| Literature DB >> 31164661 |
Hong Ji1,2, Weiqiu Huang3,4, Zhixiang Xing5, Jiaqi Zuo5, Zhuang Wang5, Ke Yang6.
Abstract
The MSWI fly ash which contains a large number of heavy metal substances is a subsidiary product of waste incineration power generation technology. If the MSWI fly ash is disposed improperly, heavy metal pollutants will pose a great threat to environmental safety and human health. Based on the technology of electrokinetic remediation, the feasibility of removing heavy metal pollutants from the MSWI fly ash using a modified electrokinetic remediation device - cylinder device was evaluated in this study. Differing from the traditional cuboid device with the volume ratio of the cathode chamber to the anode chamber being 1:1, the volume ratio of the cathode chamber to the anode chamber of the cylinder device was 16:1. Changes in parameters, such as pH values and conductivity in the cathode and the anode chambers as well as current and voltage in the sample area were analysed under the voltage gradient of 2 V/cm. After the experiment, the average removal efficiencies for Zn, Pb, Cd and Cu in the sample area were 53.2%, 31.4%, 42.3% and 30.7%, respectively. It indicates that the cylinder device is effective in removing heavy metals from the MSWI fly ash. Adopting the cylinder device for the experimental study on the electrokinetic remediation technology could provide a better way of thinking for the future engineering practices and applications.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31164661 PMCID: PMC6547674 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-43844-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Elements in the MSWI fly ash (%).
| Ca | O | Cl | Na |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29.8876 | 25.7237 | 15.2524 | 6.2318 |
| K | S | Mg | Fe |
| 5.8660 | 3.5988 | 1.8704 | 2.1669 |
| Zn | P | Ti | Pb |
| 0.6402 | 0.8306 | 0.6209 | 0.2038 |
| Cu | Br | Sr | Mn |
| 0.0805 | 0.0744 | 0.0744 | 0.0053 |
| Si | Al | Cd | |
| 4.9959 | 1.6531 | 0.1183 |
Figure 1The MSWI fly ash in scanning electron microscope.
Figure 2Electrokinetic remediation experimental set-up.
Electrokinetic remediation experimental parameters.
| Electrode Distance(cm) | Voltage(V) | Voltage gradient(v/cm) | Moisture Content(%) | Time(d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 12 | 2 | 100 | 15 |
Experimental parameters of leaching toxicity identification.
| Experiment method | Leaching agent | Liquid-solid ratio (L/Kg) | Rotational Speed (r/min) | Temperature (0C) | Oscillation time (h) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HJ/T300-2007 | Acetic acid buffer solution | 20:1 | 30 ± 2 | 23 ± 2 | 18 ± 2 |
Figure 3Changes in pH values of electrolyte solution in anode chamber and cathode chamber.
Figure 4Changes in conductivity of electrolyte solution in the anode chamber and the cathode chamber with time.
Figure 5Changes in current in the sample area over time.
Figure 6Changes of voltage in each section of the sample area over time.
Figure 7The ratio of the leaching concentration of heavy metals after electrokinetic remediation experiment to the leaching concentration of heavy metals in the original fly ash.