Literature DB >> 26252743

Predicting Corneal Graft Rejection by Confocal Microscopy.

Viridiana Kocaba1, Caterina Colica, Muriel Rabilloud, Carole Burillon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims at estimating corneal healing by activated keratocyte (AK) counting with in vivo confocal microscopy after perforating keratoplasty (PK). It assesses the value of AK counting in predicting corneal graft rejection.
METHODS: This prospective single-center observational study included 45 patients who benefited from PK in 2013 and were followed up over 2 years. All were monitored by confocal microscopy at day 1, day 7, and monthly thereafter. The AKs were counted in 5 optical sections in each of the anterior, middle, and posterior stroma. The ability of AKs in predicting the occurrence of corneal rejection was assessed by comparison of AK counts between patients with and without clinical signs of rejection.
RESULTS: In patients with graft rejection, the AK counts increased significantly 2 months before the clinical diagnosis of rejection, whereas it remained stable after 4 months in patients without rejection. In patient with graft rejection, the AK count reached a maximum at the rejection diagnosis and antirejection treatment initiation but decreased significantly 1 month after treatment initiation.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the predictive value of AK counting in corneal graft rejection. The increase in the AK count allowed predicting graft rejection 2 months before the clinical diagnosis of rejection; it may then be the first sign of subclinical rejection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26252743     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  9 in total

1.  Cellular morphological changes detected by laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy associated with clinical outcome in fungal keratitis.

Authors:  Jaya D Chidambaram; Namperumalsamy V Prajna; Srikanthi Palepu; Shruti Lanjewar; Manisha Shah; Shanmugam Elakkiya; Prajna Lalitha; David Macleod; Matthew J Burton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  A porous collagen-based hydrogel and implantation method for corneal stromal regeneration and sustained local drug delivery.

Authors:  Maria Xeroudaki; Muthukumar Thangavelu; Anton Lennikov; Anjula Ratnayake; Jovana Bisevac; Goran Petrovski; Per Fagerholm; Mehrdad Rafat; Neil Lagali
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  In vivo Confocal Microscopic Evaluation of Corneal Changes in Acute Endothelial Rejection.

Authors:  Golshan Latifi; Ramon Katoozpour; Reza Ghaffari; Parisa Abdi; Maryam Kasiri; Sahar Berijani
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-22

Review 4.  Corneal Allografts: Factors for and against Acceptance.

Authors:  Justyna Sakowska; Paulina Glasner; Maciej Zieliński; Piotr Trzonkowski; Leopold Glasner
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2021-10-03       Impact factor: 4.818

5.  Corneal Stroma Regeneration with Collagen-Based Hydrogel as an Artificial Stroma Equivalent: A Comprehensive In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Egor Olegovich Osidak; Andrey Yurevich Andreev; Sergey Eduardovich Avetisov; Grigory Victorovich Voronin; Zoya Vasilievna Surnina; Anna Vladimirovna Zhuravleva; Timofei Evgenievich Grigoriev; Sergey Vladimirovich Krasheninnikov; Kirill Konstantinovich Sukhinich; Oleg Vadimovich Zayratyants; Sergey Petrovich Domogatsky
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 4.967

6.  Prediction of corneal graft rejection using central endothelium/Descemet's membrane complex thickness in high-risk corneal transplants.

Authors:  Taher Eleiwa; Amr Elsawy; Eyup Ozcan; Collin Chase; William Feuer; Sonia H Yoo; Victor L Perez; Mohamed F Abou Shousha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Long-lasting corneal endothelial graft rejection successfully reversed after dexamethasone intravitreal implant.

Authors:  Giuseppe Giannaccare; Michela Fresina; Alberto Pazzaglia; Piera Versura
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2016-07-11

Review 8.  Variable Responses to Corneal Grafts: Insights from Immunology and Systems Biology.

Authors:  Antonio Di Zazzo; Sang-Mok Lee; Jaemyoung Sung; Matteo Niutta; Marco Coassin; Alireza Mashaghi; Takenori Inomata
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  The Use of Digital Microscopy to Compare the Thicknesses of Normal Corneas and Ex Vivo Rejected Corneal Grafts with a Focus on the Descemet's Membrane.

Authors:  Taíse Tognon; Sabrina Bergeron; Christina Mastromonaco; Kleyton Barella; Adriano Pasqualotti; Laura Nunez; Francisco Murta; Luciene Barbosa de Sousa; Mauro Campos; Miguel Noel Nascentes Burnier
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 1.909

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.