Literature DB >> 29276777

Patient-Centered Dentinal Hypersensitivity Treatment Outcomes: Results from the National Dental PBRN.

M W Heft1, M S Litaker2, D T Kopycka-Kedzierawski3, C Meyerowitz3, S Chonowski4, R L Yardic5, V V Gordan6, R Mungia7, G H Gilbert8.   

Abstract

Dentinal hypersensitivity (DH) can have a significant impact on oral health and functioning, and it is a clinical symptom commonly managed by dentists during routine clinical practice. DH symptoms are typically elicited by otherwise innocuous, nonpainful stimuli applied to exposed dentin (e.g., tactile stimuli, warming or cooling temperatures or air puffs). Treatment approaches have sought to directly target the dentinal pulp tissues or close dentinal tubules via dental office care and treatment services (fluoride varnishes, glutaraldehydes, bonding agents, sealants, oxalates, or lasers) or home care services (toothpastes or dentifrices containing fluoride or potassium nitrate compounds). The purpose of this prospective multicenter cohort study was to assess how community-based dentists from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network (National Dental PBRN) manage DH and whether the effectiveness of DH treatments can be assessed in those settings. A total of 171 dentists recruited 1862 subjects with DH from their existing patients. Dentists then recommended and provided DH treatment as appropriate. Treatment choice was at the discretion of the dentists. Patients rated their DH pain at baseline and 1, 4, and 8 wk during the course of their treatments. They used pain intensity and unpleasantness visual analog scales and 4 labeled magnitude scales and rated their satisfaction with treatment after 8 wk. Patients were provided reminders postbaseline via email, texting, or voice mail. These patient-centered outcomes served as the principal measures for the assessment of treatment because treatments sought to alleviate DH symptoms. The patients with DH who reported pain reduction from dentist-provided treatments (glutaraldehyde/HEMA [hydroxyethyl methacrylate] compounds, oxalates, and bonding agents), dentists' advice and counseling regarding oral habits and diet, and patient-applied fluoride toothpaste reported a concomitant positive rating of satisfaction with DH treatments. The results from this study support the feasibility of engaging network practices to assess the effectiveness of clinical DH treatments. Knowledge Transfer Statement: National Dental PBRN dentists provide a range of procedures to treat dentinal hypersensitivity. In this large nonrandomized study designed to assess clinical care and to capture patient-reported outcomes, about 60% of patients reported improvement in pain. This study demonstrated the feasibility of engaging network dentists and their patients to assess treatment effectiveness. Future studies will explore the feasibility of imposing randomization and measuring patient compliance with treatment in the manner that this treatment is provided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Dental Practice-Based Research Network; clinical study; dentin sensitivity; pain; patient satisfaction; primary health care

Year:  2017        PMID: 29276777      PMCID: PMC5734463          DOI: 10.1177/2380084417742099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JDR Clin Trans Res        ISSN: 2380-0844


  16 in total

Review 1.  The paradox of pain from tooth pulp: low-threshold "algoneurons"?

Authors:  Kaj Fried; Barry J Sessle; Marshall Devor
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 2.  Managing dentin hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Robin Orchardson; David G Gillam
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  Intraindividual variability in daily sleep and pain ratings among chronic pain patients: bidirectional association and the role of negative mood.

Authors:  Erin M O'Brien; Lori B Waxenberg; James W Atchison; Henry A Gremillion; Roland M Staud; Christina S McCrae; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials on dentine hypersensitivity.

Authors:  G R Holland; M N Narhi; M Addy; L Gangarosa; R Orchardson
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 5.  Dentine hypersensitivity - an enigma? A review of terminology, mechanisms, aetiology and management.

Authors:  R H Dababneh; A T Khouri; M Addy
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1999-12-11       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures.

Authors:  J T Farrar; R K Portenoy; J A Berlin; J L Kinman; B L Strom
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Development of labeled magnitude scales for the assessment of pain of dentin hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Lisa J Heaton; Ashley P Barlow; Susan E Coldwell
Journal:  J Orofac Pain       Date:  2013

8.  The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity in general dental practices in the northwest United States.

Authors:  Joana Cunha-Cruz; John C Wataha; Lisa J Heaton; Marilynn Rothen; Martin Sobieraj; JoAnna Scott; Joel Berg
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.634

9.  Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity by National Dental Practice-Based Research Network practitioners: results from a questionnaire administered prior to initiation of a clinical study on this topic.

Authors:  Dorota T Kopycka-Kedzierawski; Cyril Meyerowitz; Mark S Litaker; Sidney Chonowski; Marc W Heft; Valeria V Gordan; Robin L Yardic; Theresa E Madden; Stephanie C Reyes; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity.

Authors:  Marshall Godwin; Lucia Ruhland; Ian Casson; Susan MacDonald; Dianne Delva; Richard Birtwhistle; Miu Lam; Rachelle Seguin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  5 in total

1.  Electronic and paper mode of data capture when assessing patient-reported outcomes in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Authors:  Dorota T Kopycka-Kedzierawski; Rita Cacciato; Roslyn Hennessey; Cyril Meyerowitz; Mark S Litaker; Marc W Heft; Kimberly S Johnson; Stephanie C Reyes; James D Johnson; Camille T Baltuck; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  J Investig Clin Dent       Date:  2019-06-02

2.  Onset and resolution of pain among treated and untreated posterior teeth with a visible crack: Three-year findings from the national dental practice-based research network.

Authors:  Ellen Funkhouser; Jack L Ferracane; Thomas J Hilton; Valeria V Gordan; Gregg H Gilbert; Rahma Mungia; Vanessa Burton; Cyril Meyerowitz; Dorota T Kopycka-Kedzierawski
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The effectiveness of home-use photobiomodulation toothbrush for treating dentin hypersensitivity: A pilot study.

Authors:  Maziar Mir; Seyed Masoud Mojahedi; Jan Tunér; Masoud Shabani; Fatemeh Darabi; Alireza Rohban
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2019-09-30

4.  Impact of toothpaste on oral health-related quality of life in people with dentine hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Stephen Mason; Gary R Burnett; Nisha Patel; Avinash Patil; Robert Maclure
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  A randomized, controlled, two-month pilot trial of stannous fluoride dentifrice versus sodium fluoride dentifrice after oxalate treatment for dentinal hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Chad J Anderson; Gerard Kugel; Yuanshu Zou; Marco Ferrari; Robert Gerlach
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 3.573

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.