Literature DB >> 27181286

The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the exclusion of choledocholithiasis.

Jón H Hjartarson1, Pétur Hannesson2, Ingvar Sverrisson3, Sigurður Blöndal3, Bjarki Ívarsson2, Einar S Björnsson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ability of Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) to exclude choledocholithiasis (CDL) in symptomatic patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients suspected of choledocholithiasis who underwent MRCP from 2008 through 2013 in a population based study at the National University Hospital of Iceland were retrospectively analysed, using ERCP and/or intraoperative cholangiography as a gold standard diagnosis for CDL.
RESULTS: Overall 920 patients [66% women, mean age 55 years (SD 21)] underwent MRCP. A total of 392 patients had a normal MRCP of which 71 underwent an ERCP investigation demonstrating a CBD stone in 29 patients. A normal MRCP was found to have a 93% negative predictive value (NPV) and 89% probability of having no CBD stone demonstrated as well as no readmission due to gallstone disease within six months following MRCP. During a 6-month follow-up period of the 321 patients who did not undergo an ERCP nine (2.8%) patients were readmitted with right upper quadrant pain and elevated liver tests which later normalised with no CBD stone being demonstrated, three (0.9%) patients were readmitted with presumed gallstone pancreatitis, two (0.6%) patients were readmitted with cholecystitis and two (0.6%) patients were lost to follow-up. Seven patients of those 321 underwent an intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) and all were negative for CBD stones. For the sub-group requiring ERCP following a normal MRCP the NPV was 63%.
CONCLUSION: Our results support the use of MRCP as a tool for exclusion of choledocholithiasis with the potential to reduce the amount of unnecessary ERCP procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choledocholithiasis; ERCP; MRCP; common bile duct; intraoperative cholangiogram; logistic regression

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27181286     DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1182584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  3 in total

1.  The role of intraoperative cholangiography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis: is magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography needed?

Authors:  A Thacoor; T W Pike; S Pathak; J Dixon; C Macutkiewicz; A M Smith
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Once upon a Time a Guideline Was Used for the Evaluation of Suspected Choledocholithiasis: A Fairy Tale or a Nightmare?

Authors:  Jorge Canena
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-11-08

3.  The efficacy of pineapple juice as a negative oral contrast agent in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Sheryl Mohabir; Richard D Pitcher; Rubeshan Perumal; Matthew D M Goodier
Journal:  SA J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.