| Literature DB >> 31155568 |
Yohei Ikebe1, Hideki Ishimaru1, Hiroshi Imai2, Kuniko Abe3, Tsuyoshi Izumo4, Yoichi Morofuji4, Reiko Ideguchi1, Minoru Morikawa1, Masataka Uetani1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Identifying plaque components such as intraplaque hemorrhage, lipid rich necrosis, and calcification is important to evaluate vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaque; however, conventional vessel wall MR imaging may fail to discriminate plaque components. We aimed to evaluate the components of plaques using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), a newly developed post-processing technique to provide voxel-based quantitative susceptibilities.Entities:
Keywords: intraplaque hemorrhage; magnetic resonance imaging; plaque imaging; quantitative susceptibility mapping
Year: 2019 PMID: 31155568 PMCID: PMC7232036 DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2018-0077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Magn Reson Med Sci ISSN: 1347-3182 Impact factor: 2.471
The relative susceptibility values between each component (hemorrhage, lipid rich necrosis and calcification) and sternocleidomastoid muscle
| Case no. | Age (years) | Sex | History of infarction | Mean relative susceptibility values | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemorrhage | Lipid rich necrosis | Calcification | |||||
| 1 | 66 | Male | + | 632 | 343 | −709 | |
| 2 | 68 | Male | + | 699 | 127 | −623 | |
| 3 | 82 | Male | + | None | 14 | −735 | |
| 4 | 76 | Male | − | 146 | −125 | −802 | |
| 5 | 39 | Male | + | 203 | 56 | None | |
| 6 | 80 | Male | − | None | −50 | −357 | |
| 7 | 70 | Male | + | 321 | 21 | −401 | |
Mean relative susceptibility value of hemorrhage was higher than lipid rich necrosis in all five cases, and mean relative susceptibility value of calcification was lower than lipid rich necrosis in all six cases. Statistical analysis proved that the mean relative susceptibility values of hemorrhage were significantly higher than the values of lipid rich necrosis (P = 0.0313, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, n = 5), and the values of calcification were statistically significantly lower than the values of lipid rich necrosis (P = 0.0156, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, n = 6).
The CNRs between each component (hemorrhage, lipid rich necrosis and calcification) and sternocleidomastoid muscle on conventional vessel wall imaging
| Contrast–noise ratios | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1WI | T2WI | PDWI | TOF | ||
| Case 1 | Hemorrhage | 115.3 | 8.7 | 18.3 | 38.7 |
| Lipid rich necrosis | −15.2 | 19 | 11.7 | 27.7 | |
| Calcification | 4.7 | 0.7 | −1 | 0.3 | |
| Case 2 | Hemorrhage | 16.3 | 8.8 | −3.1 | 20 |
| Lipid rich necrosis | −17.5 | 24.8 | 4.2 | 9 | |
| Calcification | 2 | 25.8 | 5.4 | 9.5 | |
| Case 3 | Lipid rich necrosis | −2 | 8.5 | 4 | 19.2 |
| Calcification | 20.8 | 16.3 | −10.3 | 1.6 | |
| Case 4 | Hemorrhage | −5.2 | 14.6 | −6.9 | −6.7 |
| Lipid rich necrosis | −16.3 | 28 | 7.6 | 4 | |
| Calcification | −8.7 | 1 | −6.4 | −8 | |
| Case 5 | Hemorrhage | 13.8 | 93.7 | 14.3 | 46.3 |
| Lipid rich necrosis | −28.6 | 66.7 | 14.8 | 17.7 | |
| Case 6 | Lipid rich necrosis | −4.3 | 9 | 9.6 | 37 |
| Calcification | 2 | 7.8 | 1 | 26.7 | |
| Case 7 | Hemorrhage | 14.2 | 16.5 | −3.4 | −2.5 |
| Lipid rich necrosis | −18.6 | 30.5 | −0.6 | 1.5 | |
| Calcification | −9.8 | 3.8 | −4.4 | −20 | |
There were no significant differences between CNRs of hemorrhage and lipid rich necrosis on all conventional vessel wall images (T1WI; P = 0.2188, T2WI; P = 0.3125, PDWI; P = 0.1563, TOF; P = 0.125, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, n = 5). There were significant differences between CNRs of lipid rich necrosis and calcification on T1WI, PDWI, TOF. Although there was no significant difference on T2WI, calcification could be identified on conventional vessel wall images (T1WI; P = 0.0156, T2WI; P = 0.1094, PDWI; P = 0.0313, TOF; P = 0.0313, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, n = 5). CNR, contrast-to-noise ratio; T1WI, T1-weighted image; T2WI, T2-weighted image; PDWI, proton-density weighted images; TOF, time-of-flight.
Fig. 1(a and b) A case example (case 1). (a) Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) image. (b) Focus on left carotid plaque. (A) Hematoxylin–eosin-stained histopathological cross-section (Hemorrhage, lipid rich necrosis, and calcification are surrounded by red, green, and blue dot lines, respectively.). (B) QSM, (C) T1-weighted image (T1WI), (D) T2-weighted image (T2WI), (E) proton-density weighted images (PDWI), (F) time-of-flight (TOF). Hemorrhage (red arrow) and lipid rich necrosis component (surrounded by green dot lines) were clearly differentiated on QSM (B), whereas on black-blood T1WI and TOF (C and F) intraplaque hemorrhage and lipid rich necrosis showed similar signals. On TOF, calcification (blue arrow) showed low signal, but the low signal of calcification is clear on QSM.