Literature DB >> 29955780

Comparing Survival Outcomes and Costs Associated With Radical Cystectomy and Trimodal Therapy for Older Adults With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Stephen B Williams1, Yong Shan1, Usama Jazzar1, Hemalkumar B Mehta2, Jacques G Baillargeon3, Jinhai Huo4, Anthony J Senagore2, Eduardo Orihuela1, Douglas S Tyler2, Todd A Swanson5, Ashish M Kamat6.   

Abstract

Importance: Radical cystectomy is the guidelines-recommended treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer, but a resurgence of trimodal therapy has occurred. Limited comparative data are available on outcomes and costs attributable to these 2 treatments. Objective: To compare the survival outcomes and costs between trimodal therapy and radical cystectomy in older adults with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based cohort study used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database. A total of 3200 older adults (aged ≥66 years) with clinical stage T2 to T4a bladder cancer diagnosed from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2011, and with claims data available through December 31, 2013, were included in the analysis. Patients who received radical cystectomy underwent either only surgery or surgery in combination with radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Patients who received trimodal therapy underwent transurethral resection of the bladder followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Propensity score matching by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics was used. Data analysis was performed from August 1, 2017, to March 11, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival and cancer-specific survival were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards regression model and the Fine and Gray competing risk model. All Medicare health care costs for inpatient, outpatient, and physician services within 30, 90, and 180 days of treatment were compared. The total amount spent nationwide was estimated, using 180-day medical costs between treatments, by the total number of new cases of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the United States in 2011.
Results: Of the 3200 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 2048 (64.0%) were men and 1152 (36.0%) were women, with a mean (SD) age of 75.8 (6.0) years. After propensity score matching, 687 patients (21.5%) underwent trimodal therapy and 687 patients (21.5%) underwent radical cystectomy. Patients who underwent trimodal therapy had significantly decreased overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.31-1.69) and cancer-specific survival (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.32-1.83). No differences in costs at 30 days were observed between trimodal therapy ($15 233 in 2002 vs $18 743 in 2011) and radical cystectomy ($17 990 in 2002 vs $21 738 in 2011). However, median total costs were significantly higher with trimodal therapy than with radical cystectomy at 90 days ($80 174 vs $69 181; median difference, $8964; Hodges-Lehmann 95% CI, $3848-$14 079) and at 180 days ($179 891 vs $107 017; median difference, $63 771; Hodges-Lehmann 95% CI, $55 512-$72 029). Extrapolating these figures to the total US population revealed $335 million in excess spending for trimodal therapy compared with the less costly radical cystectomy ($492 million) for patients who received a muscle-invasive bladder cancer diagnosis in 2011. Conclusions and Relevance: Trimodal therapy was associated with significantly decreased overall survival and cancer-specific survival as well as $335 million in excess spending in 2011. These findings have important health policy implications regarding the appropriate use of high value-based care among older adults with invasive bladder cancer who are candidates for either radical cystectomy or trimodal therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29955780      PMCID: PMC6584312          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  34 in total

1.  Relationship of the number of removed lymph nodes to bladder cancer and competing mortality after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Michael Froehner; Vladimir Novotny; Ulrike Heberling; Lydia Rutsch; Rainer J Litz; Matthias Hübler; Rainer Koch; Gustavo B Baretton; Manfred P Wirth
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Treatment of Nonmetastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: American Urological Association/American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Society for Radiation Oncology/Society of Urologic Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Summary.

Authors:  Sam S Chang; Bernard H Bochner; Roger Chou; Robert Dreicer; Ashish M Kamat; Seth P Lerner; Yair Lotan; Joshua J Meeks; Jeff M Michalski; Todd M Morgan; Diane Z Quale; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Anthony L Zietman; Jeffrey M Holzbeierlein
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Trimodal Therapy is Inferior to Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer using Population-level Data: Is There Evidence in the (Lack of) Details?

Authors:  Girish S Kulkarni; Zachary Klaassen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Underutilization of Radical Cystectomy Among Patients Diagnosed with Clinical Stage T2 Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Jinhai Huo; Karim Chamie; Jim C Hu; Sharon H Giordano; Karen E Hoffman; Colin P N Dinney; Ashish M Kamat; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2016-05-13

5.  Participation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Joy H Lewis; Meredith L Kilgore; Dana P Goldman; Edward L Trimble; Richard Kaplan; Michael J Montello; Michael G Housman; José J Escarce
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Contemporary use trends and survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy or bladder-preservation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  David B Cahn; Elizabeth A Handorf; Eric M Ghiraldi; Benjamin T Ristau; Daniel M Geynisman; Thomas M Churilla; Eric M Horwitz; Mark L Sobczak; David Y T Chen; Rosalia Viterbo; Richard E Greenberg; Alexander Kutikov; Robert G Uzzo; Marc C Smaldone
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Trimodal Therapy in the Setting of a Multidisciplinary Bladder Cancer Clinic.

Authors:  Girish S Kulkarni; Thomas Hermanns; Yanliang Wei; Bimal Bhindi; Raj Satkunasivam; Paul Athanasopoulos; Peter J Bostrom; Cynthia Kuk; Kathy Li; Arnoud J Templeton; Srikala S Sridhar; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Peter Chung; Robert G Bristow; Michael Milosevic; Padraig Warde; Neil E Fleshner; Michael A S Jewett; Shaheena Bashir; Alexandre R Zlotta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Treatment of Non-Metastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO Guideline.

Authors:  Sam S Chang; Bernard H Bochner; Roger Chou; Robert Dreicer; Ashish M Kamat; Seth P Lerner; Yair Lotan; Joshua J Meeks; Jeff M Michalski; Todd M Morgan; Diane Z Quale; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Anthony L Zietman; Jeffrey M Holzbeierlein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Anticipating the effects of accountable care organizations for inpatient surgery.

Authors:  David C Miller; Zaojun Ye; Cathryn Gust; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 10.  ICUD-EAU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2012: Radical cystectomy and bladder preservation for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Georgios Gakis; Jason Efstathiou; Seth P Lerner; Michael S Cookson; Kirk A Keegan; Khurshid A Guru; William U Shipley; Axel Heidenreich; Mark P Schoenberg; Arthur I Sagaloswky; Mark S Soloway; Arnulf Stenzl
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 20.096

View more
  22 in total

1.  Long term oncologic outcome in patients with bladder cancer after radical cystectomy: Impact of carcinoma in situ in the era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Erfan Amini; Nariman Ahmadi; Thomas G Clifford; Cory M Hugen; Soroush T Bazargani; Jie Cai; Gus Miranda; Andy E Sherrod; Siamak Daneshmand; Hooman Djaladat
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Trimodality therapy for bladder cancer: modern management and future directions.

Authors:  Anthony Pham; Leslie K Ballas
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 3.  Bladder Cancer Survivorship.

Authors:  Sumeet K Bhanvadia
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Editorial comment: understanding the cost of bladder preservation in muscle invasive bladder cancer-an evaluation of radical cystectomy versus trimodal therapy costs.

Authors:  Diana E Magee; Girish S Kulkarni
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

5.  Comparison of Costs of Radical Cystectomy vs Trimodal Therapy for Patients With Localized Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Yong Shan; Mohamed D Ray-Zack; Hogan K Hudgins; Usama Jazzar; Douglas S Tyler; Stephen J Freedland; Todd A Swanson; Jacques G Baillargeon; Jim C Hu; Sapna Kaul; Ashish M Kamat; John L Gore; Hemalkumar B Mehta
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Effect of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion vs Open Radical Cystectomy on 90-Day Morbidity and Mortality Among Patients With Bladder Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  James W F Catto; Pramit Khetrapal; Federico Ricciardi; Gareth Ambler; Norman R Williams; Tarek Al-Hammouri; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Ramesh Thurairaja; Rajesh Nair; Andrew Feber; Simon Dixon; Senthil Nathan; Tim Briggs; Ashwin Sridhar; Imran Ahmad; Jaimin Bhatt; Philip Charlesworth; Christopher Blick; Marcus G Cumberbatch; Syed A Hussain; Sanjeev Kotwal; Anthony Koupparis; John McGrath; Aidan P Noon; Edward Rowe; Nikhil Vasdev; Vishwanath Hanchanale; Daryl Hagan; Chris Brew-Graves; John D Kelly
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 157.335

7.  MiR-7-5p suppresses invasion via downregulation of the autophagy-related gene ATG7 and increases chemoresistance to cisplatin in BCa.

Authors:  Chong Wang; Zhao Tang; Ze Zhang; Tiantian Liu; Jingwei Zhang; Houbao Huang; Yawei Li
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 6.832

8.  Trimodal therapy vs. radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A Canadian cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Ronald Kool; Ivan Yanev; Tarek Hijal; Marie Vanhuyse; Fabio L Cury; Luis Souhami; Wassim Kassouf; Alice Dragomir
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 2.052

9.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition vs. cisplatin-based chemotherapy in muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ali Raza Khaki; Yong Shan; Richard E Nelson; Sapna Kaul; John L Gore; Petros Grivas; Stephen B Williams
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.954

10.  Editorial comment: bladder preservation as a treatment strategy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Khaled Ajib; Girish S Kulkarni
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.