| Literature DB >> 31170986 |
Zhang Wang1,2, Barbara Maschera3, Simon Lea4, Umme Kolsum4, David Michalovich3, Stephanie Van Horn5, Christopher Traini5, James R Brown6, Edith M Hessel3, Dave Singh4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the interactions between the lung microbiome and host response in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).Entities:
Keywords: COPD; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Clinical study; Exacerbations; Healthy; Microbiome; Next-generation sequencing technologies; Proteome; Smokers; Transcriptome
Year: 2019 PMID: 31170986 PMCID: PMC6555748 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-019-1085-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Major demographic and baseline clinical features of all subjects in this study
| Demographic and baseline clinical features | Healthy Controls ( | COPD Patients ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age, yearsa | 55.0 (8.8) | 65.0 (4.8) |
| Gender, | 11 (68.8) | 31 (72.1) |
| Current Smoker, | 8 (50.0) | 16 (37.2) |
| Number of cigarette packs per year | 34.4 (11.2) | 50.9 (28.2) |
| GOLD Stage: I/II/III/IV, | NA | 2 (4.7)/19 (44.2)/16 (37.2)/6 (14.0) |
| Inhaled steroid use, | NA | 33 (76.7) |
| LABA use, | NA | 34 (79.1) |
| LAMA use, | NA | 35 (81.4) |
| Number of exacerbations per year | NA | 1.9 (1.4) |
| CAT score | NA | 21.8 (8.3) |
| SGRQ total score | NA | 49.0 (22.9) |
| mMRC score | NA | 2.1 (1.2) |
| Pre FEV1 (L) | 3.0 (0.7) | 1.1 (0.5) |
| Pre FVC (L) | 4.1 (1.0) | 2.8 (0.9) |
| Pre FEV1/FVC ratio | 0.73 (0.0) | 0.4 (0.1) |
| Post FEV1 (L) | 3.1 (0.8) | 1.2 (0.6) |
| Post FVC (L) | 4.0 (0.9) | 3.3 (1.0) |
| Post FEV1/FVC ratio | 0.76 (0.0) | 0.4 (0.1) |
a Continuous data present as mean (SD)
b Categorical data present as number (proportion)
GOLD Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, LABA long-acting beta-agonist, LAM long-acting muscarinic antagonist, CAT COPD Assessment Test, SGRQ St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, mMRC modified Medical Research Council, FEV forced expiratory volume in one second, FVC forced vital capacity
Fig. 1Overview of the sputum microbiome taxa distributions. a Overall study clustering for all 101 samples. b Clustering of 32 COPD stable samples. c Clustering of 16 healthy samples. Each column represents one sample colored by different subgroups. Y-axis represents relative abundances of major phyla and genera. Samples were clustered by UPGMA clustering based on the weighted UniFrac distances. HNS: healthy non-smokers, HS: healthy smokers, CS: COPD current smokers, ES: COPD ex-smokers, non-ICS: non-ICS exposer, ICS: ICS exposer, IE: infrequent exacerbators, FE: frequent exacerbators
Fig. 2Sputum microbiome profiles in healthy subjects and COPD patients. a Shannon diversity and relative abundance of major bacterial taxa in healthy controls and stable COPD patients, and in healthy and COPD subgroups in relation to smoking status. b Shannon diversity and relative abundances of major bacterial taxa in COPD patients at different visits. The number of samples in each group is indicated in the parenthesis. Significantly differentially represented bacterial taxa were identified using edgeR [27]. For visit, statistical analysis was performed on each adjacent two time points. E0: COPD exacerbations, E2: 2 week post-exacerbations, E6: 6 week post-exacerbations, 6 Months: 6 months from first stable visit, HNS: healthy non-smokers, HS: healthy smokers, CS: COPD current smokers, ES: COPD ex-smokers. *** FDR P < 0.001, ** FDR P < 0.01, * FDR P < 0.05
Fig. 3Significant spearman correlations (with 95% confidence intervals calculated by univariate regression model) between major sputum microbiome compositions with sputum leukocyte percentages
Fig. 4Multivariate modeling showed strong association of Haemophilus and Moraxella with host transcriptome and proteome profiles. a A host-microbiome interaction network illustrating significant associations among the 9 most abundant bacterial genera and Shannon diversity, tPCs and pPCs in GLMM. Each edge indicates a significant association (FDR P ≤ 0.05) colored by direction. The edge weight corresponds to the significance of the P-value. The size of the node is proportional to the number of significant associations involving the node. b GSEA enrichment scores of the top pathways on the loadings of each tPC. For each tPC, the top 10 positively and negatively enriched pathways (FDR P ≤ 0.01) were included in the heatmap. Pathways were clustered using complete clustering and colored by their clustering groups. The functional categories of the pathways are overall in agreement with their clustering groups. c Top loadings of each pPC. For each pPC, the top 6 proteins by magnitude of loadings were included in the heatmap
Associations of the 9 bacterial genera and Shannon diversity with tPCs both across all samples and within stable samples in generalized linear mixed models. FDR P-values are indicated in the table. Significant associations are highlighted in asterisks. Only significant variables were included in the final model unless otherwise stated
| Microbiome | Transcriptome | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tPC1 | tPC2 | tPC3 | tPC4 | tPC5 | tPC6 | tPC7 | tPC8 | tPC9 | ||
| All |
| 0.57 | 0.05* | 0.91 | 0.39 | 0.32 | 0.53 | 0.71 | 0.82 | 0.70 |
|
| 0.34 | 0.42 | 0.04* | 0.25 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.14 | |
|
| 0.01* | 1E-4* | 3E-3* | 0.97 | 0.68 | 0.41 | 0.01* | 0.33 | 0.02* | |
|
| 0.19 | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.67 | 0.59 | 0.87 | 0.03* | 0.36 | 0.36 | |
|
| 0.03* | 0.45 | 0.88 | 5E-4* | 0.09 | 0.30 | 0.01* | 0.02* | 0.02* | |
|
| 2E-4* | 0.95 | 0.15 | 0.03* | 0.28 | 0.78 | 0.91 | 0.84 | 0.79 | |
|
| 5E-3* | 0.92 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.05* | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.23 | |
|
| 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.38 | 0.52 | 0.94 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.57 | 0.46 | |
|
| 0.29 | 0.97 | 0.13 | 0.24 | 0.09 | 0.04* | 0.33 | 0.21 | 0.48 | |
| Shannon | 0.01* | 0.10 | 0.02* | 0.91 | 0.51 | 0.03* | 0.04* | 0.06 | 0.92 | |
| Stable |
| 0.27 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.95 | 0.08 | 0.83 | 0.53 |
|
| 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 0.51 | 0.56 | 0.67 | 0.27 | 0.90 | 0.27 | |
|
| 0.10 | 0.01* | 0.04* | 0.36 | 0.76 | 0.62 | 0.16 | 0.31 | 0.51 | |
|
| 0.80 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.28 | 0.56 | 3E-3* | 0.08a | 0.86 | 0.51 | |
|
| 0.40 | 0.59 | 0.81 | 0.46 | 0.57 | 0.35 | 0.75 | 0.13 | 0.24 | |
|
| 0.58 | 0.43 | 0.02* | 0.50 | 0.39 | 0.07a | 0.45 | 0.67 | 0.78 | |
|
| 0.73 | 0.49 | 0.95 | 0.44 | 0.09a | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.83 | 0.60 | |
|
| 0.39 | 0.73 | 0.52 | 0.82 | 0.42 | 0.90 | 0.03* | 0.72 | 2E-3* | |
|
| 0.02* | 0.59 | 0.50 | 0.58 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.57 | 0.88 | 0.56 | |
| Shannon | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.33 | 0.26 | 0.37 | 0.92 | 0.07 | 0.26 | |
aVariables not statistically significant but present in the model
Associations of the 9 bacterial genera and Shannon diversity with pPCs both across all samples and within stable samples in generalized linear mixed models. FDR P-values are indicated in the table. Significant associations are highlighted in asterisks. Only significant variables were included in the final model unless otherwise stated
| Microbiome | Proteome | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pPC1 | pPC2 | pPC3 | pPC4 | pPC5 | pPC6 | pPC7 | pPC8 | ||
| All |
| 0.04* | 0.82 | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.40 | 0.19 | 0.62 | 0.04* |
|
| 0.52 | 0.94 | 0.01* | 0.11 | 0.02* | 0.76 | 0.01* | 0.34 | |
|
| 0.01* | 0.06 | 1E-3* | 0.69 | 0.25 | 0.47 | 0.64 | 0.56 | |
|
| 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.45 | 0.93 | 0.13 | 0.61 | |
|
| 1E-3* | 0.54 | 0.05a | 0.45 | 0.13 | 0.40 | 0.85 | 0.52 | |
|
| 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.06a | 0.67 | 0.51 | 0.01* | 1E-4* | 0.84 | |
|
| 0.03* | 0.06a | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.02* | 0.01* | 0.02* | 0.06 | |
|
| 0.67 | 0.12 | 0.04* | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.58 | 0.49 | 0.55 | |
|
| 2E-3* | 0.14 | 0.58 | 0.12 | 0.72 | 0.69 | 0.13 | 0.29 | |
| Shannon | 0.04* | 0.54 | 0.78 | 0.10 | 0.03* | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.09 | |
| Stable |
| 0.05a | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.71 | 0.47 | 0.99 | 0.34 |
|
| 0.73 | 0.05a | 0.21 | 0.03* | 0.86 | 0.38 | 0.70 | 0.50 | |
|
| 0.03* | 0.03* | 2E-3* | 0.08 | 0.75 | 0.29 | 0.73 | 0.60 | |
|
| 0.03* | 0.93 | 0.58 | 0.35 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.62 | 0.24 | |
|
| 0.46 | 0.97 | 0.26 | 0.59 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.30 | 0.79 | |
|
| 0.38 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.69 | 0.80 | 0.27 | 0.67 | 0.25 | |
|
| 0.23 | 0.66 | 0.58 | 0.70 | 0.46 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 0.99 | |
|
| 0.23 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.56 | 0.95 | 0.42 | 0.96 | 0.21 | |
|
| 0.75 | 0.01* | 0.65 | 0.03* | 0.07a | 0.70 | 0.39 | 0.05* | |
| Shannon | 0.25 | 0.04* | 0.13 | 0.02* | 0.33 | 0.58 | 0.77 | 0.41 | |
aVariables not statistically significant but present in the model