Literature DB >> 27474759

Patient choice and private provision decreased public provision and increased inequalities in Scotland: a case study of elective hip arthroplasty.

G Kirkwood1, A M Pollock1.   

Abstract

Background: This is the first research to examine how the policy of patient choice and commercial contracting where NHS funds are given to private providers to tackle waiting times, impacted on direct NHS provision and treatment inequalities.
Methods: An ecological study of NHS funded elective primary hip arthroplasties in Scotland using routinely collected inpatient data 1 April 1993-31 March 2013.
Results: An increased use of private sector provision by NHS Boards was associated with a significant decrease in direct NHS provision in 2008/09 (P < 0.01) and with widening inequalities by age and socio-economic deprivation. National treatment rate fell from 143.8 (140.3, 147.3) per 100 000 in 2006/07 to 137.8 (134.4, 141.2) per 100 000 in 2007/08. By 2012/13, territorial NHS Boards had not recovered 2006/07 levels of provision; this was most marked for NHS Boards with the greatest use of private sector, namely Fife, Grampian and Lothian. Patients aged 85 years and over or living in the more deprived areas of Scotland appear to have been disadvantaged since the onset of patient choice in 2002. Conclusions: NHS funding of private sector provision for elective hip arthroplasty was associated with a decrease in public provision and may have contributed to an increase in age and socio-economic inequalities in treatment rates.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; health services; social determinants

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27474759     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)        ISSN: 1741-3842            Impact factor:   2.341


  5 in total

1.  An ecological study of NHS funded elective hip arthroplasties in England from 2003/04 to 2012/13.

Authors:  Shailen Sutaria; Graham Kirkwood; Allyson M Pollock
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  An ecological study of publicly funded elective hip arthroplasties in Brazil and Scotland: do access inequalities reinforce the inverse care law?

Authors:  Jonathan Filippon; Stephen Bremner; Ligia Giovanella; Allyson Pollock
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2020-05-06

3.  What motivates physicians to propose private services in a mixed private-public healthcare system? A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Tal Michael; Dani Filc; Nadav Davidovitch
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  The return of inverse care: Case study of elective hip surgery.

Authors:  Graham Kirkwood; Allyson M Pollock
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health Eur       Date:  2022-08-22

5.  Can changes in spending on health and social care explain the recent mortality trends in Scotland? A protocol for an observational study.

Authors:  Christina Wraw; Jon Minton; Rory Mitchell; Grant M A Wyper; Clare Campbell; Gerry McCartney
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.