| Literature DB >> 31168394 |
Francesco Bianco1,2, Vincenzo Cicchitti1, Valentina Bucciarelli1, Alvin Chandra2, Enrico Di Girolamo3, Gianni Pedrizzetti4, Gianni Tonti1, Silvio Romano5, Raffaele De Caterina1, Sabina Gallina1.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess differences in blood flow momentum (BFM) and kinetic energy (KE) dissipation in a model of cardiac dyssynchrony induced by electrical right ventricular apical (RVA) stimulation compared with spontaneous sinus rhythm.Entities:
Keywords: blood flow momentum; cardiac dyssynchrony; heart failure; intraventricular flow patterns; right ventricular pacing
Year: 2019 PMID: 31168394 PMCID: PMC6519401 DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Heart ISSN: 2053-3624
Figure 1An outline of the study protocol. CAD, coronary artery disease; EF, ejection fraction; LV, left ventricle; PH, pulmonary hypertension; PMK, pacemaker; RV, right ventricle; SR, sinus rhythm.
General characteristics
| Male, n (total) | 8 (12) |
| Age (years) | 74±8 |
| BSA (m2) | 1.9±0.2 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 8 (8%) |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 2 (80%) |
| Dyslipidaemia, n (%) | 2 (20%) |
| NYHA functional class | 1 (1, 2) |
| Electrocardiography | |
| PR duration (ms) | 135 (130, 135) |
| QRS duration (ms) | 111 (104, 118) |
| Percentage of pacing (%) | 14±4 |
| Echocardiography | |
| LV end-diastolic volume indexed (mL/m2) | 67±11 |
| LV end-systolic volume indexed (mL/m2) | 28±6 |
| LV ejection fraction (%) | 58±6 |
| LAVi (mL/m2) | 32±14 |
| TAPSE (mm) | 22±2 |
| PAPs (mm Hg) | 36±7 |
| E/A ratio | 0.68±0.1 |
| E/e' ratio | 6.12±1.2 |
| Medications | |
| ARBs (%) | 7 (70) |
| Loop diuretics (%) | 1 (10) |
| Antiplatelet (%) | 8 (80) |
| Statins (%) | 2 (20) |
| Antidiabetic drugs (%) | 3 (30) |
Data are described as mean (±SD) or median (IQR) for quantitative variables, and counts (proportions) for categorical variables.
ARBs, angiotensin receptors blockers; BSA, body surface area; EF, ejection fraction; LAVi, left atrial volume index; LV, left ventricle; PAPs, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.
Echocardiographic and Echo-PIV differences according to pacing models
| Echocardiography | Sinus rhythm | RVA-pacing | P value |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 62±5 | 67±11 | 0.29 |
| LV end-diastolic volume (mL/m2) | 67±12 | 68±11 | 0.12 |
| LV end-systolic volume (mL/m2) | 28±6 | 29±6 | |
| LV ejection fraction (%) | 58±6 | 56±6 | |
| LV GLS (%) | 17±3.3 | 11±2.8 | |
| Echo-PIV | |||
| KE-dissipation, diastolic (mJ) | 8.35±6.7 | 11.26±8.7 | |
| KE-dissipation, systolic (mJ) | 7.11±3.5 | 9.43±5.3 | |
| Blood flow momentum (°) | 27.47±3.3 | 34.43±7.6 |
EF, ejection fraction; Echo-PIV, echocardiographic particle image velocimetry; GLS, global longitudinal strain; KE, kinetic energy; LV, left ventricle; RVA, right ventricular apical.
Figure 2GLS variations during sinus rhythm and RVA-pacing. GLS, global longitudinal strain; LV, left ventricle; PMK, pacemaker.
Figure 3Examples of Echo-PIV derived polar histograms during sinus rhythm and RVA-pacing. The directional distribution of global momentum during the entire heart cycle is summarised regarding a polar histograms. This polar image gives a synthetic picture of the overall haemodynamic velocities associated with intraventricular blood flow motion identifying whether they are aligned along the base-apex direction (left) or they develop non-physiological transversal components (right). The parameter ‘blood flow momentum’ indicates the dominant orientation of the haemodynamic velocities (diastole and systole). During RVA-pacing there is an irregular vortex formation with local stagnation resulting in transversal velocities forces and loss of the physiological longitudinal orientation of the intraventricular velocities. Echo-PIV, echocardiographic particle velocity imaging; RVA, right ventricular apical.
Figure 4Histograms of KE variations during sinus rhythm and RVA-pacing. KE, kinetic energy; PMK, pacemaker; RV, right ventricle.
Echo-PIV correlates of left ventricle GLS impairment
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||
| PMK-induced heart rate (bpm) | – | – | – | 0.26 | 0.59 to 1.14 | 0.31 |
| BFM absolute variation | 0.54 | 0.07 to 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.03 to 1.09 | ||
| Diastolic KE-dissipation (mJ) | 0.29 | 0.002 to 0.57 | 0.26 | 0.09 to 0.61 | 0.08 | |
| Systolic KE-dissipation (mJ) | 0.74 | 0.11 to 1.61 | 0.07 | 0.77 | 0.27 to 1.81 | 0.08 |
Multivariable linear regression models. Models were tested for BFM diastolic/systolic KE dissipation and LV end-systolic volume. Model 1 is non-adjusted. Model 2 was adjusted for PMK-induced heart rate.
BFM, blood flow momentum; Coeff., coefficient; Conf., confidence; Echo-PIV, echocardiographic particle image velocimetry; GLS, global longitudinal strain; KE, kinetic energy; LV, left ventricle; PMK, pacemaker; bpm, beats per minute.