Literature DB >> 31155859

Electronic and paper mode of data capture when assessing patient-reported outcomes in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Dorota T Kopycka-Kedzierawski1, Rita Cacciato1, Roslyn Hennessey2, Cyril Meyerowitz1, Mark S Litaker3, Marc W Heft4, Kimberly S Johnson5, Stephanie C Reyes6, James D Johnson4, Camille T Baltuck7, Gregg H Gilbert3.   

Abstract

AIM: Our objectives were to describe the approach used in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network to capture patient-reported outcomes and to compare electronic and paper modes of data capture in a specific network study.
METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter cohort study of 1862 patients with dentin hypersensitivity. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed based on patients' perception of pain using Visual Analog Scales and Labeled Magnitude scales at baseline and at 1, 4 and 8 weeks post-baseline.
RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of study patients chose to complete follow-up assessments via an electronic mode; 15% completed them via a paper mode. There was not a significant difference in the proportions of patients who completed the 8-week assessment when comparing the electronic mode to the paper mode (92% vs. 90.8%, P = 0.31, Rao-Scott clustered χ2 -test).
CONCLUSION: The electronic mode of data capture was as operational as the traditional paper mode, while also providing the advantage of eliminating data entry errors, not involving site research coordinators in measuring the patient-reported outcomes, and not incurring cost and potential delays due to mailing study forms. Electronic data capture of patient reported outcomes could be successfully implemented in the community dental practice setting.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electronic data capture; Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity; National Dental Practice-Based Research Network; dentin sensitivity; patient-reported outcome measures

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31155859      PMCID: PMC6874706          DOI: 10.1111/jicd.12427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Investig Clin Dent        ISSN: 2041-1618


  15 in total

1.  Evaluating health-related quality of life: cost comparison of computerized touch-screen technology and traditional paper systems.

Authors:  J H Lofland; M Schaffer; N Goldfarb
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.705

2.  Patient-Centered Dentinal Hypersensitivity Treatment Outcomes: Results from the National Dental PBRN.

Authors:  M W Heft; M S Litaker; D T Kopycka-Kedzierawski; C Meyerowitz; S Chonowski; R L Yardic; V V Gordan; R Mungia; G H Gilbert
Journal:  JDR Clin Trans Res       Date:  2017-11-13

3.  Management of dentin hypersensitivity by practitioners in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Dorota T Kopycka-Kedzierawski; Cyril Meyerowitz; Mark S Litaker; Marc W Heft; Nirmala Tasgaonkar; Marianne R Day; Andretta Porter-Williams; Valeria V Gordan; Robin L Yardic; Timothy M Lawhorn; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 3.634

4.  Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.

Authors:  Stephen Joel Coons; Chad J Gwaltney; Ron D Hays; J Jason Lundy; Jeff A Sloan; Dennis A Revicki; William R Lenderking; David Cella; Ethan Basch
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Agreement between patient-reported symptoms and their documentation in the medical record.

Authors:  Serguei V Pakhomov; Steven J Jacobsen; Christopher G Chute; Veronique L Roger
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Validation and patient acceptance of a computer touch screen version of the WOMAC 3.1 osteoarthritis index.

Authors:  H A Bischoff-Ferrari; M Vondechend; N Bellamy; R Theiler
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Use of electronic data collection to assess pain in thalassaemia: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Felicia L Trachtenberg; Marie Martin; Sage Green; Olivia Oliveros; Susan Carson; Eric Gerstenberger; Racquel Allen; Jennifer Eile; Dru Haines
Journal:  Int J Palliat Nurs       Date:  2012-09

8.  Strategies to use tablet computers for collection of electronic patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Kara Schick-Makaroff; Anita Molzahn
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity by National Dental Practice-Based Research Network practitioners: results from a questionnaire administered prior to initiation of a clinical study on this topic.

Authors:  Dorota T Kopycka-Kedzierawski; Cyril Meyerowitz; Mark S Litaker; Sidney Chonowski; Marc W Heft; Valeria V Gordan; Robin L Yardic; Theresa E Madden; Stephanie C Reyes; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Collection of patient-reported outcomes;--text messages on mobile phones provide valid scores and high response rates.

Authors:  Anne Christie; Hanne Dagfinrud; Øystein Dale; Trenton Schulz; Kåre Birger Hagen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparing Single-Page, Multipage, and Conversational Digital Forms in Health Care: Usability Study.

Authors:  Aleeha Iftikhar; Raymond R Bond; Victoria McGilligan; Stephen J Leslie; Khaled Rjoob; Charles Knoery; Ciara Quigg; Ryan Campbell; Kyle Boyd; Anne McShane; Aaron Peace
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2021-05-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.