Literature DB >> 31170358

An ecological study of NHS funded elective hip arthroplasties in England from 2003/04 to 2012/13.

Shailen Sutaria1, Graham Kirkwood2, Allyson M Pollock2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact of NHS-funded private provision on NHS provision, access and inequalities.
DESIGN: Ecological study using routinely collected NHS inpatient data.
SETTING: England. PARTICIPANTS: All individuals undergoing an NHS-funded elective hip arthroplasty in England from 2003/2004 to 2012/2013. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual crude and standardised rates of hip arthroplasties per 100,000 population performed by NHS and private providers between 2004/2005 and 2012/2013.
RESULTS: Age standardised rates of hip arthroplasty increased from 116.4 (95% CI 115.4-117.4) to 148.7 (147.6-149.8) per 100,000 between 2004/2005 and 2012/2013. Provision shifted from NHS providers to private providers from 2007/2008; NHS provision decreased 8.6% and private provision increased 188% between 2007/2008 and 2012/2013. There is evidence of risk selection; private sector hip arthroplasties on NHS patients from the most affluent areas increased 228% from 10.8 (10.2-11.5) to 35.4 (34.3-36.5) per 100,000 compared to an increase of 186% from 8.8 (8.1-9.4) to 25.2 (24.1-26.4) per 100,000 among patients from the least affluent areas between 2007/2008 and 2012/2013. There was no statistically significant (p > 0.05) widening in any measure of inequality (absolute, relative difference and slope and relative slope of index inequality) in hip arthroplasty rates between 2004/2005 and 2012/2013.
CONCLUSION: Private provision substituted for NHS provision and did not add to overall provision favouring patients living in the most affluent area. Continuing the trend towards private provision and reducing NHS provision is likely to result in risk selection and widening inequalities in provision of elective hip arthroplasty in England.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; health policy; health service research; quantitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31170358      PMCID: PMC6613275          DOI: 10.1177/0141076819851701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  15 in total

Review 1.  Measures of health inequalities: part 2.

Authors:  Enrique Regidor
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  The operation of the century: total hip replacement.

Authors:  Ian D Learmonth; Claire Young; Cecil Rorabeck
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Measuring the magnitude of socio-economic inequalities in health: an overview of available measures illustrated with two examples from Europe.

Authors:  J P Mackenbach; A E Kunst
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  A third of NHS contracts awarded since health act have gone to private sector, BMJ investigation shows.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-12-10

5.  Patient choice and private provision decreased public provision and increased inequalities in Scotland: a case study of elective hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  G Kirkwood; A M Pollock
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.341

6.  Private sector treatment centres are treating less complex patients than the NHS.

Authors:  Anne Mason; Andrew Street; Rossella Verzulli
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Socioeconomic inequality in small area use of elective total hip replacement in the English National Health Service in 1991 and 2001.

Authors:  Richard Cookson; Mark Dusheiko; Geoffrey Hardman
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2007-04

8.  The economic benefit of hip replacement: a 5-year follow-up of costs and outcomes in the Exeter Primary Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Richard Fordham; Jane Skinner; Xia Wang; John Nolan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Outcomes of elective surgery undertaken in independent sector treatment centres and NHS providers in England: audit of patient outcomes in surgery.

Authors:  J Chard; M Kuczawski; N Black; J van der Meulen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-19

10.  Case-mix & patients' reports of outcome in Independent Sector Treatment Centres: Comparison with NHS providers.

Authors:  John Browne; Liz Jamieson; Jim Lewsey; Jan van der Meulen; Lynn Copley; Nick Black
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  2 in total

1.  Health is politics writ large and small.

Authors:  Kamran Abbasi
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  The return of inverse care: Case study of elective hip surgery.

Authors:  Graham Kirkwood; Allyson M Pollock
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-08-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.