| Literature DB >> 31165474 |
Olivia Hicks1, Jonathan A Green1, Francis Daunt2, Emma J A Cunningham3, Mark Newell2, Adam Butler4, Sarah J Burthe2.
Abstract
Parasites are a major component of all animal populations. Males and females often differ in their levels of parasite prevalence, potentially leading to sex differences in the impact of parasitism on fitness, with important implications for the evolution of parasite and host traits including resistance, tolerance, and virulence. However, quantitative measures of the impact of parasitism under free-living conditions are extremely rare, as they require detailed host demographic data with measures of parasite burden over time. Here, we use endoscopy for direct quantification of natural-parasite burdens and relate these to reproductive success over 7 yr in a wild population of seabirds. Contrary to predictions, only female burdens were associated with negative impacts of parasitism on breeding success, despite males having significantly higher burdens. Female reproductive success declined by 30% across the range of natural parasite burdens. These effects persisted when accounting for interannual population differences in breeding success. Our results provide quantitative estimates of profound sub-lethal effects of parasitism on the population. Importantly, they highlight how parasites act unpredictably to shape ecological and evolutionary processes in different components of the same population, with implications for demography and selection on host and parasite traits.Entities:
Keywords: breeding success; endoparasites; fitness; life history; macroparasites; maternal; nematodes; parasitism; paternal; reproduction; sex differences; trade-off
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31165474 PMCID: PMC6851849 DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2772
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecology ISSN: 0012-9658 Impact factor: 5.499
Figure 1The effect of parasite load on breeding success (number of chicks raised per nest) in female European shags. Lines represent predicted lines from the best supported model (solid lines). Gray lines represent the predicted lines for each year of the study, which vary in the mean population productivity (a proxy for environmental conditions). The black line represents the predicted line under the mean environmental conditions with 95% confidence intervals (dashed). Points are shaded based on density for ease of interpretation of the underlying data.
The relationship between breeding success, parasite load, and extrinsic variables in female European shags
| Explanatory variable |
| Effect size | ±SE | Question |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parasite load |
| −0.22 | 0.11 | Q1 |
| Parasite load |
| −0.23 | 0.10 | Q3 |
| Parasite load × mean productivity | 0.30 | 0.12 | 0.12 | |
| Parasite load × lag prod | 0.93 | 0.03 | 0.10 | |
| Parasite load × lay date | 0.28 | −0.16 | 0.12 | |
| Parasite load × age | 0.45 | −0.08 | 0.11 | |
| Parasite load × age2 | 0.67 | 0.05 | 0.09 |
Models predicting individual‐level breeding success (number of chicks fledged per nest), with response variables parasite load, mean population productivity, mean lag population productivity, mean lay date, and adult age, and the interactions between these variables and parasite load. Estimates from generalized linear mixed models of effect sizes and estimates are presented for all effects. P values were calculated using likelihood‐ratio tests. Statistically significant terms are indicated in bold.
The relationship between breeding success, parasite load, and extrinsic variables in male European shags
| Explanatory variable |
| Effect size | ±SE | Question |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parasite load | 0.70 | −0.04 | 0.11 | Q1 |
| Parasite load | 0.44 | −0.08 | 0.11 | Q3 |
| Parasite load × mean productivity | 0.22 | −0.13 | 0.11 | |
| Parasite load × lag prod | 0.86 | 0.02 | 0.10 | |
| Parasite load × lay date | 0.79 | 0.03 | 0.10 | |
| Parasite load × age | 0.56 | −0.07 | 0.11 | |
| Parasite load × age2 | 0.82 | −0.04 | 0.16 |
Models predicting individual‐level breeding success (number of chicks fledged per nest), with response variables parasite load, mean population productivity, mean lag population productivity, mean lay date, and adult age, and the interactions between these variables and parasite load. Estimates from general linear mixed models of effect sizes and estimates are presented for all effects. P values presented were calculated from likelihood‐ratio tests between models with and without the term of interest.