Literature DB >> 31155673

Impact of preoperative fractional flow reserve on arterial bypass graft anastomotic function: the IMPAG trial.

David Glineur1, Juan B Grau1, Pierre-Yves Etienne2, Umberto Benedetto3, Jacqueline H Fortier1, Spiridon Papadatos2, Christophe Laruelle4, Denis Pieters4, Elie El Khoury4, Philippe Blouard4, Patrick Timmermans4, Marc Ruel1, Aun-Yeong Chong5, Derek So5, Vincent Chan1, Fraser Rubens1, Mario Fl Gaudino3.   

Abstract

AIMS: Visual estimation is the most commonly used method to evaluate the degree of coronary artery stenosis prior to coronary artery bypass grafting. In interventional cardiology, the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide revascularization decisions has become routine. We investigated whether the preoperative FFR measurement of coronary lesions is associated with anastomosis function 6 months after surgical revascularization using a multiarterial grafting strategy. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In this prospective double-blind study, 67 patients were enrolled from two institutions in Europe and Canada. From these patients, 199 coronary lesions were assessed visually and with FFR at the time of the preoperative angiogram. All patients received coronary revascularization using multiple arterial grafts. A post-operative 6-month angiogram was performed to assess anastomosis functionality using a described angiographic method. The primary outcome was the association between preoperative FFR values and anastomosis function 6 months after surgery. Preoperative FFR was significantly associated with 6-months anastomotic function for all conduits and for all targets (P  <  0.001). An FFR value of ≤0.78 was associated with an anastomotic occlusion rate of 3%.
CONCLUSION: We found a significant association between the preoperative FFR measurement of the target vessel and the anastomotic functionality at 6 months, with a cut-off of 0.78. Integration of FFR measurement into the preoperative diagnostic workup before multiarterial coronary surgical revascularization leads to improved anastomotic graft function. CLINICAL TRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02527044. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arterial graft; CABG; FFR; Flow competition

Year:  2019        PMID: 31155673     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  17 in total

1.  How to build a multi-arterial coronary artery bypass programme: a stepwise approach.

Authors:  Mario F L Gaudino; Sigrid Sandner; Giorgia Bonalumi; Jennifer S Lawton; Stephen E Fremes
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 2.  Clinical use of physiological lesion assessment using pressure guidewires: an expert consensus document of the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics-update 2022.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Kawase; Hitoshi Matsuo; Shoichi Kuramitsu; Yasutsugu Shiono; Takashi Akasaka; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Tetsuya Amano; Ken Kozuma; Masato Nakamura; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Yoshio Kobayashi; Yuji Ikari
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2022-05-11

Review 3.  The Role of Angiogenesis and Arteriogenesis in Myocardial Infarction and Coronary Revascularization.

Authors:  Cristiano Spadaccio; Antonio Nenna; David Rose; Francesco Piccirillo; Annunziata Nusca; Francesco Grigioni; Massimo Chello; Gus J Vlahakes
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Physiology or Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  José Martins; Vera Afreixo; Luís Santos; Luís Fernandes; Ana Briosa
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.667

5.  A new way to use transit-time flow measurement for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Lukas Stastny; Markus Kofler; Vitalijs Zujs; Elfriede Ruttmann; Julia Dumfarth; Juliane Kilo; Alexandra Brix; Simone Gasser; Adel Sakic; Thomas Schachner; Michael Grimm; Nikolaos Bonaros
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-05-10

6.  The association between coronary graft patency and clinical status in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Antonino Di Franco; Deepak L Bhatt; John H Alexander; Antonio Abbate; Lorenzo Azzalini; Sigrid Sandner; Garima Sharma; Sunil V Rao; Filippo Crea; Stephen E Fremes; Sripal Bangalore
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Long-term outcome after deferred revascularization due to negative fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions.

Authors:  Jerremy Weerts; Tobias Pustjens; Elsa Amin; Mustafa Ilhan; Leo F Veenstra; Ralph A L J Theunissen; Jindrich Vainer; Mera Stein; Lex A W Ruiters; Ben C G Gho; Arnoud W J Van't Hof; Saman Rasoul
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  The evidence for radial artery grafting: When and when not?

Authors:  Gianmarco Cancelli; Katia Audisio; David Chadow; Giovanni J Soletti; Mario Gaudino
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-09-24

9.  Commentary: The saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass grafting: Optimizing our workhorse.

Authors:  Max T Buchko; Marc Ruel
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-10-19

10.  Commentary: We are talking about a vessel and not just a pipe.

Authors:  Hugo M N Issa; Marc Ruel
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2022-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.