OBJECTIVE: Clinicians and caregivers rely on milestone checklists as tools for tracking a child's development. In addition, medical students and residents use milestone checklists to learn about normal child development. However, there are multiple published milestone checklists that vary qualitatively in structure and content, hindering their effective use in developmental surveillance and medical education. This project systematically evaluated the consistency and variability between commonly used milestone checklists. METHODS: A team of child psychologists and developmental pediatricians reviewed a total of 1094 milestones derived from 4 published checklists (2 developed for providers, 2 developed for caregivers) to create a comprehensive set of 728 discrete developmental observations, with each observation mapped to corresponding milestones. This observation-milestone relational database was then used to determine the degree of content overlap and milestone age range concordance across milestone checklists. RESULTS: Of the 728 discrete developmental observations, 40 (5.5%) were mapped to milestones in all 4 milestone checklists, and an additional 90 (12.4%) were mapped to 3 checklists. Among these 40 "universal" observations, most (42.5%) were in the motor domain. Of those 130 observations mapped to milestones in at least 3 of the 4 checklists, 26.9% (35/130) were mapped to milestones that were discordant in their associated age range. CONCLUSION: Four commonly used developmental milestone checklists were found to have limited overlap in content, and those that overlapped were inconsistent in their associated age ranges. The resulting observation-milestone relational database could be used to further validate age estimates of milestones and facilitate milestone surveillance through the electronic health record.
OBJECTIVE: Clinicians and caregivers rely on milestone checklists as tools for tracking a child's development. In addition, medical students and residents use milestone checklists to learn about normal child development. However, there are multiple published milestone checklists that vary qualitatively in structure and content, hindering their effective use in developmental surveillance and medical education. This project systematically evaluated the consistency and variability between commonly used milestone checklists. METHODS: A team of child psychologists and developmental pediatricians reviewed a total of 1094 milestones derived from 4 published checklists (2 developed for providers, 2 developed for caregivers) to create a comprehensive set of 728 discrete developmental observations, with each observation mapped to corresponding milestones. This observation-milestone relational database was then used to determine the degree of content overlap and milestone age range concordance across milestone checklists. RESULTS: Of the 728 discrete developmental observations, 40 (5.5%) were mapped to milestones in all 4 milestone checklists, and an additional 90 (12.4%) were mapped to 3 checklists. Among these 40 "universal" observations, most (42.5%) were in the motor domain. Of those 130 observations mapped to milestones in at least 3 of the 4 checklists, 26.9% (35/130) were mapped to milestones that were discordant in their associated age range. CONCLUSION: Four commonly used developmental milestone checklists were found to have limited overlap in content, and those that overlapped were inconsistent in their associated age ranges. The resulting observation-milestone relational database could be used to further validate age estimates of milestones and facilitate milestone surveillance through the electronic health record.
Authors: Laura Sices; Chris Feudtner; John McLaughlin; Dennis Drotar; Michelle Williams Journal: J Dev Behav Pediatr Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 2.225
Authors: Aaron E Carroll; Nerissa S Bauer; Tamara M Dugan; Vibha Anand; Chandan Saha; Stephen M Downs Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Nina Sand; Michael Silverstein; Frances P Glascoe; Vidya B Gupta; Thomas P Tonniges; Karen G O'Connor Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: James P Guevara; Marsha Gerdes; Russell Localio; Yuanshung V Huang; Jennifer Pinto-Martin; Cynthia S Minkovitz; Diane Hsu; Lara Kyriakou; Sofia Baglivo; Jane Kavanagh; Susmita Pati Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-12-17 Impact factor: 7.124