Literature DB >> 31166593

Comparison of Costs of Radical Cystectomy vs Trimodal Therapy for Patients With Localized Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Stephen B Williams1, Yong Shan1, Mohamed D Ray-Zack1, Hogan K Hudgins1, Usama Jazzar1, Douglas S Tyler2, Stephen J Freedland3, Todd A Swanson4, Jacques G Baillargeon5, Jim C Hu6, Sapna Kaul7, Ashish M Kamat8, John L Gore9, Hemalkumar B Mehta2.   

Abstract

Importance: Earlier studies on the cost of muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatments lack granularity and are limited to 180 days. Objective: To compare the 1-year costs associated with trimodal therapy vs radical cystectomy, accounting for survival and intensity effects on total costs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study used the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database and included 2963 patients aged 66 to 85 years who had received a diagnosis of clinical stage T2 to T4a muscle-invasive bladder cancer from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2011. The data analysis was performed from March 5, 2018, through December 4, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Total Medicare costs within 1 year of diagnosis following radical cystectomy vs trimodal therapy were compared using inverse probability of treatment-weighted propensity score models that included a 2-part estimator to account for intrinsic selection bias.
Results: Of 2963 participants, 1030 (34.8%) were women, 2591 (87.4%) were white, 129 (4.4%) were African American, and 98 (3.3%) were Hispanic. Median costs were significantly higher for trimodal therapy than radical cystectomy in 90 days ($83 754 vs $68 692; median difference, $11 805; 95% CI, $7745-$15 864), 180 days ($187 162 vs $109 078; median difference, $62 370; 95% CI, $55 581-$69 160), and 365 days ($289 142 vs $148 757; median difference, $109 027; 95% CI, $98 692-$119 363), respectively. Outpatient care, radiology, medication expenses, and pathology/laboratory costs contributed largely to the higher costs associated with trimodal therapy. On inverse probability of treatment-weighted adjusted analyses, patients undergoing trimodal therapy had $136 935 (95% CI, $122 131-$152 115) higher mean costs compared with radical cystectomy 1 year after diagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with radical cystectomy, trimodal therapy was associated with higher costs among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The differences in costs were largely attributed to medication and radiology expenses associated with trimodal therapy. Extrapolating cost figures resulted in a nationwide excess spending of $468 million for trimodal therapy compared with radical cystectomy for patients who received a diagnosis of bladder cancer in 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31166593      PMCID: PMC6551585          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  34 in total

1.  Comparing Survival Outcomes and Costs Associated With Radical Cystectomy and Trimodal Therapy for Older Adults With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Yong Shan; Usama Jazzar; Hemalkumar B Mehta; Jacques G Baillargeon; Jinhai Huo; Anthony J Senagore; Eduardo Orihuela; Douglas S Tyler; Todd A Swanson; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Updating the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework: Revisions and Reflections in Response to Comments Received.

Authors:  Lowell E Schnipper; Nancy E Davidson; Dana S Wollins; Douglas W Blayney; Adam P Dicker; Patricia A Ganz; J Russell Hoverman; Robert Langdon; Gary H Lyman; Neal J Meropol; Therese Mulvey; Lee Newcomer; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Blase Polite; Derek Raghavan; Gregory Rossi; Leonard Saltz; Deborah Schrag; Thomas J Smith; Peter P Yu; Clifford A Hudis; Julie M Vose; Richard L Schilsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Radical cystectomy vs. chemoradiation in T2-4aN0M0 bladder cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  Ofer N Gofrit; Rony Nof; Amichai Meirovitz; Dov Pode; Stephen Frank; Ran Katz; Amos Shapiro; Ezekiel H Landau; Guy Hidas; Vladimir Yutkin; Mordechai Duvdevani; Mark Wygoda
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Cost implications of the rapid adoption of newer technologies for treating prostate cancer.

Authors:  Paul L Nguyen; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Toni K Choueiri; Wesley W Choi; Yin Lei; Karen E Hoffman; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Evaluation of North American Association of Central Cancer Registries' (NAACCR) data for use in population-based cancer survival studies.

Authors:  Hannah K Weir; Christopher J Johnson; Angela B Mariotto; Donna Turner; Reda J Wilson; Diane Nishri; Kevin C Ward
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2014-11

6.  Comparative Effectiveness of Trimodal Therapy Versus Radical Cystectomy for Localized Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder.

Authors:  Thomas Seisen; Maxine Sun; Stuart R Lipsitz; Firas Abdollah; Jeffrey J Leow; Mani Menon; Mark A Preston; Lauren C Harshman; Adam S Kibel; Paul L Nguyen; Joaquim Bellmunt; Toni K Choueiri; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Treatment of Non-Metastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO Guideline.

Authors:  Sam S Chang; Bernard H Bochner; Roger Chou; Robert Dreicer; Ashish M Kamat; Seth P Lerner; Yair Lotan; Joshua J Meeks; Jeff M Michalski; Todd M Morgan; Diane Z Quale; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Anthony L Zietman; Jeffrey M Holzbeierlein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Long-Term Outcomes Among Patients Who Achieve Complete or Near-Complete Responses After the Induction Phase of Bladder-Preserving Combined-Modality Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of NRG Oncology/RTOG 9906 and 0233.

Authors:  Timur Mitin; Asha George; Anthony L Zietman; Niall M Heney; Donald S Kaufman; Robert G Uzzo; Robert Dreicer; H James Wallace; Luis Souhami; M Chris Dobelbower; Howard M Sandler; William U Shipley
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Variations in the Costs of Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer in the USA.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Leow; Alexander P Cole; Thomas Seisen; Joaquim Bellmunt; Matthew Mossanen; Mani Menon; Mark A Preston; Toni K Choueiri; Adam S Kibel; Benjamin I Chung; Maxine Sun; Steven L Chang; Quoc-Dien Trinh
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  12 in total

1.  Preservation of the bladder, but at what cost?

Authors:  Niklas Harland; Arnulf Stenzl
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

2.  The perils of using registry data to compare the survival and cost of radical cystectomy and trimodality therapy in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Abhishek A Solanki; Stanley L Liauw
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

3.  Editorial comment: understanding the cost of bladder preservation in muscle invasive bladder cancer-an evaluation of radical cystectomy versus trimodal therapy costs.

Authors:  Diana E Magee; Girish S Kulkarni
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

4.  Trimodal therapy vs. radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A Canadian cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Ronald Kool; Ivan Yanev; Tarek Hijal; Marie Vanhuyse; Fabio L Cury; Luis Souhami; Wassim Kassouf; Alice Dragomir
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.052

5.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition vs. cisplatin-based chemotherapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ali Raza Khaki; Yong Shan; Richard E Nelson; Sapna Kaul; John L Gore; Petros Grivas; Stephen B Williams
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.954

Review 6.  Bladder-sparing protocols in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Côme Tholomier; Luis Souhami; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

7.  Estimated Costs and Long-term Outcomes of Patients With High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated With Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in the Veterans Affairs Health System.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Lauren E Howard; Meagan L Foster; Zachary Klaassen; Jan Sieluk; Amanda M De Hoedt; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

8.  Management, Surveillance Patterns, and Costs Associated With Low-Grade Papillary Stage Ta Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Among Older Adults, 2004-2013.

Authors:  Kelly K Bree; Yong Shan; Patrick J Hensley; Niyati Lobo; Chengrui Hu; Douglas S Tyler; Karim Chamie; Ashish M Kamat; Stephen B Williams
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-03-01

Review 9.  Trimodality Therapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Recent Advances and Unanswered Questions.

Authors:  Di Maria Jiang; Peter Chung; Girish S Kulkarni; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Incidence and outcome of salvage cystectomy after bladder sparing therapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Victor M Schuettfort; Benjamin Pradere; Fahad Quhal; Hadi Mostafaei; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Keiichiro Mori; Reza Sari Motlagh; Margit Fisch; David D'Andrea; Michael Rink; Paolo Gontero; Francesco Soria; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.