| Literature DB >> 31160610 |
Paulin N Essone1,2, Marielle Leboueny1, Anicet Christel Maloupazoa Siawaya1, Amel Kévin Alame-Emane1,3, Oriane Cordelia Aboumegone Biyogo1, Patrice Hemery Dapnet Tadatsin3, Amandine Mveang Nzoghe1, Dimitri Ulrich Essamazokou4, Ofilia Mvoundza Ndjindji1, Guy-Stéphane Padzys4, Selidji Todagbe Agnandji2,5, Howard Takiff6, Brigitte Gicquel3,7, Joel Fleury Djoba Siawaya8.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death due to an infectious agent, but only a small fraction of those infected develop the disease. Cytokines are involved in the mediation and regulation of immunity, and their secretion patterns may reflect the infection status. To increase our understanding of immune response to M. tuberculosis infection, we conducted a cross-sectional study investigating M. tuberculosis infection status and comparing the release profiles of cytokines GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-10, IL-12 (p70), IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, in community controls (CCs) and healthy healthcare workers (HCWs) highly exposed to TB. Among HCWs and CCs, the probability of latent M. tuberculosis (LTB+) infection was respectively 5.4 (p = 0.002) and 3.4 (p = 0.006) times higher in men than women. The odds ratio of LTB infection was 4 times higher among HCWs in direct contact with active TB patients than other HCW (p = 0.01). Whole blood supernatant cytokine responses to M. tuberculosis antigens showed differential pro-inflammatory responses between HCWs and CCs. CCsLTB- had higher IL-1β responses than HCWsLTB- (p = 0.002). HCWsLTB+ had significantly higher IL-8 responses to M. tuberculosis antigens than HCWsLTB- (p = 0.003) and CCsLTB- (p = 0.015). HCWsLTB+/- showed weak but positive TNF-α responses to M. tuberculosis antigen stimulation compared to CCsLTB+/- (p ≤ 0.015). Looking at T-helper (1 and 2) responses, HCWsLTB+ and CCsLTB+ had significantly higher IFN-γ and IL-2 responses compared to HCWsLTB- and CCsLTB- (p < [0.0001-0.003]). Also, TB antigen induced IL-5 secretion was significantly higher in HCWsLTB+ and CCsLTB+ than in non-infected CCsLTB- (p < [0.005-0.04]). M. tuberculosis antigen specific responses in HCWsLTB+ varied based on active TB exposure gradient. HCWsLTB+ who were highly exposed to active TB (≥3 hours per day) had significantly higher IFN-γ and IL-8 responses (p ≤ 0.02) than HCWs LTB+ not in direct contact with active TB patients. HCWsLTB+ working with active TB patients for 5 to 31 years had a significantly enhanced secretion of proinflammatory cytokines (GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12p70, TNF-α) compared to HCWsLTB- (p < [0.0001-0.01]). Secretion of anti-inflammatory/Th2 cytokines IL-5 and IL-10 was also higher in HCWsLTB+ than HCWsLTB-. In conclusion, LTBI individuals controlling the M. tuberculosis infection have an enhanced TB specific Th1-cytokines/proinflammatory response combined with selected Th2 type/anti-inflammatory cytokines induction.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31160610 PMCID: PMC6547719 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44294-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of the studied populations, rate and odds of latent TB infection.
| Variables | Healthcare workers | Community Controls | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| All | 75 (100) | 24 (32) | 93 (100) | 29 (31) | ||
|
| ||||||
| Female | 58 (77) | 13 (22) | 0.16/0.3 [0,001] as compared with male | 62 (67) | 15 (24) | 0.29/0.43 [0,006] as compared with female |
| Male | 17 (23) | 11 (65) | 6/3 [0,001] as compared with female | 31 (33) | 14 (45) | 3.4/2.3 [0,006] as compared with female |
|
| ||||||
| <35 years | 19 (25.3) | 6 (30) | 1/1 [0.95] as compared with the rest of participant | 49 (53) | 16 (33) | 1.16/1.1 [0.75] as compared with the rest of participant |
| 35–45 years | 34 (42.3) | 32 (11) | 1/1 [0.95] as compared with the rest of participant | 18 (19) | 7 (39) | 1.5/1.3 [0.43] as compared with the rest of participant |
| ≥45 years | 22 (29.3) | 32 (7) | 1/1 [1] as compared with the rest of participant | 26 (28) | 6 (23) | 0.57/0.67 [0.29] as compared with the rest of participant |
|
| ||||||
| Median BMI (Min - Max) | 27 (16–44) | 26 (18–40) | — | 25 (16–42) | 25 (19–44) | — |
| Percentile [25%- 75%] | [24–32] | [22–34] | — | [22–29] | [22–28] | — |
| Female | 30 (16–42) | 31 (18–40) | 25.4 (19–44) | 24 (21–38.5) | ||
| Male | 24 (19–43) | 23 (19–29) | 25.5 (17–42) | 25 (17–31) | ||
|
| ||||||
| Administration | 10 (13) | 1 (10) | 0.2/0.3 [0.16] | — | — | — |
| Laboratory technicians | 12 (16) | 2 (25) | 0.7/0.75 [0.74] as compared with other health workers | — | — | — |
| Medical doctors and nurse * | 23 (31) | 8 (35) | 1/1 [1] as compared with other health workers | — | — | — |
| Medical secretaries and Receptionists (patients’ desk) * | 10 (13) | 6 (60) | 4/2 [0.06] as compared with other health workers | — | — | — |
| Radiology technicians*(!) | 3 (4) | (3) 100 | 17/3 [0.03] as compared with other health workers | — | — | — |
| Social workers | 6 (8) | 0 (0) | 0.3/0.4 [0.4] | — | — | |
| Support staff/cleaners | 11 (15) | 3 (27) | 0.8/0.83 [1] | |||
| Workers in direct day-to-day contact with patients (*) [Highly exposed] | 36 (48) | 17 (47) | 4/3 [0.01] as compared with other health workers | |||
| — | — | — | ||||
| Formal workers (lawyers, law enforcement officers, accountant, teachers, biologists, etc.) | — | — | — | 23 (25) | 9 (39) | 1.6/1.4 [0.3] as compared with other groups of workers and non-workers |
| Informal sector (traders, drivers, etc.) | — | — | — | 12 (13) | 6 (50) | 2.5/1.8 [0.19] as compared with other groups of workers and non-workers |
| Students | — | — | — | 32 (34) | 10 (31) | 1/1 [1] as compared with other groups of workers and non-workers |
| Without a job | — | — | — | 26 (28) | 4 (15) | 0.3/ 0.4 [0.04] as compared with workers and students |
|
| ||||||
| HIV-infected | 1 (1) | 0 (0) | — | 2 (2) | 1 (50) | — |
| Non-HIV-infected | 74 (99) | 24 (32) | — | 91 (98) | 28 (32) | — |
|
| ||||||
| BCG | 62 (83) | 19 (31) | 0.3/ 0.5 [0.1] as compared with NO BCG | 82 (90) | 25 (35.5) | 0.4/ 0.6 [0.3] as compared with NO BCG |
| NO BCG | 9 (12) | 5 (55.5) | 3/2 [0.1] as compared with BCG | 9 (10) | 3 (33) | 2.3/1.6 [0.3] as compared with BCG |
| Information not provided | 4 (5) | 0 (0) | — | 2 (2) | 1(50) | — |
|
| ||||||
| NO | 45 (60) | 15 (33) | 0.17/0.44 [0.09] as compared with TB-contact | 76 (82) | 23 (30) | 0.4/ 0.0 [0.3] as compared with TB-contact |
| YES (!) | 4 (5) | 3 (75) | 6/2.2 [0.09] as compared with non-contact | 2 (2) | 0 (0) | — |
| Information not provided | 26 (35) | 6 (23) | — | 15 (16) | 6 (40) | — |
|
| ||||||
| 0–4 | 24 (32) | 7 (24) | 0.7/0.8 [0.8] | — | — | — |
| 5–9 | 12 (16) | 2 (17) | 0.3/0.4 [0.1] | — | — | — |
| ⩾10 | 18 (24) | 9 (50) | 3/2 [0.06] | — | — | — |
|
| ||||||
| NO | 33 (44) | 11 (33) | 1/1 [1] as compared with drinkers | 51 (55) | 17 (33) | 1.9/1.6 [0.2] as compared with drinkers |
| YES | 39 (52) | 13 (33) | 1/1 [1] as compared with non-drinkers | 38 (41) | 8 (21) | 0.53/0.63 [0.2] as compared with non-drinkers |
| Information not provided | 3 (4) | 0 (0) | — | 4 (4) | 4 (50) | — |
|
| ||||||
| NO | 67 (89) | 22 (33) | 1/1 [1] as compared with smokers | 86 (92.5) | 26 (30) | 0.6/0.7 [0.5] as compared with smokers |
| YES (!) | 6 (8) | 2 (33) | 1/1 [1] as compared with non-smokers | 7 (75) | 3 (43) | 1.7/1.4 [0.5] as compared with non-smokers |
| Information not provided | 2 (3) | 0 (0) | — | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | — |
|
| ||||||
| NO | 56 (75) | 19 (34) | 0.8/0.87 [0.7] as compared with chronically ill | 64 (69) | 21 (33) | 2/1.7 [0.2] as compared with chronically ill |
| YES | 13 (17) | 5 (38.5) | 1.2/1.1 [0.7] as compared with non-chronically ill | 24 (26) | 5 (21) | 0.5/0.6 [0.2] as compared with non-chronically ill |
| Information not provided | 6 (8) | 0 (0) | — | 3 (3) | 2 (67) | — |
**High blood pressure, Rheumatism, and the gastritis were recorded chronic conditions.
(!) very low number of participants.
Figure 1Concentrations of innate immunity and proinflammatory cytokines (GM-CSF, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α.) in M. tuberculosis latently infected (LTB+) and non-infected (LTB−) healthcare workers (HCWs) and community controls (CCs) before M. tuberculosis antigens stimulation.
Figure 2Cell mediated cytokines responses cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-12 (p70), IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10) in M. tuberculosis latently infected (LTB+) and non-infected (LTB−) healthcare workers (HCWs) and community controls (CCs) before M. tuberculosis antigens stimulation.
Figure 3Levels of M. tuberculosis specific inflammatory markers response (GM-CSF, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α) in the supernatants obtained from the QFT® assays of M. tuberculosis latently infected (LTB+) and non-infected (LTB−) healthcare workers (HCWs) and community controls (CCs).
Figure 4Levels of M. tuberculosis specific cell mediated cytokines responses (IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-12 (p70), IL-4, IL-5 and IL-10) in the supernatants obtained from the QFT® assays of M. tuberculosis latently infected (LTB+) and non-infected (LTB−) healthcare workers (HCWs) and community controls (CCs).
Figure 5Levels of M. tuberculosis specific cytokines responses (GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-10, IL-12 (p70), IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α) in the supernatants obtained from the QFT® assays of highly (≥3 hours per day) and lowly (not in direct contact with active TB patients) exposed M. tuberculosis latently infected (LTB+) healthcare workers (HCWs).
Figure 6Levels of M. tuberculosis specific cytokines responses (GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-10, IL-12 (p70), IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α) in the supernatants obtained from the QFT® assays of HCWs (M. tuberculosis latently infected (LTB+) and non-infected (LTB−) working in contact with active TB patients for 5 to 31 years.