Literature DB >> 31169402

Beyond arousal: Prediction error related to aversive events promotes episodic memory formation.

Felix Kalbe1, Lars Schwabe1.   

Abstract

Stimuli encoded shortly before an aversive event are typically well remembered. Traditionally, this emotional memory enhancement has been attributed to beneficial effects of physiological arousal on memory formation. Here, we proposed an additional mechanism and tested whether memory formation is driven by the unpredictable nature of aversive events (i.e., aversive prediction errors). In a combined Pavlovian fear conditioning and incidental memory paradigm, participants saw initially neutral pictures from 2 distinct categories, 1 of which was associated with a risk to receive an electric shock. During encoding, we measured both physiological arousal and explicit prediction errors to explain memory differences in a surprise recognition test that followed approximately 24 hr later. In a first experiment, we show that physiological arousal, expressed as outcome-related skin conductance responses, was associated with improved recognition memory, corroborating arousal-based models. Critically, unsigned binary prediction errors derived from explicit shock expectancy ratings in each trial were also linked to enhanced recognition and model fits showed that the impact of prediction errors on memory was dissociable from the impact of arousal. In a second experiment, we replicated and extended the findings of the first experiment by demonstrating that the memory-promoting effect of prediction errors remained even after controlling for arousal. The present data point to prediction error-related learning as a cognitive mechanism that contributes to the emotional enhancement of memory, above and beyond the well-established effects of arousal in emotional memory formation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31169402     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  7 in total

Review 1.  Reward prediction errors create event boundaries in memory.

Authors:  Nina Rouhani; Kenneth A Norman; Yael Niv; Aaron M Bornstein
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-06-17

2.  Valence biases in reinforcement learning shift across adolescence and modulate subsequent memory.

Authors:  Gail M Rosenbaum; Hannah L Grassie; Catherine A Hartley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  In for a penny, in for a pound: examining motivated memory through the lens of retrieved context models.

Authors:  Deborah Talmi; Deimante Kavaliauskaite; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Mnemonic prediction errors promote detailed memories.

Authors:  Oded Bein; Natalie A Plotkin; Lila Davachi
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Expectancy Violation Drives Memory Boost for Stressful Events.

Authors:  Felix Kalbe; Stina Bange; Annika Lutz; Lars Schwabe
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-10-16

6.  Signed and unsigned reward prediction errors dynamically enhance learning and memory.

Authors:  Nina Rouhani; Yael Niv
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  The human insula processes both modality-independent and pain-selective learning signals.

Authors:  Björn Horing; Christian Büchel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 9.593

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.