Arie Levine1, Eytan Wine2, Amit Assa3, Rotem Sigall Boneh1, Ron Shaoul4, Michal Kori5, Shlomi Cohen6, Sarit Peleg7, Hussein Shamaly8, Avi On9, Peri Millman10, Lee Abramas1, Tomer Ziv-Baran11, Shannan Grant12, Guila Abitbol13, Katherine A Dunn14, Joseph P Bielawski14, Johan Van Limbergen15. 1. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Sackler School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 2. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. 3. Schneider Hospital, Petach Tikvah, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 4. Ruth Children's Hospital, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel. 5. Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel. 6. Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, "Dana-Dwek" Children's Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 7. HaEmek hospital, Afula, Israel. 8. French Hospital, Nazareth, Israel. 9. Poriah Hospital, Tiberias, Israel. 10. Hadassah Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel. 11. Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. 12. Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Canada; IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. 13. Shaare-Zedek Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel. 14. Department of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. 15. IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada; Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.e.vanlimbergen@amc.uva.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS:Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is recommended for children with mild to moderate Crohn's disease (CD), but implementation is challenging. We compared EEN with the CD exclusion diet (CDED), a whole-food diet coupled with partial enteral nutrition (PEN), designed to reduce exposure to dietary components that have adverse effects on the microbiome and intestinal barrier. METHODS: We performed a 12-week prospective trial of children with mild to moderate CD. The children were randomly assigned to a group that received CDED plus 50% of calories from formula (Modulen, Nestlé) for 6 weeks (stage 1) followed by CDED with 25% PEN from weeks 7 to 12 (stage 2) (n = 40, group 1) or a group that received EEN for 6 weeks followed by a free diet with 25% PEN from weeks 7 to 12 (n = 38, group 2). Patients were evaluated at baseline and weeks 3, 6, and 12 and laboratory tests were performed; 16S ribosomal RNA gene (V4V5) sequencing was performed on stool samples. The primary endpoint was dietary tolerance. Secondary endpoints were intention to treat (ITT) remission at week 6 (pediatric CD activity index score below 10) and corticosteroid-free ITT sustained remission at week 12. RESULTS:Four patients withdrew from the study because of intolerance by 48 hours, 74 patients (mean age 14.2 ± 2.7 years) were included for remission analysis. The combination of CDED and PEN was tolerated in 39 children (97.5%), whereas EEN was tolerated by 28 children (73.6%) (P = .002; odds ratio for tolerance of CDED and PEN, 13.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68-115.14). At week 6, 30 (75%) of 40 children given CDED plus PEN were in corticosteroid-free remission vs 20 (59%) of 34 children given EEN (P = .38). At week 12, 28 (75.6%) of 37 children given CDED plus PEN were in corticosteroid-free remission compared with 14 (45.1%) of 31 children given EEN and then PEN (P = .01; odds ratio for remission in children given CDED and PEN, 3.77; CI 1.34-10.59). In children given CDED plus PEN, corticosteroid-free remission was associated with sustained reductions in inflammation (based on serum level of C-reactive protein and fecal level of calprotectin) and fecal Proteobacteria. CONCLUSION:CDED plus PEN was better tolerated than EEN in children with mild to moderate CD. Both diets were effective in inducing remission by week 6. The combination CDED plus PEN induced sustained remission in a significantly higher proportion of patients than EEN, and produced changes in the fecal microbiome associated with remission. These data support use of CDED plus PEN to induce remission in children with CD. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT01728870.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is recommended for children with mild to moderate Crohn's disease (CD), but implementation is challenging. We compared EEN with the CD exclusion diet (CDED), a whole-food diet coupled with partial enteral nutrition (PEN), designed to reduce exposure to dietary components that have adverse effects on the microbiome and intestinal barrier. METHODS: We performed a 12-week prospective trial of children with mild to moderate CD. The children were randomly assigned to a group that received CDED plus 50% of calories from formula (Modulen, Nestlé) for 6 weeks (stage 1) followed by CDED with 25% PEN from weeks 7 to 12 (stage 2) (n = 40, group 1) or a group that received EEN for 6 weeks followed by a free diet with 25% PEN from weeks 7 to 12 (n = 38, group 2). Patients were evaluated at baseline and weeks 3, 6, and 12 and laboratory tests were performed; 16S ribosomal RNA gene (V4V5) sequencing was performed on stool samples. The primary endpoint was dietary tolerance. Secondary endpoints were intention to treat (ITT) remission at week 6 (pediatric CD activity index score below 10) and corticosteroid-free ITT sustained remission at week 12. RESULTS: Four patients withdrew from the study because of intolerance by 48 hours, 74 patients (mean age 14.2 ± 2.7 years) were included for remission analysis. The combination of CDED and PEN was tolerated in 39 children (97.5%), whereas EEN was tolerated by 28 children (73.6%) (P = .002; odds ratio for tolerance of CDED and PEN, 13.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.68-115.14). At week 6, 30 (75%) of 40 children given CDED plus PEN were in corticosteroid-free remission vs 20 (59%) of 34 children given EEN (P = .38). At week 12, 28 (75.6%) of 37 children given CDED plus PEN were in corticosteroid-free remission compared with 14 (45.1%) of 31 children given EEN and then PEN (P = .01; odds ratio for remission in children given CDED and PEN, 3.77; CI 1.34-10.59). In children given CDED plus PEN, corticosteroid-free remission was associated with sustained reductions in inflammation (based on serum level of C-reactive protein and fecal level of calprotectin) and fecal Proteobacteria. CONCLUSION:CDED plus PEN was better tolerated than EEN in children with mild to moderate CD. Both diets were effective in inducing remission by week 6. The combination CDED plus PEN induced sustained remission in a significantly higher proportion of patients than EEN, and produced changes in the fecal microbiome associated with remission. These data support use of CDED plus PEN to induce remission in children with CD. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT01728870.
Authors: Chun-Han Lo; Paul Lochhead; Hamed Khalili; Mingyang Song; Fred K Tabung; Kristin E Burke; James M Richter; Edward L Giovannucci; Andrew T Chan; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 22.682