when implanted in immunocompromised mice (n=5).
Status of Genomic Stability of Pancreatic Cells During Progressive Stages of PDAC
Genetic instability has long been considered an integral component of humanneoplasia, and solid tumors are nearly all genetically unstable [22]. Aberrations in the number and structure of chromosomes are a hallmark of cells derived from solid tumors [22]. These aberrations include gross chromosomal rearrangements (including translocations, large deletions, or inversions), gene copy number variations (due to defective DNA replication or repair), and anomalous chromosome number (due to defective segregation between daughter cells during cell division) [19 and references therein]. We determined the chromosomal arrangement of murine (Hi-Panc-L, HI-Panc-I, and HI-Panc-M) and human (UM-PDC1 and UM-PDC2) models by performing karyotype analysis on 20 metaphase chromosomes using SKY and conventional G-banding techniques. These analyses revealed an abnormal karyotype for all cell lines with a modal chromosome number of 40, 80, 81, 72, and 72 for Hi-Panc-L, HI-Panc-I, HI-PancM, UMP-DC1, and UM-PDC2, respectively (Supplementary Table 2). In addition to having an abnormal number of chromosomes, sample HI-Panc-L contains a translocation der(16)t(6:16) which consists of a very small portion of chromosome 6 at the distal end of chromosome 16 (Figure 3, Ai-iii). HI-Panc-M cells were shown to contain a deleted copy of chromosome 14. The HI-Panc-I cells exhibited translocations in only one cell analyzed (Figure 3Aii). There was a der(6)t(6:7) translocation which is made up of equal portions of chromosome 6 and chromosome 7 as well as a robertsonian translocation rbt(11:11). HI-Panc-M did not exhibit any chromosomal rearrangement (Figure 3Aiii).
Figure 3
Chromosomal distribution and genomic stability (centrosome segregation & ciliagenesis) during progressive stages of PDAC. (A) Photographs showing the spectral karyotyping analysis of (Ai-iii) murine and (Aiv-v) human models. Images show chromosomal structure, aberrations, and translocations. (B) The centrosome segregation during division of cell models. Photomicrographs showing centrosome segregation during division by gross colocalization of α-tubulin/γ-tubulin in (Bi) HI-Panc and (Bii) UM-PDC cell models using immunofluorescence microscopy. (Biii) Photographs show the single-cell captured images of centrosomes (immunostained with α-tubulin and γ-tubulin) by using fluorescence microscope. (Biv) Histograms showing the average number of centrosomes/cell in HI-PANC and UM-PDAC cell models. The number of centrosomes/cell was counted from maximal projection images of γ-tubulin-labelled cells. (C) Photomicrographs showing the colocalization of Aurora kinase/H2AX in metastatic models using immunofluorescence microscopy. (D) Primary cilia status in murine and human PDAC cell models. (Di) Photomicrographs showing acetylated-α-tubulin (marker of cilia) positive cells as determined by confocal microscopy. (Dii-iii) Histograms showing the quantification of the acetylated-α-tubulin (marker of cilia) positive cells. of cilia) positive cells as determined by confocal microscopy. (E) Immunoblot image showing the expression of acetylated-α-tubulin and HDAC6 in murine and human cell models. The β-actin was used as the loading control in immunoblot analysis.
Chromosomal distribution and genomic stability (centrosome segregation & ciliagenesis) during progressive stages of PDAC. (A) Photographs showing the spectral karyotyping analysis of (Ai-iii) murine and (Aiv-v) human models. Images show chromosomal structure, aberrations, and translocations. (B) The centrosome segregation during division of cell models. Photomicrographs showing centrosome segregation during division by gross colocalization of α-tubulin/γ-tubulin in (Bi) HI-Panc and (Bii) UM-PDC cell models using immunofluorescence microscopy. (Biii) Photographs show the single-cell captured images of centrosomes (immunostained with α-tubulin and γ-tubulin) by using fluorescence microscope. (Biv) Histograms showing the average number of centrosomes/cell in HI-PANC and UM-PDAC cell models. The number of centrosomes/cell was counted from maximal projection images of γ-tubulin-labelled cells. (C) Photomicrographs showing the colocalization of Aurora kinase/H2AX in metastatic models using immunofluorescence microscopy. (D) Primary cilia status in murine and human PDAC cell models. (Di) Photomicrographs showing acetylated-α-tubulin (marker of cilia) positive cells as determined by confocal microscopy. (Dii-iii) Histograms showing the quantification of the acetylated-α-tubulin (marker of cilia) positive cells. of cilia) positive cells as determined by confocal microscopy. (E) Immunoblot image showing the expression of acetylated-α-tubulin and HDAC6 in murine and human cell models. The β-actin was used as the loading control in immunoblot analysis.All the 20 of the metaphase cells analyzed for UM-PDC1 and UM-PDC2 had a hypertriploid karyotype with 72 chromosomes and multiple numerical and structural abnormalities. Relative to a pure triploid karyotype that would have three copies of chromosomes 1 through 22, there was a loss of one copy each of chromosomes 13 and 16, one extra copy of chromosomes 5, 6, 14, and 20, and two extra copies of 8 (Figure 3Aiv). Included among the abnormalities were multiple isochromosomes: two for the short arms of chromosome 5, two each for the long arms of chromosomes 8 and 9, and one for the short arms of chromosome 18. Most notable were the presence of two isochromosomes for 8q, yielding a total of 7 copies of this long arm. Other structural abnormalities included additional material of unknown origin added to the long arms of chromosomes 4, 9, 11, and 12 and to the short arms of chromosomes 14 and 18, and deletions within two of the four copies of chromosome 20. Each of these cells had two X chromosomes present, indicating a loss of a Y (Figure 3Aiv). UMDPC2 differs from UMPDC-1 in having long arm of a chromosome 5 attached to the long arm of chromosome 4; material from the long arm of a chromosome 13 attached to the long arm of one chromosome 9; material from chromosomes X and 20 attached to the long arms of the two isochromosome 9s; abnormal chromosomes 11 and 12, which SKY identified to be composed entirely of 11 and 12, respectively, formed by duplications and/or deletions in the long arm of each chromosome; material from the long arm of a chromosome 16 attached to the long arm of chromosome 14; an isochromosome 14 with material from the long arm of a chromosome 16 attached at both ends; material from the long arm of a chromosome 12 attached to the short arm of one chromosome 18; deletion within two of the four copies of chromosome 20 (Figure 3Av).Defects in chromosome segregation during mitosis contribute to genetic instability during tumorigenesis [23]. One of the known causes of chromosome missegregation in dividing neoplastic cells is the abnormal centrosome number that causes the formation of transient multipolar mitotic spindles [[24], [25], [26], [27]]. Structural and functional centrosome abnormalities are reported in human PDAC [24]. We measured number of centrosomes (in the dividing cells) by performing immunofluorescence-based microscopy analysis of single cells. As represented by microscopy image (Figure 3, Bi-ii) and histogram (Figure 3Biv), we show that both the localized and invasive PDAC cells have an increase in the number of centrosomes/cell. These data suggest that chromosome mis-segregation driven by the presence of supernumenary centrosomes/spindle poles contributes to a silent phenotype (chromosomally instable cells) that reflects the aggressive disease. Interestingly, the metastatic cells (Hi-Panc-M) show a return to the normal centrosome/cell number (Figure 3, Bi-ii). This suggests the intriguing possibility that during clonal selection for the metastatic cells, the abnormal centrosome duplication phenotype becomes suppressed. The result is a highly aggressive yet chromosomally stable clone of tumor cells. We next determined the number of centrosomes (in the dividing cells) in UM-PDC1 and UM-PDC2 by performing immunofluorescence-based microscopy analysis of single cells. As represented by microscopy image (Figure 3Biii) and histogram (Figure 3Bv), we show that both the invasive/metastatic UM-PDC2 have an increase in the number of centrosomes/cell. We also observed the gross colocalization of α-tubulin/γ-tubulin and α-tubulin/E-cadherin in all cell models (Supplementary Figure 2Aii).Phosphorylation is a widely recognized mechanism of regulating chromosome biorientation, tension sensing, and chromosome movement during mitosis [28]. Aurora Kinase A (serine/threonine kinase) is reported to be involved in controlling chromatid segregation in cells [29]. Histone H2AX (a mammalian histone H2A variant) is reported to promote DNA double-strand break repair and undergoes rapid phosphorylation by kinases to form γ-H2AX over large chromatin domains surrounding DNA double-strand breaks [30]. Therefore, Aurora Kinase A and H2AX are used as surrogate biomarkers for the genomic stability of cells. We determined the Aurora Kinase A and H2AX expression levels and localization in cell lines by using confocal microscopy. The fluorescence-immunostaining data show Aurora kinase A localization at outer membrane of dividing cells and H2AX in nuclei of dividing cells (Figure 3C). Notably, the elevated levels of H2AX observed in HI-Panc-M (metastatic cells) suggest that cells at metastatic pancreatic tumor cells undergo a significant DNA damage.Several studies show that centrosome decides the fate of cells (for phenotype) by affecting the assembly of primary cilia in cells [31]. Primary cilia are multisensory organelles expressed in almost every epithelial cell of the body [32]. Recent studies show that the loss of primary cilia in the tumor cells is a common occurrence in solid tumors such as breast, prostate, and kidney [33]. We characterized the expression of cilia in our cell models. Acetylated-α-tubulin is considered a marker of primary cilium in the cells [34]. We used confocal microscopy and Western blot analysis to determine acetylated-α-tubulin status in cell models. As shown in the Figure 3Di, primary cilia expression significantly decreased with increasing disease stage of PDAC models in an order of UM-PDC1>UM-PDC2 and HIPancL>HIPanci>HIPancM (Figure 3, Dii-iii). Recent studies showed that the loss of primary cilia in neoplastic cells as exemplified by the deacetylation of α-tubulin (the structural component of the ciliary axoneme) could be mediated by histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6), a cytoplasmic deacetylase [31]. The deacetylation of α-tubulin induces destabilization of the axoneme and ciliary resorption [35]. By employing immunoblot analysis, we determined the status of HDAC6 expression in progression cell model and found that the HDAC6 expression increased with the aggressiveness of the PDAC stage in an order of UM-PDC1< UM-PDC2 and HI-Panc-L˂ HI-Panc-I˂ HI-Panc-M (Figure 3E). When compared, the expression of HDAC6 was observed to inversely correlate to the levels of acetylated-α-tubulin, suggesting role of HDAC6 in the loss of primary cilia during PDAC development (Figure 3E).
Identifying Hypoxia-Driven Genetic Changes During Progression of PDAC
Hypoxia is a prominent feature in the microenvironment of pancreatic tumors [36]. Therefore, we compared the growth rate of HI-Panc-L, HI-Panc-I, and HI-Panc-M cells upon treatment with CoCl2, which is known to induce HIF1α mimicking a hypoxic state in cancer cells (Figure 4Ai). Aggressive cell proliferation was observed when HI-Panc cell models were grown under hypoxic condition, and HI-Panc-M model registered the highest growth among all models under hypoxia (Figure 4Aii). We repeated the studies using a hypoxia chamber, and the data were similar to CoCl2-induced hypoxia (not shown).
Figure 4
Status of the genetic landscape of tumor cells growing under hypoxic conditions during progression of PDAC disease. (Ai) immunoblot shows the expression of HIF1α (marker of Hypoxia) following induction of hypoxia by Cocl2 treatment. (Aii) Bar graphs shows the relative cell growth in fold units grown in hypoxia and normoxia. (B) RNA-seq analysis of cell models grown under hypoxia conditions. (Bi) Hierarchical clustering of HI-Panc-L, HI-Panc-I, and HI-Panc-M cell models based on gene expression values from RNA-seq data. Heat map represent fold change expression of differentially regulated genes with threshold of ≥2 fold change, P < .05, and FDR value < 1. The red color in the heat map represents fold change >1.5 (upregulated), and green color represents fold change <−1.5 (downregulated). (Bii) Heat map of top 50 genes showing the significant changes (when compared during disease progression). (C) Cells grown under hypoxia were evaluated for genetic changes using RNA sequencing. Histograms show the hypoxia-responsive (Ci) molecular functions and (Cii) biological function changes in PDAC models as determined by Inguinity pathway enrichment analysis of RNA-seq data.
Status of the genetic landscape of tumor cells growing under hypoxic conditions during progression of PDAC disease. (Ai) immunoblot shows the expression of HIF1α (marker of Hypoxia) following induction of hypoxia by Cocl2 treatment. (Aii) Bar graphs shows the relative cell growth in fold units grown in hypoxia and normoxia. (B) RNA-seq analysis of cell models grown under hypoxia conditions. (Bi) Hierarchical clustering of HI-Panc-L, HI-Panc-I, and HI-Panc-M cell models based on gene expression values from RNA-seq data. Heat map represent fold change expression of differentially regulated genes with threshold of ≥2 fold change, P < .05, and FDR value < 1. The red color in the heat map represents fold change >1.5 (upregulated), and green color represents fold change <−1.5 (downregulated). (Bii) Heat map of top 50 genes showing the significant changes (when compared during disease progression). (C) Cells grown under hypoxia were evaluated for genetic changes using RNA sequencing. Histograms show the hypoxia-responsive (Ci) molecular functions and (Cii) biological function changes in PDAC models as determined by Inguinity pathway enrichment analysis of RNA-seq data.To identify key genes underlying the progression of PDAC from localized disease to a metastatic form, we performed whole transcriptome RNA sequencing analysis of murine cell models through paired-end deep sequencing. We performed Kal’s Z-test of FPKM values for measuring comparative gene expression profile. By applying stringent statistical threshold (> or = to 1.5 FC, P < .05), we identified genes differentially expressed in models representative of three different stages of PDAC. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering showed that the HI-Panc-I (invasive) and HI-Panc-M (metastatic) cell lines exhibited comparable expression profile and clustered well separated from HI-Panc-L (localized) cells (Figure 4Bi). Next, we selected a set of 50 genes that could be tested as marker specific for PDAC progression on the basis of expression FC (higher fold change), level of significance (lower p value), and enrichment in pathways (Figure 4Bii). We next conducted the pathway enrichment (ingenuity pathway) analysis of RNA-seq data of hypoxic HI-Panc models using a Qiagen IPA software. The molecular and biological function analysis showed an enrichment in the signal transduction and cell communication pathways in hypoxic environment of tumor cells (Figure 4, Ci-iv). For the validity in biological replicates, a quantitative qPCR validation was performed for randomly selected genes in murine and human cell models grown under hypoxia. We observed significant changes in the expression of ISX, CLCA4, SLC5A8, TEX11, CRABP1, CLC12, and BGN1 genes under hypoxic conditions during PDAC progression (Figure 5, Ai-iv).
Figure 5
The pathway and GSEA analysis of tumor cells growing under hypoxic conditions during progression of PDAC disease. (A-Aiii) Bar graphs showing the qRT-PCR validation of five genes (ISX, CLCA4, SLC5A8, BGN1, TEX11) selected from RNA-seq data analysis. (Bi-ii) GSEA enrichment plot of HI-PANC cell model showing the negative enrichment of tumor suppressor genes with ISX gene. The top panel of the figure plots the enrichment scores (ES) for each gene, whereas the bottom panel of the plot shows the value of the ranking metric moving down the list of ranked genes. (Bii) The table enumerates the top tumor suppressor genes showing negative enrichment with ISX gene. (Ci-ii) GSEA enrichment plot of HI-PANC cell model showing the negative enrichment of negative regulators of M2 macrophages genes with ISX gene. (Cii) The table enumerates the top negative regulators of M2 macrophages gene with ISX gene.
The pathway and GSEA analysis of tumor cells growing under hypoxic conditions during progression of PDAC disease. (A-Aiii) Bar graphs showing the qRT-PCR validation of five genes (ISX, CLCA4, SLC5A8, BGN1, TEX11) selected from RNA-seq data analysis. (Bi-ii) GSEA enrichment plot of HI-PANC cell model showing the negative enrichment of tumor suppressor genes with ISX gene. The top panel of the figure plots the enrichment scores (ES) for each gene, whereas the bottom panel of the plot shows the value of the ranking metric moving down the list of ranked genes. (Bii) The table enumerates the top tumor suppressor genes showing negative enrichment with ISX gene. (Ci-ii) GSEA enrichment plot of HI-PANC cell model showing the negative enrichment of negative regulators of M2 macrophages genes with ISX gene. (Cii) The table enumerates the top negative regulators of M2 macrophages gene with ISX gene.Pancreas plays a significant role in metabolism and metabolic diseases in humans. Patients with metabolic diseases have been reported to be at high risk of developing PDAC [37]. Notably, among the all members of the hypoxia-responsive gene set (ISX, CLCA4, SLC5A8, TEX11, CRABP1, CLC12, and BGN1), Intestinal Specific homeobox protein (ISX) is the prominant factor that is reported to be involved in metabolic activities and disorders in humans. ISX has been reported to regulate the metabolic flux and immune system [38]. This generated an interest to study the relevance and function of ISX in PDAC disease. To extract additional information from the whole transcriptome changes occurring during the progression of localized PDAC to metastatic PDAC, the complete gene expression dataset was submitted to GSEA with respect to ISX-positive PDAC [16,39]. The ISX oncogene was found to exhibit a positive enrichment score in RNA-seq data of hypoxic-tumor cell models. Critical pathways for the ISX-relevant gene sets obtained were identified to be associated with mitosis, apoptosis, oncogenes, tumor suppressor expression, inflammation, nonclassical M2-activated macrophages, transcription, and RNA polymerase II (RNA pol II) transcription factor activity. The M2-activated macrophages gene set showed negative enrichment (enrichment score −0.46) in ISX-positive tumors (ISX rank metric score = 2.749, running ES ISX = 0.0429, FDR q value = 0.00614) (Figure 5Aiii). This indicates that hypoxic pancreatic tumor cells of advanced disease stage have an enrichment of M2-polarized macrophages gene set. Notably, M2 polarized macrophages are known to play role during tumor progression. Further, RNA pol II gene set showed negative enrichment (enrichment score −0.36042485) in ISX-positive tumors (ISX rank metric score = 2.749, FDR q value ≤ 0.001) (Figure 5Ci). RNA pol II gene set contains a number of tumor suppressor genes such as PITX1, EGR1, EGR2, HEY1, BAFT2 KLF12, and GATA2 which we found to have a negative enrichment in metastatic cell model (Hi-Pancm) (Figure 5Cii). We postulate that the reason ISX oncogene might be associated to the downregulation of RNA-pol II–enriched tumor suppressor gene set.
ISX Expression in PDAC Models
The RNA sequencing and validation by qRT-PCR data showed that ISX exhibits a marked increase in its expression during the PDAC progression (Figure 4). ISX belongs to a homeo domains containing transcription factors family which is associated with inflammation, cell growth, differentiation, and morphogenesis [40,41]. Using immunoblotting, we determined the ISX protein levels in murineHi-PancM and human UM-PDC cell models. ISX protein levels were to found to be higher in metastatic (HI-PancM, ASPC1) than in primary PDAC cells (PancL, UMPDC1) (Figure 6A). We next performed IHC analysis and confirmed the presence of ISX protein in PDAC tumors (Figure 6B). When compared, the adenocarcinoma tumors exhibited higher levels of ISX levels than in normal pancreas. Notably, ISX protein was also observed in hyperplasia regions (HG-PanIN regions) of NAT (normal-associated tumors) specimens.
Figure 6
ISX as a progression biomarker and regulator of metastasis process in PDAC disease.
(A) Immunoblot image showing the expression of ISX protein in murine and human cell models. The β-actin was used as the loading control in immunoblot analysis. (B) Photomicrograph showing the expression of ISX (as pointed by arrows) in pancreatic tumor specimens of PDAC patients as determined by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. (C) Association of ISX to PDAC disease phenotype and survival analysis in patients. (Ci) Box-plots show the copy number of ISX gene in PDAC patient speciemns from the analysis of oncomine database. (Cii) The line graph shows the Kaplan-Meier analysis for the survival probability of PDAC male and female patients exhibiting varied ISX expression. (Di) Histogram showing the effect of ISX suppression on (Bi) cell migration (scratch wound assay) and (Dii) invasiveness potential (chemoinvasion assay) of metastatic cell models (HI-PancM and AsPC1) grown under either hypoxia or normoxia. Control cells were transfected with scrambled siRNA. Test group of cells were transfected with ISX-specific siRNA (150 nM). (E) The regulation of MMP2, VEGF, and NFκB by ISX in PDAC models as determined by luciferase-based reporter assays. (Ei-ii) Histograms showing the MMP2 promoter activity, (Ei-ii) histograms showing the VEGF promoter activity, and (Ev-vi) histograms showing the transcriptional activity of NFκB (NFκB-responsive element) activity in metastatic cells grown under either hypoxia or normoxia conditions (HI-PancM and UMPDC2). (F) Histograms showing the effect of ISX-suppression on the cell cycle (at Sub-G0/G1, G1 and G2/M stages) distribution of metastatic ASPC1 growing under either (Fi) hypoxia or (Fii) normoxia conditions.
ISX as a progression biomarker and regulator of metastasis process in PDAC disease.(A) Immunoblot image showing the expression of ISX protein in murine and human cell models. The β-actin was used as the loading control in immunoblot analysis. (B) Photomicrograph showing the expression of ISX (as pointed by arrows) in pancreatic tumor specimens of PDAC patients as determined by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis. (C) Association of ISX to PDAC disease phenotype and survival analysis in patients. (Ci) Box-plots show the copy number of ISX gene in PDAC patient speciemns from the analysis of oncomine database. (Cii) The line graph shows the Kaplan-Meier analysis for the survival probability of PDAC male and female patients exhibiting varied ISX expression. (Di) Histogram showing the effect of ISX suppression on (Bi) cell migration (scratch wound assay) and (Dii) invasiveness potential (chemoinvasion assay) of metastatic cell models (HI-PancM and AsPC1) grown under either hypoxia or normoxia. Control cells were transfected with scrambled siRNA. Test group of cells were transfected with ISX-specific siRNA (150 nM). (E) The regulation of MMP2, VEGF, and NFκB by ISX in PDAC models as determined by luciferase-based reporter assays. (Ei-ii) Histograms showing the MMP2 promoter activity, (Ei-ii) histograms showing the VEGF promoter activity, and (Ev-vi) histograms showing the transcriptional activity of NFκB (NFκB-responsive element) activity in metastatic cells grown under either hypoxia or normoxia conditions (HI-PancM and UMPDC2). (F) Histograms showing the effect of ISX-suppression on the cell cycle (at Sub-G0/G1, G1 and G2/M stages) distribution of metastatic ASPC1 growing under either (Fi) hypoxia or (Fii) normoxia conditions.
Association Analysis: TCGA-PAAD Clinical Study in Patients
We performed the data mining to identify the status of ISX expression in large cohort of PDAC patients using oncomine data sets. Using the oncomine database [42], we analyzed TCGA data 2013 (case n=100) and found that PDAC cases exhibited higher copy number of ISX than other types of pancreatic diseases in humans (Figure 6Ci). We next determined whether ISX expression accurately and independently determines survival of PDAC patients taking into account tumor grade, sex, and age. This was performed on the PAAD-TCGA dataset. The patient specimens were distributed on the basis of expression level (ISX-low/medium, ISX-high) and gender (male and female) subgroups. The high- and low-expression groups were formed based on the cutoff median level of ISX expression. We compared approximately equal size of male (n=20) and female (n=25) patients exhibiting high expression of ISX. The Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival of TCGA-PAAD data set showed that ISX-high female patients (n=25) exhibit a significant (P = .034) and negative correlation to the survival than male counterparts (n=20) (Figure 6Cii). We found that female patients harboring high ISX expression exhibit the least survival.We also compared relevance of survival in low–ISX expression to high-expression patients. We compared low-expression (n=55) and high-expression (n=25) ISX in survival of female patients. When plotted for survival, the difference looks apparent, i.e., low–ISX expression group showed more survival (>2000 days) than high–ISX expression group (<500 days); however, the statistical P value (P=.08) is lower than our high stringent cutoff value of P<.05 for statistical significance. Therefore, this data set was deemed as insufficient, which could be due to a large difference in patient numbers between the two groups. We suggest that a comparative study of low ISX expression to high ISX expression with reference to survival should be conducted in a large cohort of approximately equal number for patients (low ISX expression vs high ISX expression).
Relevance of ISX in PDAC Metastasis
Metastasis is a complex process and includes steps such as loosening of tumor cells from the primary tumor, migration of tumor cells through the tumor tissue, crossing of endothelium membrane, intravasation/extravasation of tumor cells through blood vessels, traveling to distant sites, and homing at distant sites/metastatic sites to form secondary tumors. Migration of tumor cells is an important step for the metastasis multistep process. We determined the relevance of ISX on the migratory potential of tumor cells grown under normoxia and hypoxia conditions employing using a scratch wound-healing assay as described previously [43]. For this purpose, ISX expression was suppressed by siRNA in HI-Panc-M UM-PDC-2 and AsPC1 cells grown under hypoxia conditions. We evaluated the impact of ISX-suppression on the i) migration and ii) invasiveness potential of PDAC cells by using scratch wound-healing and chemoinvasion assays, respectively. The gap generated (due to scratch) in the center of the cell monolayer is akin to a wound which would be filled by migratory cells and the wound closure was measured at different time points (12, 24, and 36 hours postscratch) under microscope. ISX suppression was observed to significantly (P<.05) delay the migration of tumor cells under normoxia as well as hypoxia conditions; however, the effect of ISX suppression was noted remarkable in hypoxic cells (Figure 6Di & Supplementary Figure 2B). We next determined the relevance of ISX in the invasiveness potential of metastatic cells by employing a chemoinvasion assay and observed that ISX suppression causes a significant (P<.05) inhibition (>90%) in the invasiveness potential of human and murine metastatic cells (Figure 6, Di-ii & Supplementary Figure 2C).Degradation of extracellular matrix in the host tissues is required by tumor cells for metastasis, and proteases (such as matrix metalloproteases; MMP) are critical for this process. MMP2 plays a role in the metastasis of pancreatic tumor cells in humanpatients [44,45]. By employing a luciferase reporter assay, we determined the activation of MMP2 gene and observed that suppression of ISX significantly (P<.05) decreases the promoter activity of MMP2 in human and murine metastatic PDAC cells (Figure 6, Ei-ii). These data were also validated in known metastatic cell model ASPC1 (Supplementary Figure 2, Di-iii).VEGF activation is reported to be correlated to the metastasis and poor prognosis in PDAC patients [46]. We observed that the suppression of ISX causes a significant (P<.05) decrease in the VEGF promoter activity in human and murine metastatic PDAC cell models (Figure 6, Eii-iv). MMP2 and VEGF activation is reported to be associated with the activation of NFκB, and the role of NFκB in the progression of PDAC is well established [47]. We next evaluated if a possible link between ISX and NFκB activity exists in PDAC models. Notably, we found that the suppression of ISX causes a significant inhibition in the transcriptional activity of N in cell human and murine metastatic PDAC cell models grown under either conditions of normoxia and hypoxia (Figure 6, Ev-vi). Taken together, our data suggest a positive association between ISX and the activation of NFκB/MMP2/VEGF molecular network in PDAC cells. These data were also validated in ASPC1 cells (Supplementary Figure 2, Di-iii). Finally, we investigated if ISX status has a bearing on the proliferation and cell cycle of metastatic cells using a flow cytometry (FACS) assay. Under normoxia conditions, ISX suppression did not cause significant change in cell cycle profile (G1, G2 phases); however, it caused an increase in sub-G1 population of human cells (Supplementary Figure 3, A-B). Notably, suppression of ISX was observed to cause an increase in Sub-G0/G1 and G2/M population of cells growing under hypoxia compared to control cells (Figure 6, Fi-ii and Supplementary Figure 3, Ci-ii). To summarize, these data identify ISX molecule playing a key role in the hypoxia-induced metastasis process in PDAC disease.
Discussion
The activating point mutation of the K-ras oncogene on codon-12 accounts for 70%-95% of PDAC cases and 71%-75% of pancreatic cancer specimens [19,48]. The K-ras oncogene encodes for a small GTPase that acts as a molecular switch by coupling cell membrane growth factor receptors to intracellular signaling pathways to control various cellular processes. The point mutation of K-ras impairs intrinsic GTPase activity of RAS and prevents conversion of GTP (active) to GDP (inactive). P21 RAS is thus permanently bound to GTP and activates downstream signaling pathways, such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR, RAF, or MEK/ERK [19,48]. K-ras/Pdx mice develop only the precursor PanIN lesions. An important observation in this study is that pancreatic adenocarcinoma in K-ras/Pdx/p16mice seemed to be more aggressive than the observations reported by of Aguirre et al. [10]. This is supported by our findings of I) overt liver metastatic tumors, II) sarcomas in the liver, and III) vimentin-positive sarcomas in pancreatic tissue in K-ras/Pdx/p16mouse model. Nevertheless, the majority of tumors formed were identified to be PDAC. We surmise that the pancreatic lesions are metastatic from the pancreas as well, which indicates that these stromal-originated pancreatic sarcomas are also very malignant. The noticeable observation in this study is that we generated cell models (HIPancl, HIPanci, HIPancm) from K-ras/Pdx/p16mouse model which exhibits various different phenotypes and three different stages of PDAC progression. Importantly, each comes from mice with an identical genetic background; therefore, the differences in molecular/cellular landscape are due to PDAC progression, not differences in driver mutations.The activating K-ras mutation promotes persistent signaling to downstream effectors molecules which in turn results in enhanced stimulation of proliferative pathways such as PI3K/AKT, the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and NFκB, thus conferring a growth advantage to the cancer cells [19]. Akt activation has been reported to correlate with worse prognosis in PDAC patients [49]. NFκB is reported to be constitutively activated in 70% of PDAC cases [49]. Our models rightly capture these two important molecular events (of NFκB and Akt activation) during the PDAC disease progression. However, the noticeable observation in our study is that no activation of either Akt or NFκB was found in model representing localized PDAC, whereas it was remarkable in models representing invasive and metastatic stages of disease. This observation is clinically significant because it identifies an accurate stage of disease suitable for therapies targeting NFκB or Akt pathways to treat PDAC. This observation also could be an explanation for the failure of AKT or NFκB-targeting therapies in patients receiving the therapies irrespective of disease stage. However, it is to be noted that these observations are relevant to the patients exhibiting K-ras and as INK4A/p16 aberrations. Genomic instability is an important molecular event for acquiring of a particular phenotypes by neoplastic cells during the progression of disease [50]. Campbell et al. reported that genomic instability that frequently persists after cancer dissemination is required for pancreatic primary tumor cells to acquire divergent phenotypes during progression of disease [51]. One of the major cell organelles that is reported to contribute to the genomic stability (by forming bipolar spindles and segregating chromosomes) in neoplastic cells is the centrosome [22,23]. It was Theodor Boveri almost 100 years ago who suggested that extra centrosomes would lead to multipolar cell divisions, resulting in genetic instability and malignant transformation [52]. Numerous studies show that the centrosome amplification correlates with high-grade tumors and poor prognosis [49]. Notably, some reports have shown that centrosome amplification was detectable in some early low-grade lesions, giving weight to the argument that centrosome amplification could drive tumorigenesis [[51], [52], [53]]. We observed a remarkable change in the centrosome numbers in PDAC cell models representing different stages of PDAC. Our study supports the notion that occurrence of a change in centrosome number during progressive stages of PDAC could be a driver for the development of aggressive PDAC phenotype via the formation of transient multipolar mitotic spindles. Another factor that has emerged as an important contributor to the genomic instability is the cilia [31]. Cilia serve as a cellular “antenna” that transmits an indispensable signaling pathways in the cell. Loss of cilia is commonly observed during the progression of large number of cancers. As is the case with many cancers, primary cilia are absent from the majority of human PanIN and PDAC lesions. Our murine and human PDAC model faithfully recapitulates the reported clinical condition showing the gradual loss of primary cilia with the progression of disease from localized to metastatic phenotype.One of the key factors that correlates with poor survival of patients with PDAC is the extent of hypoxic areas within the tumor tissue [54]. The adaptation of pancreatic tumor cells to deficient oxygen to tumor tissues is reported to promote the induction of an invasive and treatment-resistant phenotype, thus triggering metastases at an early stage of tumor development [54]. Notably, the growth pattern and aggressive behavior of HI-Panc-L, HI-Panc-I, HI-Panc-M, and UM-PDC models under hypoxia conditions match the clinical condition in PDAC patients who exhibit a quick progression of disease after diagnosis. Therefore, it is desirable that therapies be identified which perform better under hypoxic conditions and that biomarker signatures be identified which are detectable under hypoxic conditions. This would require progression models which are of same genetic background and grow under similar hypoxic conditions.We performed RNA sequencing of progression models grown under hypoxic conditions and identified important genetic changes occurring within hypoxia tumor cells at different stages of PDAC disease. We identified several genes which either showed i) a consistent change in expression during the progressive stages of PDAC from localized to metastatic or ii) a significant change only at one certain stage of disease. The significance of this study is that using RNA sequencing information, we identified ISX as a hypoxia-responsive gene that plays an important role in the invasiveness of metastatic PDAC cells [8]. ISX (aliases Pix1, RAXLX, intestine specific homeobox) belongs to homeobox family and is a transcription factor involved in early embryonic development. The string analysis (10.5.string version) shows that ISX transcriptional factor forms a close network with homeobox proteins (LDB1, LDB2, LEUTX, LHX3, LHX4). ISX is reported to regulate high-density lipoprotein receptor and cholesterol transporter scavenger receptor in the intestines of mice [37,55,56]. Hsu et al. and Wang et al. reported that ISX factor induces the inflammation, binds to the promoter region of cyclin D1, and induces the expression of E2F1 in liver cells [56].An important observation of this study is that ISX-positive hypoxic PDAC tumor cells harbor enriched M2 macrophages related gene set. It is to be noted that M2-polarized macrophages are known i) to promote cancer progression and ii) be responsive to IL-6 cytokine. Based on the integrated genomic data and GSEA of hypoxic models, it is speculated that enrichment of ISX (resulting in modulation of tumor suppressors and M2-macrophage pathway) under hypoxic conditions could be an underlying mechanism for metastatic progression of PDAC in patients. Therefore, we suggest that ISX-GSEA molecular signature has a potential to be developed as a PDAC progression biomarker. However, this warrants further investigation in clinical settings. The significance of ISX contributing to metastasis progression in PDAC could be ascertained from our data showing i) the dependence of metastatic genes VEGF, MMP2, and NFκB on the expression of ISX in tumor cells and ii) TCGA clinical data showing a positive correlation of ISX copy number to the high-grade metastatic PDAC.Because targeting of ISX caused an inhibition in the transcription of metastatic genes, we suggest that ISX could be exploited as a therapeutic target for treating metastatic PDAC. Our data open an opportunity to target ISX by potential therapies such as small molecule inhibitors, peptides, and chimeric RNA. Efforts are under way (in our laboratory) to identify the small molecule inhibitors of ISX. To summarize, this study i) provides a novel tool to study the PDAC disease and test future therapies and ii) identifies ISX as a progression biomarker as well as therapeutic target for PDAC in humans.The following are the supplementary data related to this article.
Supplementary Figure 1
(A) Genotyping of transgenic mice and the primer conditions for K-ras mutant mice, Ink4a/Arf null (p16 null mouse), and Insulin promoter factor 1 (Ipf1, Pdx1)(Pdx1-cre) cre- mouse. (B-D) Images showing the transgene expression of (B)K-ras, (C)PDX, and (D) ink4a/p16 as evaluated on a DNA agarose gel. 1.0-kb ladder was used as a marker.
Supplementary Figure 2
(Ai) Photomicrographs show the invasiveness potential of UM-PDC1 and UM-PDC2 as determined by chemoinvasion assay. (Aii) Microphotograph shows the colocalization of λtubulin/E-Cadherin proteins in murine PDAC cell models as determined by fluorescence microscope. (Aiii) Histogram shows efficacy of siRNA in suppressing the ISX expression in H-PancM model grown under either hypoxia or normoxia. (Bi-iii) Photomicrographs show the efficacy of ISX suppression (by siRNA) on the migration potential of UMPDC, HIPancM, and ASPCI cells (under hypoxia or normoxia) as determined by a time-course– microscopyof cells. (C) Photomicrographs show the efficacy of ISX suppression (by siRNA) on the invasiveness potential of UMPDC, HIPanc, and ASPCI cells (under hypoxia or normoxia) as determined by chemoinvasion assay. (D) Histograms showing the (Di)MMP2 promoter activity, (Dii)VEGF promoter activity, and (Diii) transcriptional activity of NFκB (NFκB-responsive element) activity in metastatic ASPC1 cells grown under either hypoxia or normoxia conditions.
Supplementary Figure 3
Histograms and line graphs showing the effect of ISX suppression on the cell cycle (at sub-G0/G1, G1, and G2/M stages) distribution of metastatic (A) ASPC1 and (B) HIPancM cells growing under normoxia conditions. Histograms showing the effect of ISX suppression on the cell cycle (at sub-G0/G1, G1, and G2/M stages) distribution of metastatic (Ci-ii) ASPC1 and (Di-ii) HIPancM cells growing under hypoxia conditions.Supplementary material
Authors: Ben Z Stanger; Bangyan Stiles; Gregory Y Lauwers; Nabeel Bardeesy; Michael Mendoza; Ying Wang; Amy Greenwood; Kuang-hung Cheng; Margaret McLaughlin; Dennis Brown; Ronald A Depinho; Hong Wu; Douglas A Melton; Yuval Dor Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Aravind Subramanian; Pablo Tamayo; Vamsi K Mootha; Sayan Mukherjee; Benjamin L Ebert; Michael A Gillette; Amanda Paulovich; Scott L Pomeroy; Todd R Golub; Eric S Lander; Jill P Mesirov Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christopher H Crane; James L Abbruzzese; Douglas B Evans; Robert A Wolff; Mathew T Ballo; Marc Delclos; Luka Milas; K Mason; C Charnsangavej; P W T Pisters; J E Lee; R Lenzi; J N Vauthey; A B S Wong; T Phan; Q Nguyen; N A Janjan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-04-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Andrew J Aguirre; Nabeel Bardeesy; Manisha Sinha; Lyle Lopez; David A Tuveson; James Horner; Mark S Redston; Ronald A DePinho Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2003-12-17 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Sunil R Hingorani; Emanuel F Petricoin; Anirban Maitra; Vinodh Rajapakse; Catrina King; Michael A Jacobetz; Sally Ross; Thomas P Conrads; Timothy D Veenstra; Ben A Hitt; Yoshiya Kawaguchi; Don Johann; Lance A Liotta; Howard C Crawford; Mary E Putt; Tyler Jacks; Christopher V E Wright; Ralph H Hruban; Andrew M Lowy; David A Tuveson Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Vamsi K Mootha; Cecilia M Lindgren; Karl-Fredrik Eriksson; Aravind Subramanian; Smita Sihag; Joseph Lehar; Pere Puigserver; Emma Carlsson; Martin Ridderstråle; Esa Laurila; Nicholas Houstis; Mark J Daly; Nick Patterson; Jill P Mesirov; Todd R Golub; Pablo Tamayo; Bruce Spiegelman; Eric S Lander; Joel N Hirschhorn; David Altshuler; Leif C Groop Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 38.330