| Literature DB >> 31155745 |
Shinji Saiki1, Yukiko Sasazawa1,2, Motoki Fujimaki1, Koji Kamagata3, Naoko Kaga4, Hikari Taka4, Yuanzhe Li1, Sanae Souma1, Taku Hatano1, Yoko Imamichi1, Norihiko Furuya1,5, Akio Mori1, Yutaka Oji1, Shin-Ichi Ueno1, Shuko Nojiri6, Yoshiki Miura4, Takashi Ueno4, Manabu Funayama1,2,7, Shigeki Aoki3, Nobutaka Hattori1,2,5,7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Aging is the highest risk factor for Parkinson disease (PD). Under physiological conditions, spermidine and spermine experimentally enhance longevity via autophagy induction. Accordingly, we evaluated the ability of each polyamine metabolite to act as an age-related, diagnostic, and severity-associated PD biomarker.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31155745 PMCID: PMC6772170 DOI: 10.1002/ana.25516
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Neurol ISSN: 0364-5134 Impact factor: 10.422
Figure 1Polyamine metabolism in humans. Schematic shows polyamines (putrescine, spermidine, and spermine), and their acetylated metabolites and converting enzymes. Ac‐CoA = acetyl‐coenzyme A; APAO = N1‐acetylpolyamine oxidase; ATP = adenosine triphosphate; CoA = coenzyme A; MTA = 5′‐deoxy‐5′‐methylthioadenosine; SAMHC = S‐adenosylmethyl homocysteamine; SAT1/2 = spermidine/spermine acetyltransferase 1/2.
Demographic Characteristics of Participants in Both Cohorts
| Characteristic | Cohort A | Cohort B |
| De Novo PD | PSP | AD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | PD | Control | PD | |||||
| n | 45 | 145 | 49 | 186 | — | 4 | 19 | 23 |
| Sex, M:F | 23:22 | 70:75 | 24:25 | 80:106 | 0.455 | 1:3 | 13:6 | 7:16 |
| Age, mean yr (SD) | 63.8 (15.3) | 67.5 (10.2) | 63.0 (14.7) | 67.6 (9.56) | 0.105 | 68.5 (5.45) | 71.0 (6.86) | 75.2 (8.96) |
| Duration, mean yr (SD) | — | 7.04 (5.61) | — | 7.27 (5.36) | — | 1.75 (0.957) | 4.89 (2.26) | 3.61 (2.21) |
| H&Y stage, mean (SD) | — | 2.09 (0.897) | — | 2.05 (0.907) | — | 2.00 (0.00) | 3.76 (1.15) | — |
| H&Y stage (cases, n) | — | I (41), II (60), III (35), IV (8), V (1) | — | 0 (1), I (54), II (81), III (35), IV (15), V (0) | — | II (4) | I (1), II (2), III (3), IV (9), V (4) | — |
| UPDRS‐III, mean (range) | — | 14.8 (1–57) | — | 13.5 (0–54) | — | 10.0 (8–12) | — | — |
| MMSE, mean (SD) | 28.9 (2.09) | 27.8 (3.14) | 28.8 (2.24) | 27.8 (3.10) | 0.021 | 27.0 (0.00) | 20.3 (9.54) | 18.2 (6.45) |
| BMI, mean kg/m2 (SD) | 23.2 (3.59) | 22.4 (3.29) | 23.2 (3.69) | 22.6 (3.37) | 0.184 | 21.1 (0.518) | — | — |
| L‐dopa, mg | — | 386 (214) | — | 399 (239) | — | 0 | 371 (302) | — |
| L‐dopa, equivalent dose | — | 618 (342) | — | 606 (357) | — | 0 | 494 (343) | — |
Cohort A corresponds to 2nd cohort in our previous report.16
Probability values obtained by Wilcoxon test between controls and PD within Cohort B.
Probability value obtained by chi‐squared test between controls and PD within Cohort B.
Duration was defined as time since onset of initial motor symptoms.
AD = Alzheimer disease; BMI = body mass index; F = female; H&Y = Hoehn and Yahr stage; M = male; MMSE = Mini‐Mental State Examination; PD = Parkinson disease; PSP = progressive supranuclear palsy; SD = standard deviation; UPDRS‐III = Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor section.
Polyamine Metabolites in Cohort B Patients
| Compound Name | Comparative Analysis | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD/Control | De Novo PD/Control | PSP/Control | AD/Control | |||||
| Ratio |
| Ratio |
| Ratio |
| Ratio |
| |
| DiAcSpd | 2.77 | <0.0001 | 1.95 | 0.134 | 1.93 | <0.0001 | 1.51 | 0.0811 |
|
| 1.46 | <0.0001 | 0.850 | 0.661 | 1.74 | 0.0002 | 1.11 | 0.237 |
|
| 1.55 | <0.0001 | 1.09 | 0.968 | 1.89 | <0.0001 | 1.53 | 0.0006 |
| DiAcSpm | 1.59 | <0.0001 | 0.892 | 1.00 | 1.65 | 0.0001 | 2.11 | 0.0763 |
| Spd | 1.80 | <0.0001 | 1.57 | 0.0764 | 1.05 | 1.00 | 1.02 | 0.886 |
|
| 0.945 | 0.302 | 0.770 | 0.404 | 1.43 | 0.0012 | 1.05 | 0.999 |
| Spm | 0.762 | 0.0468 | 0.776 | 0.951 | 1.21 | 0.223 | 0.563 | 0.0013 |
| Spm/Spd ratio | 0.459 | <0.0001 | 0.515 | 0.106 | 1.43 | 0.154 | 0.544 | <0.0001 |
Probability values were obtained by Steel test between healthy controls and each disease.
AD = Alzheimer disease; DiAcSpd = N1,N8‐diacetylspermidine; DiAcSpm = N1,N12‐diacetylspermine; N1‐AcSpd = N1‐acetylspermidine; N1‐AcSpm = N1‐acetylspermine; N8‐AcSpd = N8‐acetylspermidine; PD = Parkinson disease; PSP = progressive supranuclear palsy; Spd = spermidine; Spm = spermine.
Figure 2Acetylated spermidine (Spd)/spermine (Spm) positively correlates with Parkinson disease severity. (A–F) Levels of N1,N8‐diacetylspermidine (DiAcSpd), N8‐acetylspermidine (N8‐AcSpd), and N1,N12‐diacetylspermine (DiAcSpm) positively correlated with Parkinson disease severity assessed by Hoehn and Yahr stages (H&Y), whereas other polyamine metabolites did not. Values indicate the amount of each metabolite (pmol) in 200μl serum. (G) Levels of Spm were significantly decreased in Parkinson disease, at H&Y stages I and IV. Values indicate the amount of each metabolite (pmol) in 200μl serum. (H) Receiver operating characteristic curves for all serum polyamine metabolites and corresponding area under the curve (AUC) statistics for the true positive rate of Parkinson disease diagnosis in Cohort B. (I) Scatterplots showing positive relationships between DiAcSpd and fractional anisotropy (FA) in Parkinson disease. (J) Significant positive correlation between N1,N8‐diacetylspermidine and FA, adjusted for age and L‐dopa equivalent dose (p < 0.05, familywise error corrected) in Parkinson disease patients. Significant clusters were overlaid onto a Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) ICBM152 standard brain T1‐weighted image. Slices in MNI coordinates x, y, z are shown in millimeters. Colored bar represents p value. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 (Steel test or analysis of variance). N1‐AcSpd = N1‐acetylspermidine; N1‐AcSpm: N1‐acetylspermine; NS = not significant.
Correlation Analysis with Logistic Regression or Multiple Regression Model of Each Polyamine Metabolite, Disease Severity (H&Y or UPDRS‐III), and LED
| Compound Name | H&Y (normalized to LED) | UPDRS‐III (normalized to LED) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| DiAcSpd | 3.45 | 0.0096 | 4.28 | 0.04 |
|
| 0.77 | 0.546 | 0.169 | 0.681 |
|
| 3.08 | 0.0176 | 3.08 | 0.0808 |
| DiAcSpm | 3.73 | 0.0061 | 3.2 | 0.0755 |
| Spd | 1.31 | 0.27 | 1.46 | 0.229 |
|
| 1.22 | 0.303 | 0.576 | 0.449 |
| Spm | 1.62 | 0.172 | 0.0022 | 0.962 |
| Spm/Spd ratio | 0.156 | 0.96 | 1.15 | 0.285 |
Obtained by logistic regression analysis.
Obtained by multiple regression analysis.
DiAcSpd = N1,N8‐diacetylspermidine; DiAcSpm = N1,N12‐diacetylspermine; H&Y = Hoehn and Yahr stage; LED = L‐dopa equivalent dose; N1‐AcSpd = N1‐acetylspermidine; N1‐AcSpm = N1‐acetylspermine; N8‐AcSpd = N8‐acetylspermidine; Spd = spermidine; Spm = spermine; UPDRS‐III = Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor section.
Correlation Analysis with Logistic Regression or Multiple Regression Model of Each Polyamine Metabolite, Disease Severity (H&Y or UPDRS‐III), and Age at Sampling
| Compound Name | H&Y (normalized by age at sampling) | UPDRS‐III (normalized by age at sampling) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
| DiAcSpd | 3.18 | 0.015 | 5.85 | 0.0165 |
|
| 1.32 | 0.263 | 0.146 | 0.228 |
|
| 3.22 | 0.014 | 4.58 | 0.0337 |
| DiAcSpm | 2.94 | 0.0301 | 3.26 | 0.0725 |
| Spd | 1.45 | 0.219 | 1.37 | 0.244 |
|
| 1.41 | 0.233 | 0.258 | 0.612 |
| Spm | 1.79 | 0.132 | 0.730 | 0.394 |
| Spm/Spd ratio | 0.185 | 0.946 | 0.0407 | 0.840 |
Obtained by logistic regression analysis.
Obtained by multiple regression analysis.
DiAcSpd = N1,N8‐diacetylspermidine; DiAcSpm = N1,N12‐diacetylspermine; H&Y = Hoehn and Yahr stage; N1‐AcSpd = N1‐acetylspermidine; N1‐AcSpm = N1‐acetylspermine; N8‐AcSpd = N8‐acetylspermidine; Spd = spermidine; Spm = spermine; UPDRS‐III = Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor section.
Patients’ Characteristics of PD with or without Diffusion Tensor Imaging
| Characteristic | PD | PD with Diffusion Tensor Imaging |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean yr (SD) | 67.6 (9.56) | 69.5 (10.0) | 0.406 |
| H&Y, mean (SD) | 2.05(0.907) | 2.15 (0.745) | 0.649 |
| UPDRS‐III, mean (SD) | 13.5 (9.89) | 11.4 (7.60) | 0.357 |
| L‐dopa, mean mg (SD) | 399 (239) | 413 (210) | 0.807 |
| MMSE, mean (SD) | 27.8 (3.10) | 26.7 (3.37) | 0.164 |
| L‐dopa equivalent dose, mean (SD) | 606 (357) | 607 (279) | 0.990 |
| DiAcSpd, mean (SD) | 0.704 (0.365) | 0.751 (0.430) | 0.590 |
|
| 18.9 (10.8) | 21.9 (11.8) | 0.245 |
|
| 11.2 (3.42) | 11.8 (3.03) | 0.451 |
| DiAcSpm, mean (SD) | 0.916 (0.689) | 0.861 (0.431) | 0.728 |
| Spd, mean (SD) | 23.6 (11.9) | 24.7 (14.9) | 0.726 |
|
| 0.496 (0.280) | 0.549 (0.346) | 0.434 |
| Spm, mean (SD) | 4.24 (2.00) | 4.47 (2.09) | 0.621 |
| Spm/Spd ratio, mean (SD) | 0.208 (0.118) | 0.220 (0.115) | 0.666 |
Probability values were obtained by Wilcoxon test between PD and PD with diffusion tensor imaging.
DiAcSpd = N1,N8‐diacetylspermidine; DiAcSpm = N1,N12‐diacetylspermine; H&Y = Hoehn and Yahr stage; MMSE = Mini‐Mental State Examination; N1‐AcSpd = N1‐acetylspermidine; N1‐AcSpm = N1‐acetylspermine; N8‐AcSpd = N8‐acetylspermidine; PD = Parkinson disease; SD = standard deviation; Spd = spermidine; Spm = spermine; UPDRS‐III = Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor section.
Figure 3Conversion of spermidine (Spd) to spermine (Spm) is suppressed in Parkinson disease (PD), without association with disease severity. (A) Spm/Spd ratio was significantly decreased in PD patients. ***p < 0.001 (Wilcoxon test). (B) Multiple comparisons of the Spm/Spd ratios showed significant decreases in each Hoehn and Yahr stage (H&Y) relative to the controls. ***p < 0.001 (Steel test). (C) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of Spm/Spd ratio. (D) ROC curve analysis of Spm/Spd ratio and N1,N8‐diacetylspermidine. (E) Spm/Spd ratios of all controls and PD patients shown on the same graph. Interaction was assessed by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) between control and PD groups. AUC = area under the curve.
Figure 4Specific polyamines induced autophagy in SH‐SY5Y cells. (A) Cells were treated with 50μM spermine (Spm) for 4 hours. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti‐LC3 and β‐actin antibodies, and then signal intensities of LC3‐II/β‐actin level in Spm‐treated cells (normalized to control cells) were quantified using ImageJ software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/index.html). Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of 3 samples. (B) SH‐SY5Y cells were treated with the indicated chemicals for 4 hours. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti‐LC3 and β‐actin antibodies. (C) SH‐SY5Y cells were treated with spermidine (Spd), N1‐acetylspermine (N1‐AcSpm), and Spm at 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 50, or 100μM for 4 hours. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti‐LC3 and β‐actin antibodies, and then signal intensities of LC3‐II (normalized to β‐actin) were quantified using ImageJ software. Results are presented as mean ± SD of 3 samples. (D, E) SH‐SY5Y cells were treated with 50μM Spm or Spd, with or without lysosomal inhibitors (D, 100nM bafilomycin A1; E, E64D plus pepstatin A) for 4 hours. Cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti‐LC3 and β‐actin antibodies. DiAcSpd = N1,N8‐acetylspermidine; DiAcSpm = N1,N12‐acetylspermine; N1‐AcSpd = N1‐acetylspermidine; N1‐AcSpm = N1‐acetylspermine; N8‐AcSpd = N8‐acetylspermidine; Put = putrescine.