Literature DB >> 31172614

CDK4, CDK6, cyclin D1 and Notch1 immunocytochemical expression of oral brush liquid-based cytology for the diagnosis of oral leukoplakia and oral cancer.

Omar Kujan1, Gareth Huang1, Ashwati Ravindran1, Monisha Vijayan1, Camile S Farah1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using oral liquid-based brush cytology (OLBC) coupled with immunocytochemistry as a minimally invasive approach to stratify the cancer risk in patients with oral leukoplakia.
METHODS: Fifty-five patients diagnosed with either oral leukoplakia (OLK) or oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) were recruited. All patients underwent oral brush biopsy followed by surgical biopsy. 275 liquid-based cytology preparations were made. Pap-stained OLBC slides were assessed using the modified 2014 Bethesda Cytology system. The expression of CDK4, CDK6, cyclin D1, and Notch 1 was immunocytochemically analysed and compared against the histopathological diagnosis. A combined index score of OLBC grading and protein expression was calculated.
RESULTS: A significant association was found between the definitive histopathological diagnosis and the cytological interpretation (P = 0.0005). The index scores of CDK4, CDK6, and cyclin D1 were significantly associated with the development of disease from non-dysplastic epithelium to OSCC. No significant association was observed between the Notch 1 index score and disease stage. The diagnostic accuracy of OLBC showed the highest values of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy: 84.6%, 70.4%, 73.3%, 82.6%, and 78.8%, respectively, compared with the cumulative protein index, CDK4/6 index, and the combined OLBC grading and CDK4/6 index.
CONCLUSION: This study has also demonstrated the efficacy of the use of OLBC in the detection of OED and OSCC, and showed that the use of CDK4, CDK6, cyclin D1, and Notch 1 immunocytochemistry failed to improve the diagnostic accuracy of OLBC suggesting they are not useful in the early detection of OSCC.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; cyclin-dependent kinases; liquid-based cytology; oral cancer; oral potentially malignant disorders; oral squamous cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31172614     DOI: 10.1111/jop.12902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med        ISSN: 0904-2512            Impact factor:   4.253


  10 in total

1.  PTHLH Predicts the Prognosis of Patients with Oral Leukoplakia.

Authors:  Zhongjing Lv; Rong Cong; Jiafeng Li; Kun Cao; Qiang Bao; Linlin Li; Feng Yang; Jian Yuan
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Silencing of LncRNA SNHG16 Downregulates Cyclin D1 (CCND1) to Abrogate Malignant Phenotypes in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) Through Upregulating miR-17-5p.

Authors:  Qiuling Wang; Jingxin Han; Pu Xu; Xinchun Jian; Xieshan Huang; Deyu Liu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Mutational Characterization and Potential Prognostic Biomarkers of Chinese Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Nan Zhang; Junping Shi; Xiaoliang Shi; Wenting Chen; Junfeng Liu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Multifunctional photodynamic/photothermal nano-agents for the treatment of oral leukoplakia.

Authors:  Lin Lin; Chuanhui Song; Zheng Wei; Huihui Zou; Shengwei Han; Zichen Cao; Xinyu Zhang; Guorong Zhang; Jianchuan Ran; Yu Cai; Wei Han
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 10.435

Review 5.  Proliferation and Apoptosis Pathways and Factors in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Steven He; Rajdeep Chakraborty; Shoba Ranganathan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Clinicopathologic factors influencing the screening accuracy of oral cytology: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Masami Kawaharada; Satoshi Maruyama; Manabu Yamazaki; Tatsuya Abé; Nyein Nyein Chan; Akinori Funayama; Atsushi Uenoyama; Toshiyuki Akimori; Kei Tomihara; Jun-Ichi Tanuma
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 3.111

Review 7.  A Systematic Review of Oral Biopsies, Sample Types, and Detection Techniques Applied in Relation to Oral Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Guanghuan Yang; Luqi Wei; Benjamin K S Thong; Yuanyuan Fu; Io Hong Cheong; Zisis Kozlakidis; Xue Li; Hui Wang; Xiaoguang Li
Journal:  BioTech (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-02

8.  Immunoexpression of oral brush biopsy enhances the accuracy of diagnosis for oral lichen planus and lichenoid lesions.

Authors:  Majdy Idrees; Kate Shearston; Camile S Farah; Omar Kujan
Journal:  J Oral Pathol Med       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.539

9.  The upregulation of oncogenic miRNAs in swabbed samples obtained from oral premalignant and malignant lesions.

Authors:  Shu-Chun Lin; Chung-Ji Liu; Si-Hua Ji; Wan-Wen Hung; Ying-Chieh Liu; Sih-Rou Chang; Hsi-Feng Tu; Kuo-Wei Chang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.606

10.  Novel cytological model for the identification of early oral cancer diagnostic markers: The carcinoma sequence model.

Authors:  Masami Kawaharada; Manabu Yamazaki; Satoshi Maruyama; Tatsuya AbÉ; Nyein Nyein Chan; Taiichi Kitano; Tadaharu Kobayashi; Takeyasu Maeda; Jun-Ichi Tanuma
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.967

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.