A Thacoor1, T W Pike2, S Pathak2, J Dixon3, C Macutkiewicz4, A M Smith2. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Leeds , UK. 2. Department of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Leeds , UK. 3. School of Medicine, University of Leeds , Leeds , UK. 4. Department of HPB Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road , Manchester , UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative cholangiography is sporadically used in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy to delineate common bile duct anatomy and exclude retained stones. In patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis, intraoperative cholangiography may reduce the need for preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected patient database was undertaken over a 15-year period. The primary objective was to evaluate intraoperative assessment of the common bile duct with intraoperative cholangiography in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis. RESULTS: A total of 2215 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between October 1998 and December 2013; 113 patients (of whom 77 were women) with a mean age of 54 years (range 16-88 years) were diagnosed with acute gallstone pancreatitis. Of these, 102 patients (90%) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography, which was normal in 89 cases. Thirteen patients had choledocholithiasis on intraoperative cholangiography, 11 of whom were managed with concomitant trans-cystic duct exploration and clearance. Two patients required postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. CONCLUSIONS: In patients diagnosed with acute gallstone pancreatitis, it is reasonable to proceed directly to surgery using intraoperative cholangiography on the same admission as the definitive assessment of the common bile duct. This negates the need for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and can translate into cost savings and reduced length of stay.
INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative cholangiography is sporadically used in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy to delineate common bile duct anatomy and exclude retained stones. In patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis, intraoperative cholangiography may reduce the need for preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected patient database was undertaken over a 15-year period. The primary objective was to evaluate intraoperative assessment of the common bile duct with intraoperative cholangiography in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis. RESULTS: A total of 2215 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between October 1998 and December 2013; 113 patients (of whom 77 were women) with a mean age of 54 years (range 16-88 years) were diagnosed with acute gallstone pancreatitis. Of these, 102 patients (90%) underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography, which was normal in 89 cases. Thirteen patients had choledocholithiasis on intraoperative cholangiography, 11 of whom were managed with concomitant trans-cystic duct exploration and clearance. Two patients required postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. CONCLUSIONS: In patients diagnosed with acute gallstone pancreatitis, it is reasonable to proceed directly to surgery using intraoperative cholangiography on the same admission as the definitive assessment of the common bile duct. This negates the need for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and can translate into cost savings and reduced length of stay.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cholecystectomy; Gallstone; Intraoperative cholangiography; Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; Pancreatitis
Authors: K N Jamal; H Smith; K Ratnasingham; M R Siddiqui; G McLachlan; A P Belgaumkar Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 1.891
Authors: Jón H Hjartarson; Pétur Hannesson; Ingvar Sverrisson; Sigurður Blöndal; Bjarki Ívarsson; Einar S Björnsson Journal: Scand J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 2.423