Shweta Sharma1, Katherine E Schlusser2, Pola de la Torre3, Giuseppe Tambussi4, Rika Draenert5, Angie N Pinto6, Julia A Metcalf7, James D Neaton1, Oliver Laeyendecker2,7. 1. Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. 2. Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey, USA. 4. IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. 5. Section Clinical Infectious Diseases, Klinikum der Universität Munich, Medizinische Klinik IV, Munich, Germany. 6. The Kirby Institute, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 7. Division of Clinical Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of immediate vs. deferred antiretroviral therapy (ART) on CD4 recovery among individuals early in HIV infection. DESIGN: Using serologic markers of early infection together with self-reported dates of infection and HIV diagnosis, ART-naive participants who were randomized to immediate vs. deferred ART in the Strategic Timing of Antiretroviral Treatment trial were classified into subgroups of duration of HIV infection at baseline. CD4 cell count recovery over follow-up according to duration of HIV infection was investigated. METHODS:Three subgroups were defined: first, infected 6 months or less (n = 373); second, infected 6-24 months (n = 2634); and third, infected 24 months or longer (n = 1605). Follow-up CD4, CD8, and CD4 : CD8 ratio for the immediate and deferred ART groups were compared by subgroup using linear models. For the deferred ART group, decline to CD4 less than 350 cells/μl or AIDS according to infection duration was compared using time-to-event methods. RESULTS: Follow-up CD4 cell count differences (immediate minus deferred) were greater for those recently infected (+231 cells/μl) compared with the two other subgroups (202 and 171 cells/μl; P < 0.001). CD4 : CD8 ratio treatment differences varied significantly (P < 0.001) according to duration of infection. In the deferred ART group, decline to CD4 less than 350 cells/μl or AIDS was greater among those recently infected (16.1 vs. 13.2 and 10.5 per 100 person years for those infected 6-24 and ≥24 months; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In this randomized comparison of immediate vs. deferred ART, the CD4 cell count difference was greatest for those recently infected with HIV, emphasizing the importance of immediate ART initiation.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of immediate vs. deferred antiretroviral therapy (ART) on CD4 recovery among individuals early in HIV infection. DESIGN: Using serologic markers of early infection together with self-reported dates of infection and HIV diagnosis, ART-naive participants who were randomized to immediate vs. deferred ART in the Strategic Timing of Antiretroviral Treatment trial were classified into subgroups of duration of HIV infection at baseline. CD4 cell count recovery over follow-up according to duration of HIV infection was investigated. METHODS: Three subgroups were defined: first, infected 6 months or less (n = 373); second, infected 6-24 months (n = 2634); and third, infected 24 months or longer (n = 1605). Follow-up CD4, CD8, and CD4 : CD8 ratio for the immediate and deferred ART groups were compared by subgroup using linear models. For the deferred ART group, decline to CD4 less than 350 cells/μl or AIDS according to infection duration was compared using time-to-event methods. RESULTS: Follow-up CD4 cell count differences (immediate minus deferred) were greater for those recently infected (+231 cells/μl) compared with the two other subgroups (202 and 171 cells/μl; P < 0.001). CD4 : CD8 ratio treatment differences varied significantly (P < 0.001) according to duration of infection. In the deferred ART group, decline to CD4 less than 350 cells/μl or AIDS was greater among those recently infected (16.1 vs. 13.2 and 10.5 per 100 person years for those infected 6-24 and ≥24 months; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In this randomized comparison of immediate vs. deferred ART, the CD4 cell count difference was greatest for those recently infected with HIV, emphasizing the importance of immediate ART initiation.
Authors: J J Zaunders; P H Cunningham; A D Kelleher; G R Kaufmann; A B Jaramillo; R Wright; D Smith; P Grey; J Vizzard; A Carr; D A Cooper Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 1999-08 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Jason F Okulicz; Tuan D Le; Brian K Agan; Jose F Camargo; Michael L Landrum; Edwina Wright; Matthew J Dolan; Anuradha Ganesan; Tomas M Ferguson; Davey M Smith; Douglas D Richman; Susan J Little; Robert A Clark; Weijing He; Sunil K Ahuja Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Jens D Lundgren; Abdel G Babiker; Fred Gordin; Sean Emery; Birgit Grund; Shweta Sharma; Anchalee Avihingsanon; David A Cooper; Gerd Fätkenheuer; Josep M Llibre; Jean-Michel Molina; Paula Munderi; Mauro Schechter; Robin Wood; Karin L Klingman; Simon Collins; H Clifford Lane; Andrew N Phillips; James D Neaton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Maria J Buzon; Enrique Martin-Gayo; Florencia Pereyra; Zhengyu Ouyang; Hong Sun; Jonathan Z Li; Michael Piovoso; Amy Shaw; Judith Dalmau; Nadine Zangger; Javier Martinez-Picado; Ryan Zurakowski; Xu G Yu; Amalio Telenti; Bruce D Walker; Eric S Rosenberg; Mathias Lichterfeld Journal: J Virol Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Katherine E Schlusser; Shweta Sharma; Pola de la Torre; Giuseppe Tambussi; Rika Draenert; Angie N Pinto; Julia A Metcalf; Danielle German; James D Neaton; Oliver Laeyendecker Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2018-07
Authors: Jean-Michel Molina; Birgit Grund; Fred Gordin; Ian Williams; Mauro Schechter; Marcello Losso; Matthew Law; Ernest Ekong; Noluthando Mwelase; Athanasios Skoutelis; Martin J Wiselka; Linos Vandekerckhove; Thomas Benfield; David Munroe; Jens D Lundgren; James D Neaton Journal: Lancet HIV Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 16.070
Authors: Mario Ostrowski; Erika Benko; Feng Yun Yue; Connie J Kim; Sanja Huibner; Terry Lee; Joel Singer; Jim Pankovich; Oliver Laeyendecker; Rupert Kaul; Gabor Kandel; Colin Kovacs Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2015-09-22 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Jacob Konikoff; Ron Brookmeyer; Andrew F Longosz; Matthew M Cousins; Connie Celum; Susan P Buchbinder; George R Seage; Gregory D Kirk; Richard D Moore; Shruti H Mehta; Joseph B Margolick; Joelle Brown; Kenneth H Mayer; Beryl A Koblin; Jessica E Justman; Sally L Hodder; Thomas C Quinn; Susan H Eshleman; Oliver Laeyendecker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-12-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: O T Stirrup; A J Copas; A N Phillips; M J Gill; R B Geskus; G Touloumi; J Young; H C Bucher; A G Babiker Journal: HIV Med Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 3.180
Authors: Ryan Handoko; Donn J Colby; Eugène Kroon; Carlo Sacdalan; Mark de Souza; Suteeraporn Pinyakorn; Peeriya Prueksakaew; Chutharat Munkong; Sasiwimol Ubolyam; Siriwat Akapirat; Jennifer Chiarella; Shelly Krebs; Irini Sereti; Victor Valcour; Robert Paul; Nelson L Michael; Nittaya Phanuphak; Jintanat Ananworanich; Serena Spudich Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: S Fidler; S Lewin; S Deeks; O S Sogaard; L Vanderkerckhove; S Collins; D Kelly; J Singh; M Caskey; J Frater Journal: J Virus Erad Date: 2020-12-06
Authors: Sheila M Keating; Wes Rountree; Eduard Grebe; Andrea L Pappas; Mars Stone; Dylan Hampton; Christopher A Todd; Marek S Poniewierski; Ana Sanchez; Cassandra G Porth; Thomas N Denny; Michael P Busch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 3.240