| Literature DB >> 31171825 |
Jaya D Chidambaram1, Namperumalsamy V Prajna2,3, Srikanthi Palepu2, Shruti Lanjewar2, Manisha Shah2,3, Shanmugam Elakkiya3, Prajna Lalitha2,3, David Macleod4, Matthew J Burton4,5.
Abstract
HRT3 in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) images may indicate clinical outcome, but few studies have analysed this in fungal keratitis (FK). Adults with FK (diameter ≥3 mm) presenting to Aravind Eye Hospital, India from 2012-3 were enrolled prospectively. IVCM was performed at baseline, days 7, 14 and 21 post-enrolment (+/- 3 days where possible). Specific morphologies were identified in IVCM images by a grader masked to microbiology and clinical outcome (defined as good: healed/improving, or poor: enlarged ulcer, perforation or transplant/glue). Associations with final visit outcome assessed using logistic regression. 143 FK participants were enrolled; 87 had good outcome, 56 had poor outcome. Poor outcomes were associated with stellate interconnected cellular processes with no visible nuclei (OR 2.28, 95% CI: 1.03-5.06, p = 0.043) in baseline IVCM images, and fungal filaments (OR 6.48, 95% CI:2.50-16.78, p < 0.001) or honeycomb distribution of inflammatory cells (OR 5.24, 95% CI: 1.44-19.06, p = 0.012) in final visit images. Fungal filaments (OR 3.61, 95% CI:1.64-7.95, p = 0.001), stromal dendritiform cells (OR 2.88, 95% CI:1.17-7.11, p = 0.022), or stellate cellular processes with no visible nuclei (OR 2.09, 95% CI:1.14-3.82, p = 0.017) were associated with poor outcome if not in baseline but present in final visit images. IVCM can reveal morphological changes associated with clinical outcome.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31171825 PMCID: PMC6554396 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44833-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Details of the grading scheme used to classify HRT3 in vivo confocal microscopy images of fungal keratitis at each visit.
| Grading Scheme Component | Morphological Details |
|---|---|
| Fungi | Linear white hyper-reflective structures, width: 3–6 microns, length up to 400 microns. Often forming a branching pattern (Fig. |
| Bullae | Dark hypo-reflective lacunae within epithelial cell layer or stromal layer (Fig. |
| Scar tissue | Stromal tissue of homogenous reflectivity. Usually acellular. Occasionally contains bullae (Fig. |
| “Spindles” | Very straight linear, hyper-reflective structures with no branching. Often occurring in groups that are parallel to each other (Fig. |
| Dendritiform cells | Hyper-reflective cells, with long cellular processes extending outwards in multiple directions from the cell body (Fig. |
| Normal, quiescent keratocytes | Hyper-reflective ovoid nuclei with partially visible cellular processes, connected to cellular processes of adjacent keratocytes in a honeycomb formation (Fig. |
| “Activated” keratocytes with visible nuclei | Bright hyper-reflective ovoid nuclei with broad cellular processes that are interconnected forming a stellate appearance (Fig. |
| “Activated” keratocytes without any visible nuclei | As above, broad interconnected stellate appearance of keratocyte network of cellular processes but with no visible ovoid nuclei within the cells (Fig. |
| “Granules” | Granular appearance of hyper-reflective material (1–2 microns in diameter) within keratocyte cellular processes or within cell nuclei (Fig. |
| “Inflammatory” cells | Small, bright hyper-reflective round cells (approx. 10 microns in diameter) often seen in large numbers in the affected tissue. Can form a honeycomb distribution within the corneal stroma (Fig. |
Figure 1HRT3 in vivo confocal microscopy images at final visit showing: (A) fungal filaments in the corneal stroma (arrow shows activated keratocytes with granular intracellular contents), (B) stromal bullae shown by arrow, and (C) acellular scar tissue in lower half of image, (D) several “spindles” (indicated by arrow) occurring in parallel, adjacent to each other, and (E) dendritiform cells in the anterior stroma.
Figure 2HRT3 in vivo confocal microscopy images of keratocytes in fungal keratitis showing: (A) normal keratocyte morphology (bright ovoid nuclei with barely visible cellular processes), (B) stellate interconnected cellular processes with bright ovoid nuclei (shown by arrow), (C) stellate interconnected cellular processes but no visible nuclei (arrow shows granular intracellular appearance), (D) inflammatory cells in a honeycomb distribution.
Baseline characteristics of 143 study participants by clinical outcome.
| Poor Outcome (n = 56) | Good Outcome (n = 87) | p-valuea | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, median years (IQR) | 50 (37–60) | 45 (35–55) | 0.148 |
| Gender, no. male, (%) | 32 (57%) | 62 (71%) | 0.082 |
| Symptom duration at presentation, median days, (IQR) | 7 (4–15) | 6 (4–10) | 0.022 |
| Days post-enrolment to final visit, median days (IQR) | 16 (10–21) | 21 (20–23) | <0.001 |
| Baseline best-corrected visual acuity, logMAR (IQR) | 1.8 (0.8–1.8) | 1.0 (0.4–1.8) | 0.058 |
| Ulcer infiltrate size, median mm, (IQR)b | 5.0 (3.9–5.9) | 3.7 (3.1–4.5) | <0.001 |
| Posterior 1/3 of cornea affected, n (%) | 39 (70%) | 43 (49%) | 0.017 |
aStatistical differences between groups assessed using either chi-squared test for proportions or kruskall wallis test for non-parametrically distributed continuous variables.
bMaximum infiltrate size at presentation, prior to corneal scraping.
Odds ratios (OR) from univariable and multivariable logistic regression models for poor outcome (compared to good outcome) and morphological features in IVCM images from (i) baseline only, (ii) final visit only, or (iii) features that change from being absent in baseline images to being present in final visit images. Models were adjusted for age, gender, baseline ulcer size and time from symptom onset to final visit (for models including final visit data).
| Morphological Feature | Univariable OR (95% CI) | p-value | Multivariable OR (95% CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Stellate cellular processes no nuclei | 2.30 (1.04–5.08) | 0. 039 | 2.28 (1.03–5.06) | 0.043 |
| Stromal dendritiform cells | 2.99 (0.91–9.80) | 0.070 | 2.93 (0.88–9.67) | 0.077 |
|
| ||||
| Fungal hyphae | 7.25 (3.09–17.02) | <0.001 | 6.48 (2.50–16.78) | <0.001 |
| Inflammatory cells (honeycomb) | 6.42 (2.07–19.89) | <0.001 | 5.24 (1.44–19.06) | 0.012 |
| Scar | 0.17 (0.07–0.40) | <0.001 | 0.20 (0.08–0.54) | 0.001 |
| Inflammatory cells (non-specific distribution) | 2.50 (0.93–6.76) | 0.070 | — | — |
|
| ||||
| Fungal filaments | 4.34 (2.07–9.10) | <0.001 | 3.61 (1.64–7.95) | 0.001 |
| Stromal dendritiform cells | 2.06 (0.89–4.76) | 0.090 | 2.88 (1.17–7.11) | 0.022 |
| Stellate cellular processes with no visible nuclei | 1.61 (0.93–2.77) | 0.088 | 2.09 (1.14–3.82) | 0.017 |
| Stromal scar | 0.27 (0.13–0.54) | <0.001 | 0.22 (0.10–0.49) | <0.001 |
| Inflammatory cells in honeycomb distribution | 2.14 (1.28–3.89) | 0.013 | — | — |
*Conditional logistic regression analysis performed comparing changes within each patient from baseline to final visit (i.e. not between patients).
Figure 3Percentage of fungal keratitis patients with fungal filaments detected in HRT3 in vivo confocal microscopy imaging (Y-axis) at baseline and at each follow-up visit after enrolment (i.e. visit 1 at day 7 +/− 3 days; visit 2 at 14 days+/− 3 days or visit 3 at 21 days+/− 3 days, up to 37 days maximum) in the X-axis, for each clinical outcome.