| Literature DB >> 31171978 |
Dessie Abebaw1, Rahma Ali2, Afework Tadele2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Contraception is a good indicator of the extent to which couples have access to reproductive health services. Survey data on unmet need can provide overall direction by helping to pinpoint the obstacles in society and weaknesses in services that need to be overcome. This study is significant as it provides strong policy recommendations for the design and implementation of economic and non-economic interventions into family planning utilization by all eligible women.Entities:
Keywords: Ethiopia; Family planning; PMA2020; Unmet need
Year: 2019 PMID: 31171978 PMCID: PMC6547515 DOI: 10.1186/s40834-019-0087-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contracept Reprod Med ISSN: 2055-7426
Socio demographic characteristics of women of reproductive age in Ethiopia, 2017
| Variables | categories | Weighted Percentage of sample | Weighted number | Unweighted number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 15–19 | 23.6 | 1771 | 1735 |
| 20–24 | 17.5 | 1308 | 1449 | |
| 25–29 | 18.2 | 1368 | 1447 | |
| 30–34 | 14.0 | 1053 | 1008 | |
| 35–39 | 11.6 | 871 | 824 | |
| 40–44 | 8.2 | 612 | 562 | |
| 45–49 | 6.8 | 512 | 456 | |
| Marital status | Married | 62.3 | 4671 | 4224 |
| Living together | 1.5 | 112 | 122 | |
| Divorced | 6.9 | 515 | 590 | |
| Widowed | 2.7 | 200 | 190 | |
| Never married | 26.6 | 1994 | 2351 | |
| Parity | Nonea | 32.8 | 2461 | 2827 |
| 1–2 | 23.8 | 1784 | 2019 | |
| 3–4 | 16.1 | 1209 | 1151 | |
| 5 or more | 27.2 | 2039 | 1480 | |
| Education | Never attended | 41.6 | 3118 | 2443 |
| Primary | 38.5 | 2885 | 2692 | |
| Secondary | 15.6 | 1168 | 1683 | |
| Technical/Vocational | 2.7 | 202 | 393 | |
| University | 1.5 | 116 | 26 | |
| Wealth quintile | Lowest | 19.3 | 1449 | 923 |
| Lower | 19.3 | 1445 | 963 | |
| Middle | 19.2 | 1440 | 972 | |
| Higher | 19.6 | 1471 | 1253 | |
| Highest | 22.6 | 1690 | 3370 | |
| Region | Addis | 5.0 | 378 | 891 |
| Amhara | 22.7 | 1702 | 1285 | |
| Oromiya | 38.4 | 2877 | 1736 | |
| SNNP | 22.4 | 1681 | 1594 | |
| Tigray | 6.7 | 499 | 1134 | |
| Other | 4.8 | 357 | 841 | |
|
|
|
|
|
astands for those never gave birth
Fig. 1Regional status of all woman of reproductive age Unmet Need for family planning, in Ethiopia, 2017
Fig. 2Reasons for non-use of contraception among women’s of reproductive age group in Ethiopia, 2017
Multivariate logistic regression model of unmet need for family planning in Ethiopia in 2017
| Variables | Unmet need for family planning | COR (CI 95%) | AOR (CI 95%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes (%) | No (%) | |||
| Agea | 1217(16.2) | 6277(83.8) | 1.02(1.01–1.03)** |
|
| Final decision | ||||
| You alone | 70(43.5) | 930 (39.8) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Provider | 0.21(0.1) | 63(2.7) | 0.04 (0.01–0.33)* | 0.08 (0.006–1.2) |
| Partner | 15(9.3) | 222(9.5) | 0.86(0.36–2.01) | 1.20(0.30–4.0) |
| You and provider | 5(3.1) | 110(4.7) | 0.60(0.09–9.95) |
|
| You and partner | 71(44.1) | 1009(43.2) | 0.93(0.60–1.40) | 1.98(0.95–4.12) |
| Number of children at first use a | 1217(16.2) | 6277(83.8) | 1.05(1.01–1.09)* |
|
| Wealth quintile | ||||
| Lowest | 349(28.6) | 1099 (17.5) | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Lower | 284(23.3) | 1161(18.5) | 0.76 (0.59–0.98)* |
|
| Middle | 268(22.0) | 1172(18.6) | 0.72 (0.55–0.92)* | 0.580(0.20–1.89) |
| Higher | 203(16.7) | 1268(20.2) | 0.50 (0.38–0.65)** | 0.57(.20–1.90) |
| Highest | 113(9.3) | 1577(25.1) | 0.22 (0.17–0.29)** | 0.89(0.18–4.20) |
| Parity a | 1217(16.2) | 6277(83.8) | 1.92(1.79–2.06)** |
|
aContinuous variable,*Statistically significant at P-value < 0.05, ** statistically significant at P-value < 0.001, COR crude odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio, 1.0 reference category. NB frequencies were weighted