T W Kim1, S M Son2, J S Lee3. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bonebarum Hospital, Yangsan, Korea (Republic of). 2. BioMedical Research Institute, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea (Republic of). 3. BioMedical Research Institute, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, 179 Gudeok-Ro, Seo-Gu, 49241, Busan, Korea (Republic of). jungsublee@pusan.ac.kr.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to compare demographic characteristics, disease activity, functional status, and quality of life between ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with neuropatic pain (NP) and AS without NP (Non-NP). METHODS: The MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase database, from the earliest available date of indexing through December 20, 2018, were searched for comparative studies evaluating NP in AS patients. Two authors performed the data extraction independently. Any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: Four comparative studies were identified. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of age, body mass index, symptom duration, and inflammatory markers, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C‑reactive protein between NP and Non-NP. The sex ratios (F/M) were approximately 1/1 in NP and 1/2 in Non-NP and the proportion of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) B27-positive patients in NP and Non-NP was 65.7% and 83.0%, respectively. NP patients had significantly higher visual analogue scale pain scores, higher Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, higher Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, and lower SF-Item Short Form physical component scores compare to Non-NP patients. CONCLUSION: The current meta-analysis showed that NP patients had significantly higher pain severity, higher disease activity and lower quality of life than Non-NP patients. The sex ratio (F/M) and proportion of HLA-B27 positive patients were different between the two groups. Further well-designed studies are needed to substantiate our results.
AIM: The aim of this study was to compare demographic characteristics, disease activity, functional status, and quality of life between ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with neuropatic pain (NP) and AS without NP (Non-NP). METHODS: The MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Embase database, from the earliest available date of indexing through December 20, 2018, were searched for comparative studies evaluating NP in AS patients. Two authors performed the data extraction independently. Any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. RESULTS: Four comparative studies were identified. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of age, body mass index, symptom duration, and inflammatory markers, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C‑reactive protein between NP and Non-NP. The sex ratios (F/M) were approximately 1/1 in NP and 1/2 in Non-NP and the proportion of humanleukocyte antigen (HLA) B27-positive patients in NP and Non-NP was 65.7% and 83.0%, respectively. NP patients had significantly higher visual analogue scale pain scores, higher Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, higher Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index, and lower SF-Item Short Form physical component scores compare to Non-NP patients. CONCLUSION: The current meta-analysis showed that NP patients had significantly higher pain severity, higher disease activity and lower quality of life than Non-NP patients. The sex ratio (F/M) and proportion of HLA-B27 positive patients were different between the two groups. Further well-designed studies are needed to substantiate our results.
Entities:
Keywords:
Ankylosing spondylitis; Disease activity; Meta-analysis; Neuropathic pain; Quality of life
Authors: Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Regina Kunz; Jan Brozek; Pablo Alonso-Coello; David Rind; P J Devereaux; Victor M Montori; Bo Freyschuss; Gunn Vist; Roman Jaeschke; John W Williams; Mohammad Hassan Murad; David Sinclair; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Joerg Meerpohl; Craig Whittington; Kristian Thorlund; Jeff Andrews; Holger J Schünemann Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2011-08-11 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: R-D Treede; T S Jensen; J N Campbell; G Cruccu; J O Dostrovsky; J W Griffin; P Hansson; R Hughes; T Nurmikko; J Serra Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-11-14 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: S Rifbjerg-Madsen; A W Christensen; R Christensen; M L Hetland; H Bliddal; L E Kristensen; B Danneskiold-Samsøe; K Amris Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-07 Impact factor: 3.240