| Literature DB >> 32442230 |
Raisul Akram1, Abdur Razzaque Sarker1, Nurnabi Sheikh2, Nausad Ali1, Mgn Mozumder1, Marufa Sultana3,4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Along with the developing world, Bangladesh has made a tremendous improvement in declining total fertility rate, however, this declining trend is not uniform to all the socio-demographic stratum. Incongruities exist between the numbers of children that women bearing and what they actually desired which refers to unmet fertility desire. This study aims to elicit women's perception of ideal number of children and predictors of unmet fertility desire in Bangladesh.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32442230 PMCID: PMC7244139 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233634
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Percentage distribution of study participants by demographic and empowerment characteristics (n = 10,912).
| Characteristics of Sample | Percentage (%) (n = 10,912) | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27.04 | 26.22 | 27.89 | |
| 72.96 | 72.11 | 73.78 | |
| 12.63 | 12.02 | 13.27 | |
| 6.26 | 5.82 | 6.73 | |
| 17.36 | 16.66 | 18.08 | |
| 33.75 | 32.87 | 34.64 | |
| 11.13 | 10.56 | 11.74 | |
| 12.41 | 11.80 | 13.04 | |
| 6.46 | 6.01 | 6.94 | |
| 19.95 | 19.21 | 20.71 | |
| 20.13 | 19.38 | 20.89 | |
| 19.91 | 19.17 | 20.67 | |
| 20.09 | 19.35 | 20.85 | |
| 19.93 | 19.19 | 20.69 | |
| 89.06 | 88.46 | 89.63 | |
| 9.09 | 8.56 | 9.64 | |
| 1.86 | 1.62 | 2.13 | |
| 1.87 | 1.63 | 2.14 | |
| 9.90 | 9.36 | 10.48 | |
| 18.61 | 17.89 | 19.35 | |
| 22.41 | 21.64 | 23.21 | |
| 18.06 | 17.34 | 18.79 | |
| 16.10 | 15.42 | 16.80 | |
| 13.05 | 12.44 | 13.70 | |
| 30.98 | 30.12 | 31.86 | |
| 31.60 | 30.73 | 32.48 | |
| 31.62 | 30.75 | 32.5 | |
| 5.80 | 5.38 | 6.25 | |
| 33.99 | 33.11 | 34.89 | |
| 27.31 | 26.49 | 28.16 | |
| 26.20 | 25.38 | 27.03 | |
| 12.49 | 11.89 | 13.13 | |
| 45.36 | 44.43 | 46.3 | |
| 43.35 | 42.43 | 44.29 | |
| 11.28 | 10.7 | 11.89 | |
| 79.1 | 78.32 | 79.85 | |
| 20.9 | 20.15 | 21.68 | |
| 31.66 | 30.79 | 32.54 | |
| 10.13 | 9.58 | 10.71 | |
| 58.21 | 57.28 | 59.13 | |
| 40.87 | 39.95 | 41.79 | |
| 59.13 | 58.21 | 60.05 | |
| 6.18 | 5.75 | 6.65 | |
| 21.38 | 20.62 | 22.16 | |
| 40.49 | 39.58 | 41.42 | |
| 31.94 | 31.08 | 32.83 | |
| 71.35 | 70.49 | 72.19 | |
| 28.65 | 27.81 | 29.51 | |
| 61.69 | 60.77 | 62.59 | |
| 38.31 | 37.41 | 39.23 | |
| 65.68 | 64.78 | 66.56 | |
| 4.66 | 4.28 | 5.07 | |
| 29.66 | 28.81 | 30.53 | |
| 46.21 | 45.27 | 47.14 | |
| 53.79 | 52.86 | 54.73 | |
| 7.27 | 6.8 | 7.78 | |
| 71.21 | 70.36 | 72.05 | |
| 21.51 | 20.75 | 22.29 | |
CI: confidence interval; NGO: non-government organization; SD: standard deviation; No formal education, primary, secondary, and higher education refers to not attaining any formal education, completing grade 5, grade 10, and completing higher than grade 10, respectively.
Coefficients from the poisson regression analysis examining the perceived ideal number of children by socio-demographic and empowerment characteristics.
| Characteristics of Sample | Coefficient (95% CI) | Robust SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | |||
| 0.04 (0.02, 0.06) | 0.01 | ||
| - | |||
| 0.08 (0.05, 0.10) | 0.01 | ||
| 0.15 (0.13, 0.18) | 0.01 | ||
| 0.05 (0.03, 0.07) | 0.01 | ||
| -0.02 (-0.04, 0.01) | 0.01 | 0.141 | |
| 0.02 (0.01, 0.05) | 0.01 | ||
| 0.18 (0.15, 0.21) | 0.02 | ||
| 0.05 (0.02, 0.08) | 0.02 | ||
| 0.03 (0.01, 0.06) | 0.01 | ||
| 0.02 (0.00, 0.05) | 0.01 | 0.077 | |
| 0.04 (0.01, 0.06) | 0.01 | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| -0.08 (-0.1, -0.06) | 0.01 | ||
| -0.1 (-0.17, -0.02) | 0.04 | ||
| 0.21 (0.13, 0.30) | 0.40 | ||
| 0.28 (0.20, 0.37) | 0.40 | ||
| 0.35 (0.27, 0.43) | 0.40 | ||
| 0.39 (0.30,0.47) | 0.40 | ||
| 0.40 (0.31, 0.49) | 0.40 | ||
| 0.45 (0.36, 0.53) | 0.40 | ||
| 0.10 (0.06, 0.14) | 0.02 | ||
| 0.07 (0.03, 0.10) | 0.02 | ||
| 0.04 (0.01, 0.08) | 0.02 | ||
| - | |||
| 0.01 (-0.04, 0.03) | 0.02 | 0.825 | |
| 0.01 (-0.03, 0.03) | 0.02 | 0.902 | |
| -0.02 (-0.04, 0.01) | 0.01 | 0.273 | |
| - | |||
| - | |||
| 0.04 (0.02, 0.06) | 0.01 | ||
| 0.01 (-0.01, 0.03) | 0.01 | 0.255 | |
| 0.01 (-0.02, 0.04) | 0.01 | 0.397 | |
| - | |||
| 0.03 (0.01, 0.05) | 0.01 | ||
| - | |||
| 0.04 (-0.01, 0.08) | 0.02 | 0.110 | |
| 0.01 (-0.02, 0.03) | 0.01 | 0.644 | |
| 0.01 (-0.02, 0.02) | 0.01 | 0.733 | |
| - | |||
| - | |||
| 0.02 (0.01, 0.04) | 0.01 | ||
| 0.01 (0.00, 0.03) | 0.01 | 0.104 | |
| - | |||
| 0.03 (0.01, 0.05) | 0.01 | ||
| 0.02 (-0.01, 0.06) | 0.02 | 0.196 | |
| - | |||
®: Reference category; CI: confidence interval; SE: standard error
Logistic regression analysis of associated factors for unmet fertility desires among women by socio-demographic and empowerment characteristics.
| Characteristics of Sample | Unadjusted model (Model I) | Adjusted model (Model II) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||
| | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| | 1.39 (1.27, 1.51) | 1.11 (0.99, 1.23) | 0.067 | |
| | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| | 1.51 (1.26, 1.82) | 1.59 (1.30, 1.95) | ||
| | 1.69 (1.47, 1.94) | 2.32 (1.98, 2.73) | ||
| | 1.29 (1.14, 1.46) | 1.47 (1.28, 1.69) | ||
| | 1.07 (0.91, 1.25) | 0.420 | 1.12 (0.95, 1.33) | 0.181 |
| | 1.13 (0.97, 1.31) | 0.119 | 1.13 (0.96, 1.34) | 0.140 |
| | 2.02 (1.68, 2.43) | 2.20 (1.80, 2.70) | ||
| | 1.95 (1.73, 2.21) | 1.60 (1.32, 1.92) | ||
| | 1.64 (1.46, 1.86) | 1.19 (1.00, 1.41) | 0.056 | |
| | 1.45 (1.28, 1.63) | 1.09 (0.93, 1.28) | 0.274 | |
| | 1.26 (1.12, 1.42) | 1.01 (0.87, 1.16) | 0.936 | |
| | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| | 0.6 (0.53, 0.69) | 0.58 (0.5, 0.67) | ||
| | 0.5 (0.37, 0.68) | 0.31 (0.22, 0.43) | ||
| 0.02 (0.01, 0.05) | 0.02 (0.01, 0.04) | |||
| 0.12 (0.10, 0.15) | 0.09 (0.08, 0.12) | |||
| 0.31 (0.27, 0.36) | 0.27 (0.23, 0.32) | |||
| 0.61 (0.53, 0.69) | 0.54 (0.47, 0.63) | |||
| 0.70 (0.61, 0.80) | 0.64 (0.55, 0.74) | |||
| 0.87 (0.75, 1.00) | 0.79 (0.68, 0.92) | |||
| 1.00 | ||||
| | 5.92 (4.80, 7.31) | 2.65 (2.03, 3.45) | ||
| | 4.28 (3.47, 5.28) | 2.56 (1.98, 3.31) | ||
| | 2.36 (1.91, 2.91) | 2.09 (1.64, 2.65) | ||
| | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| | 3.07 (2.69, 3.51) | 1.65 (1.36, 2.00) | ||
| | 2.45 (2.13, 2.81) | 1.69 (1.41, 2.02) | ||
| | 1.67 (1.45, 1.92) | 1.34 (1.14, 1.58) | ||
| | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| | 1.48 (1.35, 1.63) | 0.89 (0.80, 0.99) | ||
| | 1.14 (1.05, 1.24) | 0.93 (0.83, 1.03) | 0.171 | |
| | 1.17 (1.03, 1.33) | 0.92 (0.80, 1.06) | 0.239 | |
| | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| | 1.63 (1.51, 1.76) | 1.10 (0.99, 1.22) | 0.072 | |
| | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| | 0.87 (0.73, 1.02) | 0.091 | 0.82 (0.67, 1.01) | 0.058 |
| | 1.08 (0.97, 1.20) | 0.170 | 1.07 (0.94, 1.21) | 0.289 |
| | 1.14 (1.04, 1.25) | 1.02 (0.91, 1.14) | 0.752 | |
| | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| | 1.07 (0.98, 1.16) | 0.129 | 0.92 (0.84, 1.01) | 0.087 |
| | 0.86 (0.80, 0.93) | 0.90 (0.83, 0.99) | ||
| | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| | 1.02 (0.94, 1.11) | 0.652 | 1.17 (1.07, 1.28) | |
| | 0.91 (0.75, 1.10) | 0.319 | 0.91 (0.74, 1.11) | 0.345 |
| | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
®: Reference category; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval
1 Model I represents findings from bivariate logistic regression analysis; and
2 Model II shows the findings from the multivariate logistic regression analysis.