Literature DB >> 30055065

Sex-biased gene expression, sexual antagonism and levels of genetic diversity in the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis) genome.

Ludovic Dutoit1, Carina F Mugal1, Paulina Bolívar1, Mi Wang1, Krystyna Nadachowska-Brzyska1, Linnéa Smeds1, Homa P Yazdi1, Lars Gustafsson2, Hans Ellegren1.   

Abstract

Theoretical work suggests that sexual conflict should promote the maintenance of genetic diversity by the opposing directions of selection on males and females. If such conflict is pervasive, it could potentially lead to genomic heterogeneity in levels of genetic diversity an idea that so far has not been empirically tested on a genomewide scale. We used large-scale population genomic and transcriptomic data from the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis) to analyse how sexual conflict, for which we use sex-biased gene expression as a proxy, relates to genetic variability. Here, we demonstrate that the extent of sex-biased gene expression of both male-biased and female-biased genes is significantly correlated with levels of nucleotide diversity in gene sequences and that this correlation extends to diversity levels also in intergenic DNA and introns. We find signatures of balancing selection in sex-biased genes but also note that relaxed purifying selection could potentially explain part of the observed patterns. The finding of significant genetic differentiation between males and females for male-biased (and gonad-specific) genes indicates ongoing sexual conflict and sex-specific viability selection, potentially driven by sexual selection. Our results thus indicate that sexual antagonism could potentially be considered as one viable explanation to the long-standing question in evolutionary biology of how genomes can remain so genetically variable in face of strong natural and sexual selection.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  balancing selection; birds; sex-biased gene expression; sexual antagonism; transcriptomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30055065     DOI: 10.1111/mec.14789

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  15 in total

1.  Sexual antagonism drives the displacement of polymorphism across gene regulatory cascades.

Authors:  Mark S Hill; Max Reuter; Alexander J Stewart
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The genomic footprint of sexual conflict.

Authors:  Ahmed Sayadi; Alvaro Martinez Barrio; Elina Immonen; Jacques Dainat; David Berger; Christian Tellgren-Roth; Björn Nystedt; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Is the X chromosome a hot spot for sexually antagonistic polymorphisms? Biases in current empirical tests of classical theory.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Genome-wide sexually antagonistic variants reveal long-standing constraints on sexual dimorphism in fruit flies.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Mark S Hill; Tanya M Pennell; Ilona Flis; Fiona C Ingleby; Richard Mott; Kevin Fowler; Edward H Morrow; Max Reuter
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Phenotypic sexual dimorphism is associated with genomic signatures of resolved sexual conflict.

Authors:  Alison E Wright; Thea F Rogers; Matteo Fumagalli; Christopher R Cooney; Judith E Mank
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Limits to Genomic Divergence Under Sexually Antagonistic Selection.

Authors:  Katja R Kasimatis; Peter L Ralph; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Evaluating human autosomal loci for sexually antagonistic viability selection in two large biobanks.

Authors:  Katja R Kasimatis; Abin Abraham; Peter L Ralph; Andrew D Kern; John A Capra; Patrick C Phillips
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The signal of sex-specific selection in humans is not an artefact: Reply to Mank et al.

Authors:  Changde Cheng; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Differential gene expression patterns during gametophyte development provide insights into sex differentiation in the dioicous kelp Saccharina japonica.

Authors:  Jiaxun Zhang; Yan Li; Shiju Luo; Min Cao; Linan Zhang; Xiaojie Li
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Genotype-environment interaction and the maintenance of genetic variation: an empirical study of Lobelia inflata (Campanulaceae).

Authors:  Kristen Côté; Andrew M Simons
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.