Stephen B Williams1, Yong Shan1, Mohamed D Ray-Zack1, Hogan K Hudgins1, Usama Jazzar1, Douglas S Tyler2, Stephen J Freedland3, Todd A Swanson4, Jacques G Baillargeon5, Jim C Hu6, Sapna Kaul7, Ashish M Kamat8, John L Gore9, Hemalkumar B Mehta2. 1. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston. 2. Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston. 3. Department of Urology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston. 5. Sealy Center on Aging, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston. 6. Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York. 7. Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston. 8. Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. 9. Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Abstract
Importance: Earlier studies on the cost of muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatments lack granularity and are limited to 180 days. Objective: To compare the 1-year costs associated with trimodal therapy vs radical cystectomy, accounting for survival and intensity effects on total costs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study used the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database and included 2963 patients aged 66 to 85 years who had received a diagnosis of clinical stage T2 to T4a muscle-invasive bladder cancer from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2011. The data analysis was performed from March 5, 2018, through December 4, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Total Medicare costs within 1 year of diagnosis following radical cystectomy vs trimodal therapy were compared using inverse probability of treatment-weighted propensity score models that included a 2-part estimator to account for intrinsic selection bias. Results: Of 2963 participants, 1030 (34.8%) were women, 2591 (87.4%) were white, 129 (4.4%) were African American, and 98 (3.3%) were Hispanic. Median costs were significantly higher for trimodal therapy than radical cystectomy in 90 days ($83 754 vs $68 692; median difference, $11 805; 95% CI, $7745-$15 864), 180 days ($187 162 vs $109 078; median difference, $62 370; 95% CI, $55 581-$69 160), and 365 days ($289 142 vs $148 757; median difference, $109 027; 95% CI, $98 692-$119 363), respectively. Outpatient care, radiology, medication expenses, and pathology/laboratory costs contributed largely to the higher costs associated with trimodal therapy. On inverse probability of treatment-weighted adjusted analyses, patients undergoing trimodal therapy had $136 935 (95% CI, $122 131-$152 115) higher mean costs compared with radical cystectomy 1 year after diagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with radical cystectomy, trimodal therapy was associated with higher costs among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The differences in costs were largely attributed to medication and radiology expenses associated with trimodal therapy. Extrapolating cost figures resulted in a nationwide excess spending of $468 million for trimodal therapy compared with radical cystectomy for patients who received a diagnosis of bladder cancer in 2017.
Importance: Earlier studies on the cost of muscle-invasive bladder cancer treatments lack granularity and are limited to 180 days. Objective: To compare the 1-year costs associated with trimodal therapy vs radical cystectomy, accounting for survival and intensity effects on total costs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study used the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database and included 2963 patients aged 66 to 85 years who had received a diagnosis of clinical stage T2 to T4amuscle-invasive bladder cancer from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2011. The data analysis was performed from March 5, 2018, through December 4, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Total Medicare costs within 1 year of diagnosis following radical cystectomy vs trimodal therapy were compared using inverse probability of treatment-weighted propensity score models that included a 2-part estimator to account for intrinsic selection bias. Results: Of 2963 participants, 1030 (34.8%) were women, 2591 (87.4%) were white, 129 (4.4%) were African American, and 98 (3.3%) were Hispanic. Median costs were significantly higher for trimodal therapy than radical cystectomy in 90 days ($83 754 vs $68 692; median difference, $11 805; 95% CI, $7745-$15 864), 180 days ($187 162 vs $109 078; median difference, $62 370; 95% CI, $55 581-$69 160), and 365 days ($289 142 vs $148 757; median difference, $109 027; 95% CI, $98 692-$119 363), respectively. Outpatient care, radiology, medication expenses, and pathology/laboratory costs contributed largely to the higher costs associated with trimodal therapy. On inverse probability of treatment-weighted adjusted analyses, patients undergoing trimodal therapy had $136 935 (95% CI, $122 131-$152 115) higher mean costs compared with radical cystectomy 1 year after diagnosis. Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with radical cystectomy, trimodal therapy was associated with higher costs among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The differences in costs were largely attributed to medication and radiology expenses associated with trimodal therapy. Extrapolating cost figures resulted in a nationwide excess spending of $468 million for trimodal therapy compared with radical cystectomy for patients who received a diagnosis of bladder cancer in 2017.
Authors: Stephen B Williams; Yong Shan; Usama Jazzar; Hemalkumar B Mehta; Jacques G Baillargeon; Jinhai Huo; Anthony J Senagore; Eduardo Orihuela; Douglas S Tyler; Todd A Swanson; Ashish M Kamat Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Lowell E Schnipper; Nancy E Davidson; Dana S Wollins; Douglas W Blayney; Adam P Dicker; Patricia A Ganz; J Russell Hoverman; Robert Langdon; Gary H Lyman; Neal J Meropol; Therese Mulvey; Lee Newcomer; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Blase Polite; Derek Raghavan; Gregory Rossi; Leonard Saltz; Deborah Schrag; Thomas J Smith; Peter P Yu; Clifford A Hudis; Julie M Vose; Richard L Schilsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ofer N Gofrit; Rony Nof; Amichai Meirovitz; Dov Pode; Stephen Frank; Ran Katz; Amos Shapiro; Ezekiel H Landau; Guy Hidas; Vladimir Yutkin; Mordechai Duvdevani; Mark Wygoda Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Paul L Nguyen; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Toni K Choueiri; Wesley W Choi; Yin Lei; Karen E Hoffman; Jim C Hu Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-03-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hannah K Weir; Christopher J Johnson; Angela B Mariotto; Donna Turner; Reda J Wilson; Diane Nishri; Kevin C Ward Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 2014-11
Authors: Thomas Seisen; Maxine Sun; Stuart R Lipsitz; Firas Abdollah; Jeffrey J Leow; Mani Menon; Mark A Preston; Lauren C Harshman; Adam S Kibel; Paul L Nguyen; Joaquim Bellmunt; Toni K Choueiri; Quoc-Dien Trinh Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2017-04-12 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Sam S Chang; Bernard H Bochner; Roger Chou; Robert Dreicer; Ashish M Kamat; Seth P Lerner; Yair Lotan; Joshua J Meeks; Jeff M Michalski; Todd M Morgan; Diane Z Quale; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Anthony L Zietman; Jeffrey M Holzbeierlein Journal: J Urol Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Timur Mitin; Asha George; Anthony L Zietman; Niall M Heney; Donald S Kaufman; Robert G Uzzo; Robert Dreicer; H James Wallace; Luis Souhami; M Chris Dobelbower; Howard M Sandler; William U Shipley Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jeffrey J Leow; Alexander P Cole; Thomas Seisen; Joaquim Bellmunt; Matthew Mossanen; Mani Menon; Mark A Preston; Toni K Choueiri; Adam S Kibel; Benjamin I Chung; Maxine Sun; Steven L Chang; Quoc-Dien Trinh Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2017-08-10 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Ronald Kool; Ivan Yanev; Tarek Hijal; Marie Vanhuyse; Fabio L Cury; Luis Souhami; Wassim Kassouf; Alice Dragomir Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 2.052
Authors: Ali Raza Khaki; Yong Shan; Richard E Nelson; Sapna Kaul; John L Gore; Petros Grivas; Stephen B Williams Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 2.954
Authors: Stephen B Williams; Lauren E Howard; Meagan L Foster; Zachary Klaassen; Jan Sieluk; Amanda M De Hoedt; Stephen J Freedland Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-03-01
Authors: Kelly K Bree; Yong Shan; Patrick J Hensley; Niyati Lobo; Chengrui Hu; Douglas S Tyler; Karim Chamie; Ashish M Kamat; Stephen B Williams Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-03-01
Authors: Victor M Schuettfort; Benjamin Pradere; Fahad Quhal; Hadi Mostafaei; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Keiichiro Mori; Reza Sari Motlagh; Margit Fisch; David D'Andrea; Michael Rink; Paolo Gontero; Francesco Soria; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 4.226